%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : NUN089+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:51:07 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 4.65s 1.46s % Output : Proof 6.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUN089+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.3.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 09:08:01 EDT 2023 % 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.62 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.62 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.62 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.62 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.62 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.62 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.62 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.62 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.62 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.62 % 0.20/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.65 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.65 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.65 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.65 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.65 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.65 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.65 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.49/1.06 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.49/1.06 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.10 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.10 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.10 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.10 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.83/1.10 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 4.65/1.34 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.65/1.34 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.65/1.35 Prover 2: Proving ... % 4.65/1.35 Prover 0: Proving ... % 4.65/1.36 Prover 5: Proving ... % 4.65/1.36 Prover 6: Proving ... % 4.65/1.36 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.65/1.36 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.65/1.38 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 4.65/1.39 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.65/1.46 Prover 3: proved (808ms) % 4.65/1.46 % 4.65/1.46 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.65/1.46 % 4.65/1.46 Prover 6: proved (806ms) % 4.65/1.46 Prover 0: proved (810ms) % 4.65/1.46 % 4.65/1.46 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.65/1.46 % 4.65/1.47 % 4.65/1.47 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.65/1.47 % 4.65/1.47 Prover 5: proved (807ms) % 4.65/1.47 % 4.65/1.47 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.65/1.47 % 4.65/1.48 Prover 2: proved (810ms) % 4.65/1.48 % 4.65/1.48 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.65/1.48 % 4.65/1.48 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 4.65/1.48 Prover 1: Found proof (size 6) % 4.65/1.48 Prover 4: Found proof (size 4) % 4.65/1.48 Prover 4: proved (815ms) % 4.65/1.48 Prover 1: proved (821ms) % 4.65/1.48 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 4.65/1.48 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 4.65/1.48 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 4.65/1.48 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 5.17/1.50 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 5.17/1.50 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 5.17/1.51 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 5.17/1.51 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 5.17/1.52 Prover 7: stopped % 5.17/1.52 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 5.17/1.53 Prover 13: stopped % 5.17/1.53 Prover 10: stopped % 5.17/1.55 Prover 11: stopped % 6.24/1.58 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.24/1.59 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.24/1.60 Prover 8: stopped % 6.24/1.60 % 6.24/1.60 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 6.24/1.60 % 6.24/1.60 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 6.24/1.61 Assumptions after simplification: % 6.24/1.61 --------------------------------- % 6.24/1.61 % 6.24/1.61 (axiom_7a) % 6.53/1.65 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (r2(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ (r1(v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) % 6.53/1.65 | ~ $i(v0)) % 6.53/1.65 % 6.53/1.65 (zerouneqtwo) % 6.53/1.65 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : (r2(v2, v1) = 0 & r2(v1, v0) = 0 & % 6.53/1.65 r1(v2) = 0 & r1(v0) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0)) % 6.53/1.65 % 6.53/1.65 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 6.53/1.65 -------------------------------------------- % 6.53/1.65 axiom_1, axiom_1a, axiom_2, axiom_2a, axiom_3, axiom_3a, axiom_4, axiom_4a, % 6.53/1.65 axiom_5a, axiom_6a % 6.53/1.65 % 6.53/1.65 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 6.53/1.65 --------------------------------- % 6.53/1.65 % 6.53/1.65 Begin of proof % 6.53/1.65 | % 6.53/1.65 | DELTA: instantiating (zerouneqtwo) with fresh symbols all_11_0, all_11_1, % 6.53/1.66 | all_11_2 gives: % 6.53/1.66 | (1) r2(all_11_0, all_11_1) = 0 & r2(all_11_1, all_11_2) = 0 & r1(all_11_0) % 6.53/1.66 | = 0 & r1(all_11_2) = 0 & $i(all_11_0) & $i(all_11_1) & $i(all_11_2) % 6.53/1.66 | % 6.53/1.66 | ALPHA: (1) implies: % 6.53/1.66 | (2) $i(all_11_2) % 6.53/1.66 | (3) $i(all_11_1) % 6.53/1.66 | (4) r1(all_11_2) = 0 % 6.53/1.66 | (5) r2(all_11_1, all_11_2) = 0 % 6.53/1.66 | % 6.53/1.66 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (axiom_7a) with all_11_1, all_11_2, simplifying % 6.53/1.66 | with (2), (3), (4), (5) gives: % 6.53/1.66 | (6) $false % 6.53/1.67 | % 6.53/1.67 | CLOSE: (6) is inconsistent. % 6.53/1.67 | % 6.53/1.67 End of proof % 6.53/1.67 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 6.53/1.67 % 6.53/1.67 1045ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------