%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:26:22 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.16s 0.35s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.09 % Problem : NUN087+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0. % 0.00/0.10 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.09/0.31 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu % 0.09/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.09/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.09/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.09/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.09/0.31 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.09/0.31 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.09/0.31 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 06:27:44 EDT 2022 % 0.09/0.31 % CPUTime : % 0.16/0.34 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.16/0.34 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4b % 0.16/0.34 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecW. % 0.16/0.34 # % 0.16/0.34 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.16/0.34 # Number of axioms: 28 Number of unprocessed: 28 % 0.16/0.34 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.16/0.34 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.16/0.34 # Hello from C++ % 0.16/0.34 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.16/0.34 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.16/0.34 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.16/0.34 # 28 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.16/0.34 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.16/0.34 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.16/0.34 # Found 17 unit axioms. % 0.16/0.34 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.16/0.34 # 11 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.16/0.34 # 17 unit axiom clauses % 0.16/0.34 % 0.16/0.34 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.16/0.34 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.16/0.34 # Creating equality axioms % 0.16/0.34 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.16/0.34 # Returning from population with 33 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.16/0.34 # We now have 33 tableaux to operate on % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.35 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.35 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.35 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.35 % 0.16/0.35 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.35 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (r1(esk1_0))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (r1(esk15_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (r1(esk16_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (r2(X1,esk2_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (r2(X1,esk7_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (r2(X1,esk11_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk8_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk12_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk3_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (r2(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (r3(X1,esk7_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (r4(X1,esk11_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (r3(esk12_2(X1,X2),X1,esk9_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=esk1_0|~r1(X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (esk20_1(X1)=X1|esk18_1(X1)=X1)). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~r2(X1,X2)|~r1(X2))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (esk20_1(X1)=X1|r1(esk18_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (~r4(X1,X1,X2)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=esk2_1(X2)|~r2(X2,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (esk18_1(X1)=X1|r2(esk19_1(X1),esk20_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=esk4_2(X2,X3)|~r4(X2,X3,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (r2(esk19_1(X1),esk20_1(X1))|r1(esk18_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=esk3_2(X2,X3)|~r3(X2,X3,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (X1=X2|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X3))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (X90=X90)). % 0.16/0.35 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.35 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.35 # Found 6 steps % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X7))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X7))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_39])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_129, plain, (~r2(X2,esk14_1(X7))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_80])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_208, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_75])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_210, plain, (~r2(X2,esk2_1(X2))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_209, plain, (esk2_1(X2)!=esk14_1(X7)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_209, ...])). % 0.16/0.35 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.35 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.35 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.35 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.35 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.35 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.35 % 0.16/0.35 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.35 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (r1(esk1_0))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (r1(esk15_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (r1(esk16_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (r2(X1,esk2_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (r2(X1,esk7_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (r2(X1,esk11_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk8_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk12_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk3_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (r2(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (r3(X1,esk7_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (r4(X1,esk11_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (r3(esk12_2(X1,X2),X1,esk9_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=esk1_0|~r1(X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (esk20_1(X1)=X1|esk18_1(X1)=X1)). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~r2(X1,X2)|~r1(X2))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (esk20_1(X1)=X1|r1(esk18_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (~r4(X1,X1,X2)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=esk2_1(X2)|~r2(X2,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (esk18_1(X1)=X1|r2(esk19_1(X1),esk20_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=esk4_2(X2,X3)|~r4(X2,X3,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (r2(esk19_1(X1),esk20_1(X1))|r1(esk18_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=esk3_2(X2,X3)|~r3(X2,X3,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (X1=X2|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X3))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (X90=X90)). % 0.16/0.35 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.35 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.35 # Found 6 steps % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (r1(esk1_0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (r1(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_3])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_173, plain, (esk1_0=esk1_0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_80])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_353, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_75])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_354, plain, (~r2(esk1_0,esk2_1(esk1_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_351, plain, (r2(esk1_0,esk2_1(esk1_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_351, ...])). % 0.16/0.35 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.35 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.35 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.16/0.35 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.16/0.35 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.35 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.16/0.35 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.16/0.35 % 0.16/0.35 # End clausification derivation % 0.16/0.35 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (r1(esk1_0))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (r1(esk15_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (r1(esk16_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (r2(X1,esk2_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (r2(X1,esk7_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (r2(X1,esk11_2(X2,X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (r3(X1,esk14_1(X1),X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk8_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk12_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (r4(X1,esk16_1(X1),esk15_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (r4(X1,X2,esk4_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (r3(X1,X2,esk3_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (r2(esk8_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (r3(X1,esk7_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (r4(X1,esk11_2(X1,X2),esk9_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (r3(esk12_2(X1,X2),X1,esk9_2(X1,X2)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=esk1_0|~r1(X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (esk20_1(X1)=X1|esk18_1(X1)=X1)). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~r2(X1,X2)|~r1(X2))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (esk20_1(X1)=X1|r1(esk18_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (~r4(X1,X1,X2)|~r1(X2)|~r1(X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=esk2_1(X2)|~r2(X2,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (esk18_1(X1)=X1|r2(esk19_1(X1),esk20_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (X1=esk4_2(X2,X3)|~r4(X2,X3,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (r2(esk19_1(X1),esk20_1(X1))|r1(esk18_1(X1)))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (X1=esk3_2(X2,X3)|~r3(X2,X3,X1))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (X1=X2|~r2(X2,X3)|~r2(X1,X3))). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (X90=X90)). % 0.16/0.35 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.16/0.35 # Begin printing tableau % 0.16/0.35 # Found 6 steps % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X6))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (r1(esk14_1(X6))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_3])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_125, plain, (esk14_1(X6)=esk1_0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_80])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_439, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_75])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_440, plain, (~r2(esk14_1(X6),esk2_1(esk14_1(X6)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])). % 0.16/0.35 cnf(i_0_437, plain, (r2(esk1_0,esk2_1(esk14_1(X6)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_437, ...])). % 0.16/0.35 # End printing tableau % 0.16/0.35 # SZS output end % 0.16/0.35 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.16/0.35 # Child (6002) has found a proof. % 0.16/0.35 % 0.16/0.35 # Proof search is over... % 0.16/0.35 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------