%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : NUN089+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:18:44 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.79s 2.72s
% Output : Refutation 4.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 19
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 3 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 166 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 551 ( 85 ~; 64 |; 62 &; 340 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 10 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 146 ( 0 ^; 106 !; 40 ?; 146 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(r1_decl,type,
r1: $i > $o ).
thf(r2_decl,type,
r2: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(id_decl,type,
id: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(r4_decl,type,
r4: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(r3_decl,type,
r3: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ r1 )
& ( A @ r1 ) )
| ( ~ ( B @ r1 )
& ~ ( A @ r1 ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).
thf(115,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ r1 )
& ( A @ r1 ) )
| ( ~ ( B @ r1 )
& ~ ( A @ r1 ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ id ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( B @ r2 ) )
| ! [D: $i] :
( ~ ( D @ ( A @ r2 ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3a) ).
thf(56,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ id ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( B @ r2 ) )
| ! [D: $i] :
( ~ ( D @ ( A @ r2 ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( B @ id ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ id ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ ( B @ id ) )
| ( C @ ( A @ id ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ id ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).
thf(92,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ id ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
! [D: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( D @ id ) )
& ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) ) )
| ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).
thf(96,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
! [D: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( D @ id ) )
& ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) ) )
| ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ? [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ r2 ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ id ) ) )
| ? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ r1 )
& ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6a) ).
thf(73,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ? [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ r2 ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ id ) ) )
| ? [B: $i] :
( ( B @ r1 )
& ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
! [B: $i] :
( ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ id ) )
& ~ ( B @ r1 ) )
| ( ( B @ r1 )
& ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1) ).
thf(45,plain,
? [A: $i] :
! [B: $i] :
( ( ~ ( A @ ( B @ id ) )
& ~ ( B @ r1 ) )
| ( ( B @ r1 )
& ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( C @ r2 ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ r2 ) ) )
| ( ~ ( D @ ( C @ r2 ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( A @ r2 ) ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).
thf(108,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( C @ r2 ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ r2 ) ) )
| ( ~ ( D @ ( C @ r2 ) )
& ~ ( B @ ( A @ r2 ) ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( C @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
( ? [D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ ( D @ r3 ) ) ) )
& ? [D: $i] :
( ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( E @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( E @ ( B @ r2 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2a) ).
thf(35,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
( ? [D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ ( D @ r3 ) ) ) )
& ? [D: $i] :
( ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( E @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( E @ ( B @ r2 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
! [C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ id ) )
& ~ ( C @ ( A @ r2 ) ) )
| ( ( C @ ( A @ r2 ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
thf(67,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
! [C: $i] :
( ( ~ ( B @ ( C @ id ) )
& ~ ( C @ ( A @ r2 ) ) )
| ( ( C @ ( A @ r2 ) )
& ( B @ ( C @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( A @ r2 ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ r1 )
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7a) ).
thf(58,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( A @ r2 ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( C @ r1 )
| ~ ( B @ ( C @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ? [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ r1 ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4a) ).
thf(51,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ? [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ r1 ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) ) )
| ( ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r3 ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( C @ id ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_10) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) ) )
| ( ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r3 ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( C @ id ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
( ? [D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ r2 ) ) )
& ? [D: $i] :
( ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( E @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( E @ ( B @ r2 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1a) ).
thf(85,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
( ? [D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ r2 ) ) )
& ? [D: $i] :
( ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( E @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( E @ ( B @ r2 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
! [D: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( D @ id ) )
& ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) ) )
| ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).
thf(102,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] :
! [D: $i] :
( ( ~ ( C @ ( D @ id ) )
& ~ ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) ) )
| ( ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ r3 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( D @ id ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) ) )
| ( ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r4 ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( C @ id ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_11) ).
thf(28,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i] :
( ( ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) ) )
| ( ~ ( F @ ( E @ ( D @ r4 ) ) )
& ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ r4 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( F @ ( C @ id ) )
| ~ ( E @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( D @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i] :
( ! [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ r1 )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) )
| ! [B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2 ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2 ) )
| ~ ( C @ r1 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',zerounidtwo) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ! [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ r1 )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) )
| ! [B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2 ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2 ) )
| ~ ( C @ r1 ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(21,plain,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ! [B: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ r1 )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ id ) ) )
| ! [B: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ ( B @ r2 ) )
| ! [C: $i] :
( ~ ( B @ ( C @ r2 ) )
| ~ ( C @ r1 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ? [C: $i] :
( ( C @ r1 )
& ( C @ ( B @ id ) ) )
& ? [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ r1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5a) ).
thf(79,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] :
( ? [C: $i] :
( ( C @ r1 )
& ( C @ ( B @ id ) ) )
& ? [C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ r4 ) ) )
& ( C @ r1 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).
thf(94,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ id ) )
| ~ ( B @ ( A @ id ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(121,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[115,56,42,92,96,73,45,108,35,67,58,51,60,85,102,28,21,79,94]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUN089+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.39 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.39 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:33:14 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.40 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.40/1.21 % [INFO] Parsing done (210ms).
% 1.40/1.22 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.12/1.63 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.12/1.64 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.36/1.73 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 18 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.52/1.80 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 18 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.52/1.87 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.52/1.88 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.52/1.89 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.79/2.72 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.79/2.72 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.79/2.72 % Time passed: 2175ms (effective reasoning time: 1490ms)
% 4.79/2.72 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.79/2.72 % Axioms used in derivation (18): axiom_7, axiom_10, axiom_1a, axiom_4a, axiom_2, axiom_6, axiom_3, axiom_7a, axiom_8, axiom_6a, axiom_5, axiom_3a, axiom_11, axiom_9, axiom_4, axiom_1, axiom_2a, axiom_5a
% 4.79/2.72 % No. of inferences in proof: 40
% 4.79/2.72 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2175 ms resp. 1490 ms w/o parsing
% 4.79/2.79 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.79/2.79 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------