↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUN080+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:27:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  10 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  37   ~;  22   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   0 sgn  41   !;  18   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X1)
        & X1 != X0 )
      | ( r1(X1)
        & X1 = X0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X0,X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r2(X0,X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
    ? [X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ? [X4] :
              ( r2(X1,X4)
              & r3(X0,X4,X3) )
          & X3 = X2 )
      & ? [X5] :
          ( r2(X5,X2)
          & r3(X0,X1,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = X1
      & ? [X3] :
          ( r3(X0,X3,X2)
          & ? [X4] :
              ( r2(X4,X3)
              & ? [X5] :
                  ( r1(X5)
                  & r2(X5,X4) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xplustwoeqy) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( X2 = X1
        & ? [X3] :
            ( r3(X0,X3,X2)
            & ? [X4] :
                ( r2(X4,X3)
                & ? [X5] :
                    ( r1(X5)
                    & r2(X5,X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( X1 != X2
      | ! [X3] :
          ( ~ r3(X0,X3,X2)
          | ! [X4] :
              ( ~ r2(X4,X3)
              | ! [X5] :
                  ( ~ r1(X5)
                  | ~ r2(X5,X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X1)
        & sK0 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X1)
        & sK0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X0,sK0)],[f1]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X2] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X0,X2)
        & sK1(X0) != X2 )
      | ( r2(X0,X2)
        & sK1(X0) = X2 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X1,sK1(X0))],[f2]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( r2(X1,sK6(X0,X1))
      & r3(X0,sK6(X0,X1),sK5(X0,X1))
      & sK4(X0,X1) = sK5(X0,X1)
      & r2(sK7(X0,X1),sK4(X0,X1))
      & r3(X0,X1,sK7(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X2,sK4(X0,X1)),skolemize(X3,sK5(X0,X1)),skolemize(X4,sK6(X0,X1)),skolemize(X5,sK7(X0,X1))],[f5]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( sK0 != X1
      | r1(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( sK1(X0) != X2
      | r2(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : r3(X0,X1,sK7(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( X1 != X2
      | ~ r3(X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ r2(X4,X3)
      | ~ r1(X5)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    r1(sK0),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0] : r2(X0,sK1(X0)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ r3(X0,X3,X2)
      | ~ r2(X4,X3)
      | ~ r1(X5)
      | ~ r2(X5,X4) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f85,definition,
    ( spl20_3
  <=> ! [X5] : ~ r1(X5) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl20_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ( ! [X5] : ~ r1(X5)
    | ~ spl20_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl20_3 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f67,f86]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ~ spl20_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ r2(X2,X0)
      | ~ r1(X2)
      | ~ r2(X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f40,f77]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ r2(sK1(X0),X1)
      | ~ r1(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f116,f69]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ r1(X0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f117,f69]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    spl20_3,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f123,f85]) ).

cnf(s37,plain,
    ~ spl20_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f88]) ).

cnf(s84,plain,
    spl20_3,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f126]) ).

cnf(s85,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s37,s84]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s85]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUN080+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.12/0.40  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.40  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 22:01:22 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.40  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.17/0.45  Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929109)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=2351460121:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3929109-3929116"...
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)...printing done.
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)------------------------------
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929116)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.17/0.48  % (3929109)Success in time 0.026 s
% 0.17/0.48  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------