%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : NUN088+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:37:12 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.46s 0.69s
% Output : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : NUN088+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 22:30:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.46/0.69 % Version: 1.5
% 0.46/0.69 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.69 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(reflexivity,axiom,X48=X48,theory(equality)).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(axiom_1,axiom,(?[Y24]:(![X19]:(((~r1(X19))&X19!=Y24)|(r1(X19)&X19=Y24)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax', axiom_1)).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c77,plain,(?[Y24]:(![X19]:((~r1(X19)&X19!=Y24)|(r1(X19)&X19=Y24)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c78,plain,(?[X46]:(![X47]:((~r1(X47)&X47!=X46)|(r1(X47)&X47=X46)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c77])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c79,plain,(![X47]:((~r1(X47)&X47!=skolem0023)|(r1(X47)&X47=skolem0023))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c78])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c80,plain,(![X47]:(((~r1(X47)|r1(X47))&(~r1(X47)|X47=skolem0023))&((X47!=skolem0023|r1(X47))&(X47!=skolem0023|X47=skolem0023)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c79])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c83,plain,X105!=skolem0023|r1(X105),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c80])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c151,plain,r1(skolem0023),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c83, reflexivity])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(symmetry,axiom,X52!=X51|X51=X52,theory(equality)).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c82,plain,~r1(X80)|X80=skolem0023,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c80])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(zerouneqone,conjecture,(![Y1]:((![Y2]:((~r1(Y2))|Y2!=Y1))|(![Y3]:((~r1(Y3))|(~r2(Y3,Y1)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', zerouneqone)).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(~(![Y1]:((![Y2]:((~r1(Y2))|Y2!=Y1))|(![Y3]:((~r1(Y3))|(~r2(Y3,Y1))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zerouneqone])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(~(![Y1]:((![Y2]:(~r1(Y2)|Y2!=Y1))|(![Y3]:(~r1(Y3)|~r2(Y3,Y1)))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c4])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c6,negated_conjecture,(?[Y1]:((?[Y2]:(r1(Y2)&Y2=Y1))&(?[Y3]:(r1(Y3)&r2(Y3,Y1))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c7,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:((?[X3]:(r1(X3)&X3=X2))&(?[X4]:(r1(X4)&r2(X4,X2))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c8,negated_conjecture,((r1(skolem0002)&skolem0002=skolem0001)&(r1(skolem0003)&r2(skolem0003,skolem0001))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c7])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,r1(skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c8])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,skolem0002=skolem0001,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c8])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c0,axiom,X62!=X63|~r1(X62)|r1(X63),theory(equality)).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c98,plain,~r1(skolem0002)|r1(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c0, c10])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c200,plain,r1(skolem0001),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c98, c9])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c202,plain,skolem0001=skolem0023,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c200, c82])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c209,plain,skolem0023=skolem0001,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c202, symmetry])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,r2(skolem0003,skolem0001),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c8])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(axiom_7a,axiom,(![X7]:(![Y10]:((![Y20]:((~r1(Y20))|Y20!=Y10))|(~r2(X7,Y10))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM008+0.ax', axiom_7a)).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c13,plain,(![X7]:(![Y10]:((![Y20]:(~r1(Y20)|Y20!=Y10))|~r2(X7,Y10)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a])).
% 0.46/0.69 fof(c15,plain,(![X5]:(![X6]:(![X7]:((~r1(X7)|X7!=X6)|~r2(X5,X6))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c14,plain,(![X5]:(![X6]:((![X7]:(~r1(X7)|X7!=X6))|~r2(X5,X6)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c13])).])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c16,plain,~r1(X99)|X99!=X100|~r2(X101,X100),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c146,plain,~r1(X133)|X133!=skolem0001,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16, c12])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c224,plain,~r1(skolem0023),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c146, c209])).
% 0.46/0.69 cnf(c228,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c224, c151])).
% 0.46/0.69 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.46/0.69
% 0.46/0.69 % Initial clauses : 50
% 0.46/0.69 % Processed clauses : 60
% 0.46/0.69 % Factors computed : 2
% 0.46/0.69 % Resolvents computed: 142
% 0.46/0.69 % Tautologies deleted: 5
% 0.46/0.69 % Forward subsumed : 29
% 0.46/0.69 % Backward subsumed : 1
% 0.46/0.69 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.46/0.69 % User time : 0.303 s
% 0.46/0.69 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.46/0.69 % Total time : 0.322 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------