↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUN085+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:00:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  40 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  146 (  57 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  137 (  57   ~;  42   |;  38   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  100 (   6 sgn  43   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1) ).

fof(axiom_4a,axiom,
    ! [X30] :
    ? [X31] :
      ( ? [X32] :
          ( r1(X32)
          & r3(X30,X32,X31) )
      & X31 = X30 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_4a) ).

fof(axiom_3,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
    ? [X8] :
    ! [X9] :
      ( ( ~ r3(X6,X7,X9)
        & X9 != X8 )
      | ( r3(X6,X7,X9)
        & X9 = X8 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_3) ).

fof(zeroplusoneidzero,conjecture,
    ! [X39] :
      ( ! [X22] :
          ( ! [X23] :
              ( ~ r1(X23)
              | ~ r3(X23,X22,X39) )
          | ! [X16] :
              ( ~ r1(X16)
              | ~ r2(X16,X22) ) )
      | ! [X17] :
          ( X39 != X17
          | ~ r1(X17) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zeroplusoneidzero) ).

fof(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_2) ).

fof(axiom_1a,axiom,
    ! [X14,X15] :
    ? [X16] :
      ( ? [X17] :
          ( ? [X18] :
              ( r2(X15,X18)
              & r3(X14,X18,X17) )
          & X17 = X16 )
      & ? [X19] :
          ( r2(X19,X16)
          & r3(X14,X15,X19) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_1a) ).

fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax',axiom_7a) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ? [X1] :
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ r1(X2)
        & X2 != X1 )
      | ( r1(X2)
        & X2 = X1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X121] :
      ( r1(esk14_1(X121))
      & r3(X121,esk14_1(X121),esk13_1(X121))
      & esk13_1(X121) = X121 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_4a])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X93] :
      ( ( r1(X93)
        | ~ r1(X93) )
      & ( X93 = esk1_0
        | ~ r1(X93) )
      & ( r1(X93)
        | X93 != esk1_0 )
      & ( X93 = esk1_0
        | X93 != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
    ? [X8] :
    ! [X9] :
      ( ( ~ r3(X6,X7,X9)
        & X9 != X8 )
      | ( r3(X6,X7,X9)
        & X9 = X8 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),esk13_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    esk13_1(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 = esk1_0
    | ~ r1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    r1(esk14_1(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X39] :
        ( ! [X22] :
            ( ! [X23] :
                ( ~ r1(X23)
                | ~ r3(X23,X22,X39) )
            | ! [X16] :
                ( ~ r1(X16)
                | ~ r2(X16,X22) ) )
        | ! [X17] :
            ( X39 != X17
            | ~ r1(X17) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zeroplusoneidzero])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3] :
    ? [X4] :
    ! [X5] :
      ( ( ~ r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 != X4 )
      | ( r2(X3,X5)
        & X5 = X4 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_2]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X97,X98,X100] :
      ( ( r3(X97,X98,X100)
        | ~ r3(X97,X98,X100) )
      & ( X100 = esk3_2(X97,X98)
        | ~ r3(X97,X98,X100) )
      & ( r3(X97,X98,X100)
        | X100 != esk3_2(X97,X98) )
      & ( X100 = esk3_2(X97,X98)
        | X100 != esk3_2(X97,X98) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    esk14_1(X1) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X105,X106] :
      ( r2(X106,esk7_2(X105,X106))
      & r3(X105,esk7_2(X105,X106),esk6_2(X105,X106))
      & esk6_2(X105,X106) = esk5_2(X105,X106)
      & r2(esk8_2(X105,X106),esk5_2(X105,X106))
      & r3(X105,X106,esk8_2(X105,X106)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[axiom_1a])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(esk23_0)
    & r3(esk23_0,esk22_0,esk21_0)
    & r1(esk24_0)
    & r2(esk24_0,esk22_0)
    & esk21_0 = esk25_0
    & r1(esk25_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X94,X96] :
      ( ( r2(X94,X96)
        | ~ r2(X94,X96) )
      & ( X96 = esk2_1(X94)
        | ~ r2(X94,X96) )
      & ( r2(X94,X96)
        | X96 != esk2_1(X94) )
      & ( X96 = esk2_1(X94)
        | X96 != esk2_1(X94) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = esk3_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r3(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    r3(X1,esk1_0,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    r3(X1,X2,esk8_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk24_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk25_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    esk21_0 = esk25_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    r3(X1,esk7_2(X1,X2),esk6_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    esk6_2(X1,X2) = esk5_2(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( X1 = esk2_1(X2)
    | ~ r2(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    r2(X1,esk7_2(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    r2(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    esk3_2(X1,esk1_0) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    esk3_2(X1,X2) = esk8_2(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk24_0,esk22_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    esk24_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk23_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    r1(esk21_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_40,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ! [X43] :
          ( ~ r1(X43)
          | X43 != X42 )
      | ~ r2(X41,X42) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    r3(X1,esk7_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    esk7_2(X1,X2) = esk2_1(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    esk2_1(esk8_2(X1,X2)) = esk5_2(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    esk8_2(X1,esk1_0) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    r2(esk1_0,esk22_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    r3(esk23_0,esk22_0,esk21_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    esk23_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    esk21_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_39]) ).

fof(c_0_49,plain,
    ! [X132,X133,X134] :
      ( ~ r1(X134)
      | X134 != X133
      | ~ r2(X132,X133) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    r3(X1,esk2_1(X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    esk5_2(X1,esk1_0) = esk2_1(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_1(esk1_0) = esk22_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    r3(esk1_0,esk22_0,esk1_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ r1(X1)
    | X1 != X2
    | ~ r2(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    r3(X1,esk22_0,esk2_1(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_2(esk1_0,esk22_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ r2(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1(X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( X1 = esk8_2(X2,X3)
    | ~ r3(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    r3(esk1_0,esk22_0,esk22_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    esk8_2(esk1_0,esk22_0) = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( r1(X1)
    | X1 != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(esk22_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    esk22_0 = esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    r1(esk1_0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),c_0_64])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : NUN085+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:24:07 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------