↑ Up

Nitpick---2016.CSA-FMo.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Nitpick---2016
% Problem  : PHI005^3 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s

% Computer : n119.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.75MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 11:35:22 EST 2017

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 24.48s
% Output   : FiniteModel 24.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PHI005^3 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n119.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 22:28:48 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 24.48/14.32  Nitpicking formula...
% 24.48/14.32  Timestamp: 22:28:57
% 24.48/14.32  Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 24.48/14.32  "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 24.48/14.32  Skipping 5000 scopes. (Consider using "mono" or "merge_type_vars" to prevent
% 24.48/14.32  this.)
% 24.48/14.32  Batch 1 of 1000: Trying 5 scopes:
% 24.48/14.32    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 and card bnd_mu = 1
% 24.48/14.32    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 and card bnd_mu = 2
% 24.48/14.32    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 and card bnd_mu = 1
% 24.48/14.32    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 and card bnd_mu = 2
% 24.48/14.32    card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 and card bnd_mu = 3
% 24.48/14.32  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 24.48/14.32  Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 and
% 24.48/14.32  card bnd_mu = 1:
% 24.48/14.32  
% 24.48/14.32    Skolem constants:
% 24.48/14.32      ??.bnd_mbox_generic.V = i1
% 24.48/14.32      \<lambda>Xa. ??.bnd_mforall_indset.X =
% 24.48/14.32        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.48/14.32        (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.48/14.32           (b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)))
% 24.48/14.32      ??.bnd_mvalid.W = i1
% 24.48/14.32    Constants:
% 24.48/14.32      bnd_positive =
% 24.48/14.32        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.48/14.32        ((\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True)) :=
% 24.48/14.32           (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 24.48/14.32         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := False)) :=
% 24.48/14.32           (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False),
% 24.48/14.32         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True)) :=
% 24.48/14.32           (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 24.48/14.32         (\<lambda>x. _)(b1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False)) :=
% 24.48/14.32           (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := False))
% 24.48/14.32      bnd_rel =
% 24.48/14.32        (\<lambda>x. _)
% 24.48/14.32        (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True, i2 := True),
% 24.48/14.32         i2 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False, i2 := True))
% 24.48/14.32  % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 24.48/14.32  Total time: 2.1 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------