↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUN076+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:29:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.94s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  23 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  119 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  131 (  58   ~;  43   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  108 (   0 sgn  85   !;  23   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( X1 = X0
        & r1(X1) )
      | ( X1 != X0
        & ~ r1(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( X2 = X1
        & r2(X0,X2) )
      | ( X2 != X1
        & ~ r2(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( X1 = X0
      & ? [X2] :
          ( r3(X0,X2,X1)
          & r1(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( X1 = X3
          & r1(X3) )
      & ? [X2] :
          ( r4(X0,X2,X1)
          & r1(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_5a) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X7] :
          ( X7 = X0
          & r3(X1,X2,X7) )
      & ? [X3] :
          ( ? [X4] :
              ( ? [X5] :
                  ( ? [X6] :
                      ( r2(X6,X5)
                      & r1(X6) )
                  & r2(X5,X4) )
              & r4(X4,X1,X3) )
          & X3 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thereexistsanevennumber) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ? [X7] :
            ( X7 = X0
            & r3(X1,X2,X7) )
        & ? [X3] :
            ( ? [X4] :
                ( ? [X5] :
                    ( ? [X6] :
                        ( r2(X6,X5)
                        & r1(X6) )
                    & r2(X5,X4) )
                & r4(X4,X1,X3) )
            & X3 = X0 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X7] :
          ( X0 != X7
          | ~ r3(X1,X2,X7) )
      | ! [X3] :
          ( ! [X4] :
              ( ! [X5] :
                  ( ! [X6] :
                      ( ~ r2(X6,X5)
                      | ~ r1(X6) )
                  | ~ r2(X5,X4) )
              | ~ r4(X4,X1,X3) )
          | X0 != X3 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( sK0 = X1
        & r1(X1) )
      | ( sK0 != X1
        & ~ r1(X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f1]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X2] :
      ( ( sK1(X0) = X2
        & r2(X0,X2) )
      | ( sK1(X0) != X2
        & ~ r2(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X1,sK1(X0))],[f2]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK12(X0) = X0
      & r3(X0,sK13(X0),sK12(X0))
      & r1(sK13(X0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK12,sK13]),skolemize(X1,sK12(X0)),skolemize(X2,sK13(X0))],[f8]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sK14(X0) = sK16(X0)
      & r1(sK16(X0))
      & r4(X0,sK15(X0),sK14(X0))
      & r1(sK15(X0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK14,sK15,sK16]),skolemize(X1,sK14(X0)),skolemize(X2,sK15(X0)),skolemize(X3,sK16(X0))],[f9]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( r1(X1)
      | sK0 != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( sK0 = X1
      | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( r2(X0,X2)
      | sK1(X0) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0] : sK12(X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0] : r3(X0,sK13(X0),sK12(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0] : sK14(X0) = sK16(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0] : r1(sK16(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0] : r4(X0,sK15(X0),sK14(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0] : r1(sK15(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( X0 != X7
      | ~ r3(X1,X2,X7)
      | ~ r2(X6,X5)
      | ~ r1(X6)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4)
      | ~ r4(X4,X1,X3)
      | X0 != X3 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X0] : r4(X0,sK15(X0),sK16(X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f56,f54]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    r1(sK0),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0] : r2(X0,sK1(X0)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( X3 != X7
      | ~ r3(X1,X2,X7)
      | ~ r2(X6,X5)
      | ~ r1(X6)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4)
      | ~ r4(X4,X1,X3) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X2,X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ r3(X1,X2,X7)
      | ~ r2(X6,X5)
      | ~ r1(X6)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4)
      | ~ r4(X4,X1,X7) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f77]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sK0 )
      | ~ r1(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    r1(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r2(X0,sK1(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

tcf(c_67,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r3(X0,sK13(X0),sK12(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : sK12(X0) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r1(sK15(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r4(X0,sK15(X0),sK16(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r1(sK16(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

tcf(c_77,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ~ r1(X5)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4)
      | ~ r2(X4,X3)
      | ~ r4(X3,X0,X2)
      | ~ r3(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

tcf(c_193,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r3(X0,sK13(X0),X0),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_676,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( ~ r1(X5)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4)
      | ~ r2(X4,X3)
      | ~ r4(X3,X0,X2)
      | ~ r3(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_77]) ).

tcf(c_949,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ r1(X3)
      | ~ r2(X3,X2)
      | ~ r2(X2,X0)
      | ~ r4(X0,X1,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_676]) ).

tcf(c_970,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : sK15(X0) = sK0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_971,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : sK16(X0) = sK0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_974,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r4(X0,sK0,sK16(X0)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_970]) ).

tcf(c_1004,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : r4(X0,sK0,sK0),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_974,c_971]) ).

tcf(c_1005,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ r1(X2)
      | ~ r2(X2,X0)
      | ~ r2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1004,c_949]) ).

tcf(c_1015,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ r1(X0)
      | ~ r2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_1005]) ).

tcf(c_1026,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ r1(X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_1015]) ).

tcf(c_1029,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_1026]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUN076+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 05:59:18 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.44  % Proving...
% 0.94/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.94/1.19  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.94/1.19  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % 
% 0.94/1.19  % clauses                               29
% 0.94/1.19  % conjectures                           1
% 0.94/1.19  % EPR                                   5
% 0.94/1.19  % Horn                                  25
% 0.94/1.19  % unary                                 18
% 0.94/1.19  % binary                                9
% 0.94/1.19  % lits                                  44
% 0.94/1.19  % lits eq                               10
% 0.94/1.19  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.94/1.19  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.94/1.19  % fd_cond                               1
% 0.94/1.19  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 0.94/1.19  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ 
% 0.94/1.19  % Current options:
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 0.94/1.19  % 
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.19  
% 0.94/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------