↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUN081+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:19:23 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   74 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  22   ~;  15   |;  37   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (  24 sgn  12   !;  32   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_2a,axiom,
    ! [X2,X9] :
    ? [Y2] :
      ( ? [Y6] :
          ( r4(X2,X9,Y6)
          & r3(Y6,X2,Y2) )
      & ? [Y3] :
          ( ? [Y14] :
              ( r4(X2,Y14,Y3)
              & r2(X9,Y14) )
          & id(Y3,Y2) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_2a) ).

fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
    ! [X4] :
    ? [Y9] :
      ( ? [Y16] :
          ( r3(X4,Y16,Y9)
          & r1(Y16) )
      & id(Y9,X4) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_4a) ).

fof(axiom_5a,axiom,
    ! [X5] :
    ? [Y8] :
      ( ? [Y18] :
          ( r1(Y18)
          & id(Y8,Y18) )
      & ? [Y17] :
          ( r4(X5,Y17,Y8)
          & r1(Y17) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5a) ).

fof(xplusyidthree,conjecture,
    ? [Y1,Y2,Y3] :
      ( ? [Y4] :
          ( ? [Y5] :
              ( ? [Y6] :
                  ( ? [Y7] :
                      ( r2(Y7,Y6)
                      & r1(Y7) )
                  & r2(Y6,Y5) )
              & r2(Y5,Y4) )
          & id(Y3,Y4) )
      & r3(Y1,Y2,Y3) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',xplusyidthree) ).

fof(xplusyidthree_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [Y1,Y2,Y3] :
        ( ? [Y4] :
            ( ? [Y5] :
                ( ? [Y6] :
                    ( ? [Y7] :
                        ( r2(Y7,Y6)
                        & r1(Y7) )
                    & r2(Y6,Y5) )
                & r2(Y5,Y4) )
            & id(Y3,Y4) )
        & r3(Y1,Y2,Y3) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[xplusyidthree]) ).

fof(nnf_13,plain,
    ! [X2,X9] :
    ? [Y2] :
      ( ? [Y6] :
          ( r4(X2,X9,Y6)
          & r3(Y6,X2,Y2) )
      & ? [Y3] :
          ( ? [Y14] :
              ( r4(X2,Y14,Y3)
              & r2(X9,Y14) )
          & id(Y3,Y2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_2a,plain,
    ! [X2,X9] :
      ( r4(X2,X9,sK6(X2,X9))
      & r3(sK6(X2,X9),X2,sK5(X2,X9))
      & r4(X2,sK0(X2,X9),sK4(X2,X9))
      & r2(X9,sK0(X2,X9))
      & id(sK4(X2,X9),sK5(X2,X9)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK0,sK6]),skolemize(Y2,sK5(X2,X9)),skolemize(Y3,sK4(X2,X9)),skolemize(Y14,sK0(X2,X9)),skolemize(Y6,sK6(X2,X9))],[nnf_13]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    r2(A,sK0(B,A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_2a]) ).

fof(nnf_15,plain,
    ! [X4] :
    ? [Y9] :
      ( ? [Y16] :
          ( r3(X4,Y16,Y9)
          & r1(Y16) )
      & id(Y9,X4) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_4a,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( r3(X4,sK2(X4),sK1(X4))
      & r1(sK2(X4))
      & id(sK1(X4),X4) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2]),skolemize(Y9,sK1(X4)),skolemize(Y16,sK2(X4))],[nnf_15]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    id(sK1(A),A),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4a]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    r3(A,sK2(A),sK1(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_4a]) ).

fof(nnf_16,plain,
    ! [X5] :
    ? [Y8] :
      ( ? [Y18] :
          ( r1(Y18)
          & id(Y8,Y18) )
      & ? [Y17] :
          ( r4(X5,Y17,Y8)
          & r1(Y17) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5a]) ).

fof(sk_axiom_5a,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( r1(sK3(X5))
      & id(sK8(X5),sK3(X5))
      & r4(X5,sK7(X5),sK8(X5))
      & r1(sK7(X5)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7,sK8,sK3]),skolemize(Y8,sK8(X5)),skolemize(Y17,sK7(X5)),skolemize(Y18,sK3(X5))],[nnf_16]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    r1(sK3(A)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_axiom_5a]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(V6,F)
    | ~ r1(V6)
    | ~ r2(F,E)
    | ~ r2(E,D)
    | ~ id(C,D)
    | ~ r3(A,B,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[xplusyidthree_neg]) ).

cnf(c_206,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(F,E)
    | ~ r1(F)
    | ~ r2(E,D)
    | ~ r2(D,C)
    | ~ r3(A,B,sK1(C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_207,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(F,E)
    | ~ r1(F)
    | ~ r2(E,D)
    | ~ r3(A,B,sK1(sK0(C,D))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_206,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_208,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(F,E)
    | ~ r1(F)
    | ~ r3(A,B,sK1(sK0(C,sK0(D,E)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_207,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_209,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r2(sK3(F),E)
    | ~ r3(A,B,sK1(sK0(C,sK0(D,E)))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_208,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_204,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r3(A,B,sK1(sK0(C,sK0(D,sK0(E,sK3(F)))))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_205,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_52]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUN081+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:32:49 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.44  % Process 619052 was started by sandbox2 on n020,
% 0.18/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 04:32:49 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.18/0.48  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.18/0.48  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.18/0.48  % Maximum clause weight is 46.000.
% 0.18/0.48  % Given clauses 43.
% 0.18/0.48  
% 0.18/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------