%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : ePrincess---1.0 % Problem : NUN080+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:25:10 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 33.44s 10.52s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : NUN080+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0. % 0.12/0.13 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 02:54:36 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.57/0.61 ____ _ % 0.57/0.61 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________ % 0.57/0.61 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/ % 0.57/0.61 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ ) % 0.57/0.61 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/ % 0.57/0.61 % 0.57/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic % 0.57/0.61 (ePrincess v.1.0) % 0.57/0.61 % 0.57/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015 % 0.57/0.61 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015 % 0.57/0.61 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner) % 0.57/0.61 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). % 0.57/0.61 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se % 0.57/0.61 % 0.57/0.61 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/ % 0.57/0.61 % 0.57/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.77/0.66 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 1.74/0.97 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.01/1.14 Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 2.22/1.16 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.66/1.55 Prover 0: gave up % 3.66/1.56 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 3.66/1.58 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.94/1.65 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 3.94/1.66 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.74/1.81 Prover 1: gave up % 4.74/1.81 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 4.88/1.83 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 4.88/1.88 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.88/1.88 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.68/2.04 Prover 2: gave up % 5.68/2.04 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 5.68/2.06 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 5.98/2.08 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.98/2.08 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.45/2.17 Prover 3: gave up % 6.45/2.17 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete % 6.45/2.19 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 6.75/2.23 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.75/2.24 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.47/2.66 Prover 4: gave up % 8.47/2.66 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 8.47/2.67 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 8.47/2.70 Prover 5: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.47/2.70 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.18/2.80 Prover 5: gave up % 9.18/2.80 Prover 6: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 9.18/2.82 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 9.18/2.84 Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 9.18/2.84 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.89/2.95 Prover 6: gave up % 9.89/2.95 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 9.89/2.97 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 9.89/2.98 Prover 7: Proving ... % 33.44/10.52 Prover 7: proved (7565ms) % 33.44/10.52 % 33.44/10.52 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 33.44/10.52 % 33.44/10.52 Generating proof ... %------------------------------------------------------------------------------