↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUN076+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:19:22 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 5.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  29 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  186 (  81 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  201 (  81   ~;  60   |;  60   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  179 (  23 sgn  42   !;  40   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [Y24] :
    ! [X19] :
      ( ( X19 = Y24
        & r1(X19) )
      | ( X19 != Y24
        & ~ r1(X19) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X11] :
    ? [Y21] :
    ! [X12] :
      ( ( X12 = Y21
        & r2(X11,X12) )
      | ( X12 != Y21
        & ~ r2(X11,X12) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X13,X14] :
    ? [Y22] :
    ! [X15] :
      ( ( X15 = Y22
        & r3(X13,X14,X15) )
      | ( X15 != Y22
        & ~ r3(X13,X14,X15) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

fof(axiom_1a,axiom,
    ! [X1,X8] :
    ? [Y4] :
      ( ? [Y7] :
          ( r3(X1,X8,Y7)
          & r2(Y7,Y4) )
      & ? [Y5] :
          ( Y5 = Y4
          & ? [Y15] :
              ( r3(X1,Y15,Y5)
              & r2(X8,Y15) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_1a) ).

fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
    ? [Y9] :
      ( Y9 = X4
      & ? [Y16] :
          ( r3(X4,Y16,Y9)
          & r1(Y16) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_4a) ).

fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
    ! [X5] :
    ? [Y8] :
      ( ? [Y18] :
          ( Y8 = Y18
          & r1(Y18) )
      & ? [Y17] :
          ( r4(X5,Y17,Y8)
          & r1(Y17) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5a) ).

fof(thereexistsanevennumber,conjecture,
    ? [Y1,Y2,Y3] :
      ( ? [Y5] :
          ( Y5 = Y1
          & r3(Y2,Y3,Y5) )
      & ? [Y4] :
          ( ? [Y6] :
              ( ? [Y7] :
                  ( ? [Y8] :
                      ( r2(Y8,Y7)
                      & r1(Y8) )
                  & r2(Y7,Y6) )
              & r4(Y6,Y2,Y4) )
          & Y4 = Y1 ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',thereexistsanevennumber) ).

fof(thereexistsanevennumber_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [Y1,Y2,Y3] :
        ( ? [Y5] :
            ( Y5 = Y1
            & r3(Y2,Y3,Y5) )
        & ? [Y4] :
            ( ? [Y6] :
                ( ? [Y7] :
                    ( ? [Y8] :
                        ( r2(Y8,Y7)
                        & r1(Y8) )
                    & r2(Y7,Y6) )
                & r4(Y6,Y2,Y4) )
            & Y4 = Y1 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thereexistsanevennumber]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ? [Y24] :
    ! [X19] :
      ( ( Y24 = X19
        & r1(X19) )
      | ( Y24 != X19
        & ~ r1(X19) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_1_sk,plain,
    ! [X19] :
      ( ( sK0 = X19
        & r1(X19) )
      | ( sK0 != X19
        & ~ r1(X19) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(Y24,sK0)],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_1,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0] :
        ( r1(VAR_0)
        | sK0 != VAR_0 )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( sK0 = VAR_0
        | ~ r1(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_1_sk]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( sK0 = A
    | ~ r1(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_1]) ).

fof(nnf_8,plain,
    ! [X4] :
    ? [Y9] :
      ( Y9 = X4
      & ? [Y16] :
          ( r3(X4,Y16,Y9)
          & r1(Y16) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_4a,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( sK4(X4) = X4
      & r3(X4,sK1(X4),sK4(X4))
      & r1(sK1(X4)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK4]),skolemize(Y9,sK4(X4)),skolemize(Y16,sK1(X4))],[nnf_8]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    r1(sK1(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4a]) ).

fof(nnf_9,plain,
    ! [X5] :
    ? [Y8] :
      ( ? [Y18] :
          ( Y18 = Y8
          & r1(Y18) )
      & ? [Y17] :
          ( r4(X5,Y17,Y8)
          & r1(Y17) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_5a,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( sK3(X5) = sK8(X5)
      & r1(sK3(X5))
      & r4(X5,sK2(X5),sK8(X5))
      & r1(sK2(X5)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK8,sK3]),skolemize(Y8,sK8(X5)),skolemize(Y17,sK2(X5)),skolemize(Y18,sK3(X5))],[nnf_9]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    r1(sK2(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5a]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    r1(sK3(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5a]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( A != V7
    | ~ r3(D,V6,V7)
    | ~ r2(F,E)
    | ~ r1(F)
    | ~ r2(E,C)
    | ~ r4(C,D,B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[thereexistsanevennumber_neg]) ).

cnf(c_22,plain,
    r3(A,sK1(A),sK4(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4a]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( A != V7
    | ~ r3(D,V6,V7)
    | ~ r2(sK3(F),E)
    | ~ r2(E,C)
    | ~ r4(C,D,B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_17]) ).

fof(nnf_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X8] :
    ? [Y4] :
      ( ? [Y7] :
          ( r3(X1,X8,Y7)
          & r2(Y7,Y4) )
      & ? [Y5] :
          ( Y4 = Y5
          & ? [Y15] :
              ( r3(X1,Y15,Y5)
              & r2(X8,Y15) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_1a,plain,
    ! [X1,X8] :
      ( r3(X1,X8,sK5(X1,X8))
      & r2(sK5(X1,X8),sK11(X1,X8))
      & sK11(X1,X8) = sK10(X1,X8)
      & r3(X1,sK9(X1,X8),sK10(X1,X8))
      & r2(X8,sK9(X1,X8)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK9,sK10,sK11,sK5]),skolemize(Y4,sK11(X1,X8)),skolemize(Y5,sK10(X1,X8)),skolemize(Y15,sK9(X1,X8)),skolemize(Y7,sK5(X1,X8))],[nnf_5]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    r3(A,B,sK5(A,B)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_1a]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ! [X13,X14] :
    ? [Y22] :
    ! [X15] :
      ( ( Y22 = X15
        & r3(X13,X14,X15) )
      | ( Y22 != X15
        & ~ r3(X13,X14,X15) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_3_sk,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ( sK6(X13,X14) = X15
        & r3(X13,X14,X15) )
      | ( sK6(X13,X14) != X15
        & ~ r3(X13,X14,X15) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(Y22,sK6(X13,X14))],[nnf_3]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_3,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( r3(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2)
        | sK6(VAR_0,VAR_1) != VAR_2 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK6(VAR_0,VAR_1) = VAR_2
        | ~ r3(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_3_sk]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    ( r3(A,B,C)
    | sK6(A,B) != C ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_3]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( sK6(A,B) = C
    | ~ r3(A,B,C) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_3]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    sK6(A,sK1(A)) = sK4(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_22]) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    sK4(A) = sK6(A,sK1(A)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_34]) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    sK6(A,B) = sK5(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_30]) ).

cnf(c_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( D != C
    | ~ r2(sK3(V7),V6)
    | ~ r2(V6,F)
    | ~ r4(F,A,E)
    | D != E
    | sK6(A,B) != C ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_25]) ).

cnf(c_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( D != C
    | ~ r2(sK3(V7),V6)
    | ~ r2(V6,F)
    | ~ r4(F,A,E)
    | D != E
    | sK5(A,B) != C ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_47]) ).

fof(nnf_2,plain,
    ! [X11] :
    ? [Y21] :
    ! [X12] :
      ( ( Y21 = X12
        & r2(X11,X12) )
      | ( Y21 != X12
        & ~ r2(X11,X12) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2_sk,plain,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( ( sK7(X11) = X12
        & r2(X11,X12) )
      | ( sK7(X11) != X12
        & ~ r2(X11,X12) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7]),skolemize(Y21,sK7(X11))],[nnf_2]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( r2(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | sK7(VAR_0) != VAR_1 )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( sK7(VAR_0) = VAR_1
        | ~ r2(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( r2(A,B)
    | sK7(A) != B ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2]) ).

cnf(c_104,plain,
    sK4(A) = A,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4a]) ).

cnf(c_263,plain,
    sK6(A,sK1(A)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_35,c_104]) ).

cnf(c_105,plain,
    sK5(A,sK1(A)) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_263]) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    r4(A,sK2(A),sK8(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5a]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    sK3(A) = sK8(A),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5a]) ).

cnf(c_112,plain,
    sK0 = sK1(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_113,plain,
    sK1(A) = sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    sK0 = sK2(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    sK2(A) = sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_114]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    sK0 = sK3(A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_264,plain,
    sK0 = sK8(A),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_116]) ).

cnf(c_117,plain,
    sK8(A) = sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_264]) ).

cnf(c_265,plain,
    sK4(A) = sK6(A,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    sK4(A) = sK5(A,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_265]) ).

cnf(c_266,negated_conjecture,
    ( D != C
    | ~ r2(sK8(V7),V6)
    | ~ r2(V6,F)
    | ~ r4(F,A,E)
    | D != E
    | sK5(A,B) != C ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_48]) ).

cnf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
    ( D != C
    | ~ r2(sK0,V6)
    | ~ r2(V6,F)
    | ~ r4(F,A,E)
    | D != E
    | sK5(A,B) != C ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_266]) ).

cnf(c_160,plain,
    sK5(A,sK0) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_105]) ).

cnf(c_267,plain,
    r4(A,sK0,sK8(A)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_106]) ).

cnf(c_161,plain,
    r4(A,sK0,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_267]) ).

cnf(c_170,plain,
    sK4(A) = A,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_160,c_132]) ).

cnf(c_171,plain,
    r2(A,sK7(A)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_268,negated_conjecture,
    ( A != D
    | ~ r2(sK0,E)
    | ~ r2(E,C)
    | ~ r4(C,D,B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_159,c_160]) ).

cnf(c_269,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK4(C) != B
    | ~ r2(sK0,D)
    | ~ r2(D,A)
    | ~ r4(A,B,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_268,c_170]) ).

cnf(c_270,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK4(sK0) != sK0
    | ~ r2(sK0,A)
    | ~ r2(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_161]) ).

cnf(c_271,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK4(sK0) != sK0
    | ~ r2(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_270,c_171]) ).

cnf(c_272,negated_conjecture,
    sK4(sK0) != sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_271,c_171]) ).

cnf(c_262,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_272,c_170]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUN076+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/5.58  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.58  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.58  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.58  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.58  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.58  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.58  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.58  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:30:59 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.58  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.59  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/5.59  % Process 2487388 was started by sandbox on n010,
% 0.09/5.59  % Sat Sep 26 04:30:59 2026
% 0.09/5.59  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/5.59  
% 0.09/5.59  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/5.68  
% 0.14/5.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/5.68  
% 0.14/5.68  % Proof 1 at 0.07 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/5.68  % Length of proof is 40.
% 0.14/5.68  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.14/5.68  % Maximum clause weight is 32.000.
% 0.14/5.68  % Given clauses 56.
% 0.14/5.68  
% 0.14/5.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------