↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUN089+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:19:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  26   ~;  18   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   2 sgn  14   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X20] : id(X20,X20),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

fof(axiom_8,axiom,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ( r1(X27)
        & r1(X26) )
      | ( ~ r1(X27)
        & ~ r1(X26) )
      | ~ id(X26,X27) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).

fof(axiom_7a,axiom,
    ! [X7,Y10] :
      ( ~ r2(X7,Y10)
      | ! [Y20] :
          ( ~ r1(Y20)
          | ~ id(Y20,Y10) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',axiom_7a) ).

fof(zerounidtwo,conjecture,
    ! [Y1] :
      ( ! [Y4] :
          ( ~ r1(Y4)
          | ~ id(Y4,Y1) )
      | ! [Y2] :
          ( ~ r2(Y2,Y1)
          | ! [Y3] :
              ( ~ r2(Y3,Y2)
              | ~ r1(Y3) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',zerounidtwo) ).

fof(zerounidtwo_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [Y1] :
        ( ! [Y4] :
            ( ~ r1(Y4)
            | ~ id(Y4,Y1) )
        | ! [Y2] :
            ( ~ r2(Y2,Y1)
            | ! [Y3] :
                ( ~ r2(Y3,Y2)
                | ~ r1(Y3) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[zerounidtwo]) ).

cnf(c_28,plain,
    id(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_5]) ).

cnf(c_31,plain,
    ( r1(B)
    | ~ r1(A)
    | ~ id(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_8]) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    ( ~ r2(C,B)
    | ~ r1(A)
    | ~ id(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[axiom_7a]) ).

fof(nnf_19,plain,
    ? [Y1] :
      ( ? [Y4] :
          ( r1(Y4)
          & id(Y4,Y1) )
      & ? [Y2] :
          ( r2(Y2,Y1)
          & ? [Y3] :
              ( r2(Y3,Y2)
              & r1(Y3) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[zerounidtwo_neg]) ).

fof(sk_zerounidtwo_neg,plain,
    ( r1(sK2)
    & id(sK2,sK1)
    & r2(sK0,sK1)
    & r2(sK3,sK0)
    & r1(sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(Y1,sK1),skolemize(Y2,sK0),skolemize(Y3,sK3),skolemize(Y4,sK2)],[nnf_19]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    r2(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_zerounidtwo_neg]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    id(sK2,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_zerounidtwo_neg]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    r1(sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_zerounidtwo_neg]) ).

cnf(c_230,plain,
    ( ~ r2(B,A)
    | ~ r1(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_28]) ).

cnf(c_228,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_230,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_231,negated_conjecture,
    ( r1(sK1)
    | ~ r1(sK2) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_232,negated_conjecture,
    r1(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_231]) ).

cnf(c_229,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_228,c_232]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUN089+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:38:26 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.08/0.36  % Process 919124 was started by sandbox on n001,
% 0.08/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 04:38:26 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.08/0.37  
% 0.08/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.08/0.39  
% 0.08/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.08/0.39  
% 0.08/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.08/0.39  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.08/0.39  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.08/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.08/0.39  % Given clauses 46.
% 0.08/0.39  
% 0.08/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------