↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : NUN080+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:29:41 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.60s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.60s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : NUN080+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 20:35:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.38  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.60/0.64  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.68  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.60/0.68  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.68  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.60/0.68  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.60/0.68  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.60/0.68  
% 0.60/0.68  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.68  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.60/0.68  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  % File     : NUN080+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.60/0.68  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.60/0.68  % Problem  : Robinson arithmetic: There exists X + 2 = Y
% 0.60/0.68  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.60/0.68  % English  :
% 0.60/0.68  
% 0.60/0.68  % Refs     : [BBJ03] Boolos et al. (2003), Computability and Logic
% 0.60/0.68  %          : [Smi07] Smith (2007), An Introduction to Goedel's Theorems
% 0.60/0.68  %          : [Lam18] Lampert (2018), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.60/0.68  % Source   : [Lam18]
% 0.60/0.68  % Names    : xplustwoeqy [Lam18]
% 0.60/0.68  
% 0.60/0.68  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.60/0.68  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.2.0, 0.11 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.10 v7.3.0
% 0.60/0.68  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Number of atoms       :   49 (  18 equ)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   4 avg)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Number of connectives :   51 (  14   ~;  10   |;  27   &)
% 0.60/0.68  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   8 avg)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.60/0.68  %            Number of variables   :   49 (  23   !;  26   ?)
% 0.60/0.68  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.60/0.68  
% 0.60/0.68  % Comments : Translated to FOL with equality.
% 0.60/0.68  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  include('Axioms/NUM008+0.ax').
% 0.60/0.68  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  fof(xplustwoeqy,conjecture,
% 0.60/0.68      ? [Y1,Y2,Y3] :
% 0.60/0.68        ( Y3 = Y2
% 0.60/0.68        & ? [Y4] :
% 0.60/0.68            ( r3(Y1,Y4,Y3)
% 0.60/0.68            & ? [Y5] :
% 0.60/0.68                ( r2(Y5,Y4)
% 0.60/0.68                & ? [Y6] :
% 0.60/0.68                    ( r1(Y6)
% 0.60/0.68                    & r2(Y6,Y5) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.60/0.68  
% 0.60/0.68  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.68  % Proof found
% 0.60/0.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.68  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.60/0.68  %ClaNum:63(EqnAxiom:35)
% 0.60/0.68  %VarNum:115(SingletonVarNum:56)
% 0.60/0.68  %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.60/0.68  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.60/0.68  %SharedTerms:1
% 0.60/0.68  %goalClause: 63
% 0.60/0.68  [36]P1(f1(x361))
% 0.60/0.68  [37]P1(f4(x371))
% 0.60/0.68  [38]P1(f5(x381))
% 0.60/0.68  [41]P3(x411,f1(x411),x411)
% 0.60/0.68  [43]P4(x431,f5(x431),f4(x431))
% 0.60/0.68  [39]P2(x391,f6(x392,x391))
% 0.60/0.68  [40]P2(x401,f2(x402,x401))
% 0.60/0.68  [42]P2(f15(x421,x422),f7(x421,x422))
% 0.60/0.68  [44]P3(x441,x442,f15(x441,x442))
% 0.60/0.68  [45]P4(x451,x452,f3(x451,x452))
% 0.60/0.68  [46]P3(x461,f6(x461,x462),f7(x461,x462))
% 0.60/0.68  [47]P4(x471,f2(x471,x472),f16(x471,x472))
% 0.60/0.68  [48]P3(f3(x481,x482),x481,f16(x481,x482))
% 0.60/0.68  [49]P1(x491)+~E(x491,a8)
% 0.60/0.69  [50]~P1(x501)+E(x501,a8)
% 0.60/0.69  [51]E(f11(x511),x511)+E(f9(x511),x511)
% 0.60/0.69  [52]E(f11(x521),x521)+P1(f9(x521))
% 0.60/0.69  [55]P2(f10(x551),f11(x551))+E(f9(x551),x551)
% 0.60/0.69  [57]P2(f10(x571),f11(x571))+P1(f9(x571))
% 0.60/0.69  [53]P2(x531,x532)+~E(x532,f12(x531))
% 0.60/0.69  [54]~P2(x542,x541)+E(x541,f12(x542))
% 0.60/0.69  [59]P3(x591,x592,x593)+~E(x593,f13(x591,x592))
% 0.60/0.69  [60]P4(x601,x602,x603)+~E(x603,f14(x601,x602))
% 0.60/0.69  [61]~P3(x612,x613,x611)+E(x611,f13(x612,x613))
% 0.60/0.69  [62]~P4(x622,x623,x621)+E(x621,f14(x622,x623))
% 0.60/0.69  [56]~P1(x561)+~E(x561,x562)+~P2(x563,x562)
% 0.60/0.69  [58]~P2(x582,x584)+~P2(x581,x583)+E(x581,x582)+~E(x583,x584)
% 0.60/0.69  [63]~E(x631,x632)+~P2(x633,x634)+~P3(x636,x635,x631)+~P2(x634,x635)+~P1(x633)
% 0.60/0.69  %EqnAxiom
% 0.60/0.69  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.60/0.69  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.60/0.69  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.60/0.69  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f1(x41),f1(x42))
% 0.60/0.69  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x51),f4(x52))
% 0.60/0.69  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61),f5(x62))
% 0.60/0.69  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f6(x71,x73),f6(x72,x73))
% 0.60/0.69  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f6(x83,x81),f6(x83,x82))
% 0.60/0.69  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f2(x91,x93),f2(x92,x93))
% 0.60/0.69  [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f2(x103,x101),f2(x103,x102))
% 0.60/0.69  [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f14(x111,x113),f14(x112,x113))
% 0.60/0.69  [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f14(x123,x121),f14(x123,x122))
% 0.60/0.69  [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f15(x131,x133),f15(x132,x133))
% 0.60/0.69  [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f15(x143,x141),f15(x143,x142))
% 0.60/0.69  [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f7(x151,x153),f7(x152,x153))
% 0.60/0.69  [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f7(x163,x161),f7(x163,x162))
% 0.60/0.69  [17]~E(x171,x172)+E(f10(x171),f10(x172))
% 0.60/0.69  [18]~E(x181,x182)+E(f13(x181,x183),f13(x182,x183))
% 0.60/0.69  [19]~E(x191,x192)+E(f13(x193,x191),f13(x193,x192))
% 0.60/0.69  [20]~E(x201,x202)+E(f9(x201),f9(x202))
% 0.60/0.69  [21]~E(x211,x212)+E(f3(x211,x213),f3(x212,x213))
% 0.60/0.69  [22]~E(x221,x222)+E(f3(x223,x221),f3(x223,x222))
% 0.60/0.69  [23]~E(x231,x232)+E(f12(x231),f12(x232))
% 0.60/0.69  [24]~E(x241,x242)+E(f11(x241),f11(x242))
% 0.60/0.69  [25]~E(x251,x252)+E(f16(x251,x253),f16(x252,x253))
% 0.60/0.69  [26]~E(x261,x262)+E(f16(x263,x261),f16(x263,x262))
% 0.60/0.69  [27]~P1(x271)+P1(x272)+~E(x271,x272)
% 0.60/0.69  [28]P3(x282,x283,x284)+~E(x281,x282)+~P3(x281,x283,x284)
% 0.60/0.69  [29]P3(x293,x292,x294)+~E(x291,x292)+~P3(x293,x291,x294)
% 0.60/0.69  [30]P3(x303,x304,x302)+~E(x301,x302)+~P3(x303,x304,x301)
% 0.60/0.69  [31]P2(x312,x313)+~E(x311,x312)+~P2(x311,x313)
% 0.60/0.69  [32]P2(x323,x322)+~E(x321,x322)+~P2(x323,x321)
% 0.60/0.69  [33]P4(x332,x333,x334)+~E(x331,x332)+~P4(x331,x333,x334)
% 0.60/0.69  [34]P4(x343,x342,x344)+~E(x341,x342)+~P4(x343,x341,x344)
% 0.60/0.69  [35]P4(x353,x354,x352)+~E(x351,x352)+~P4(x353,x354,x351)
% 0.60/0.69  
% 0.60/0.69  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.60/0.69  cnf(65,plain,
% 0.60/0.69     (P2(x651,f12(x651))),
% 0.60/0.69     inference(equality_inference,[],[53])).
% 0.60/0.69  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.60/0.69     (P3(x681,x682,f13(x681,x682))),
% 0.60/0.69     inference(equality_inference,[],[59])).
% 0.60/0.69  cnf(70,plain,
% 0.60/0.69     (~P2(x701,x702)+~P1(x703)+~P2(x703,x701)+~P3(x705,x702,x704)),
% 0.60/0.69     inference(equality_inference,[],[63])).
% 0.60/0.69  cnf(71,plain,
% 0.60/0.69     ($false),
% 0.60/0.69     inference(scs_inference,[],[65,36,39,68,70]),
% 0.60/0.69     ['proof']).
% 0.60/0.69  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.60/0.69  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------