↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : PHI009+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 08:22:25 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.44s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  138 (  58   ~;  63   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  35   !;   3   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_the > exemplifies_property > property > object > #nlpp > #skF_1 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_4

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(object,type,
    object: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(property,type,
    property: $i > $o ).

tff(is_the,type,
    is_the: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(exemplifies_property,type,
    exemplifies_property: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(f_69,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [F] :
        ( property(F)
       => ( ? [Y] :
              ( object(Y)
              & exemplifies_property(F,Y)
              & ! [Z] :
                  ( object(Z)
                 => ( exemplifies_property(F,Z)
                   => ( Z = Y ) ) ) )
         => ? [U] :
              ( object(U)
              & is_the(U,F) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',description_theorem_1) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [F,G,X] :
      ( ( property(F)
        & property(G)
        & object(X) )
     => ( ( is_the(X,F)
          & exemplifies_property(G,X) )
      <=> ? [Y] :
            ( object(Y)
            & exemplifies_property(F,Y)
            & ! [Z] :
                ( object(Z)
               => ( exemplifies_property(F,Z)
                 => ( Z = Y ) ) )
            & exemplifies_property(G,Y) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',description_axiom_schema_instance) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    object('#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    property('#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    exemplifies_property('#skF_3','#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [F_1,G_2,X_3,Y_12] :
      ( object('#skF_2'(F_1,G_2,X_3,Y_12))
      | is_the(X_3,F_1)
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_2,Y_12)
      | ~ exemplifies_property(F_1,Y_12)
      | ~ object(Y_12)
      | ~ object(X_3)
      | ~ property(G_2)
      | ~ property(F_1) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_93,plain,
    ! [F_60,G_61,X_62,Y_63] :
      ( exemplifies_property(F_60,'#skF_2'(F_60,G_61,X_62,Y_63))
      | is_the(X_62,F_60)
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_61,Y_63)
      | ~ exemplifies_property(F_60,Y_63)
      | ~ object(Y_63)
      | ~ object(X_62)
      | ~ property(G_61)
      | ~ property(F_60) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [Z_19] :
      ( ( Z_19 = '#skF_4' )
      | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3',Z_19)
      | ~ object(Z_19) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ! [G_61,X_62,Y_63] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3',G_61,X_62,Y_63) = '#skF_4' )
      | ~ object('#skF_2'('#skF_3',G_61,X_62,Y_63))
      | is_the(X_62,'#skF_3')
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_61,Y_63)
      | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3',Y_63)
      | ~ object(Y_63)
      | ~ object(X_62)
      | ~ property(G_61)
      | ~ property('#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_93,c_24]) ).

tff(c_255,plain,
    ! [G_79,X_80,Y_81] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3',G_79,X_80,Y_81) = '#skF_4' )
      | ~ object('#skF_2'('#skF_3',G_79,X_80,Y_81))
      | is_the(X_80,'#skF_3')
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_79,Y_81)
      | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3',Y_81)
      | ~ object(Y_81)
      | ~ object(X_80)
      | ~ property(G_79) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_99]) ).

tff(c_266,plain,
    ! [G_2,X_3,Y_12] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3',G_2,X_3,Y_12) = '#skF_4' )
      | is_the(X_3,'#skF_3')
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_2,Y_12)
      | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3',Y_12)
      | ~ object(Y_12)
      | ~ object(X_3)
      | ~ property(G_2)
      | ~ property('#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_255]) ).

tff(c_275,plain,
    ! [G_82,X_83,Y_84] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3',G_82,X_83,Y_84) = '#skF_4' )
      | is_the(X_83,'#skF_3')
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_82,Y_84)
      | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3',Y_84)
      | ~ object(Y_84)
      | ~ object(X_83)
      | ~ property(G_82) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_266]) ).

tff(c_287,plain,
    ! [X_83] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3','#skF_3',X_83,'#skF_4') = '#skF_4' )
      | is_the(X_83,'#skF_3')
      | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3','#skF_4')
      | ~ object('#skF_4')
      | ~ object(X_83)
      | ~ property('#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_275]) ).

tff(c_298,plain,
    ! [X_85] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3','#skF_3',X_85,'#skF_4') = '#skF_4' )
      | is_the(X_85,'#skF_3')
      | ~ object(X_85) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_28,c_26,c_287]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [U_20] :
      ( ~ is_the(U_20,'#skF_3')
      | ~ object(U_20) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_309,plain,
    ! [X_86] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'('#skF_3','#skF_3',X_86,'#skF_4') = '#skF_4' )
      | ~ object(X_86) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_298,c_22]) ).

tff(c_325,plain,
    '#skF_2'('#skF_3','#skF_3','#skF_4','#skF_4') = '#skF_4',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_309]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [F_1,G_2,X_3,Y_12] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'(F_1,G_2,X_3,Y_12) != Y_12 )
      | is_the(X_3,F_1)
      | ~ exemplifies_property(G_2,Y_12)
      | ~ exemplifies_property(F_1,Y_12)
      | ~ object(Y_12)
      | ~ object(X_3)
      | ~ property(G_2)
      | ~ property(F_1) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_339,plain,
    ( is_the('#skF_4','#skF_3')
    | ~ exemplifies_property('#skF_3','#skF_4')
    | ~ object('#skF_4')
    | ~ property('#skF_3') ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_325,c_8]) ).

tff(c_356,plain,
    is_the('#skF_4','#skF_3'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_30,c_28,c_26,c_339]) ).

tff(c_365,plain,
    ~ object('#skF_4'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_356,c_22]) ).

tff(c_372,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_28,c_365]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : PHI009+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Apr  8 16:28:04 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.44/1.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.85/1.99  
% 3.85/1.99  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------