%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : PHI009+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:30:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.41s 1.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 20
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 68 ( 12 unt; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 307 ( 29 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 402 ( 163 ~; 159 |; 64 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 136 ( 0 sgn 118 !; 18 ?; 47 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( object(X2)
& property(X1)
& property(X0) )
=> ( ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
& is_the(X2,X0) )
<=> ? [X3] :
( exemplifies_property(X1,X3)
& ! [X4] :
( object(X4)
=> ( exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
=> X4 = X3 ) )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
& object(X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',description_axiom_schema_instance) ).
fof(f2,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( property(X0)
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( object(X2)
=> ( exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
=> X2 = X1 ) )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X1)
& object(X1) )
=> ? [X3] :
( is_the(X3,X0)
& object(X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',description_theorem_1) ).
fof(f3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( property(X0)
=> ( ? [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( object(X2)
=> ( exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
=> X2 = X1 ) )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X1)
& object(X1) )
=> ? [X3] :
( is_the(X3,X0)
& object(X3) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f2]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ object(X2)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ property(X0)
| ( ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
& is_the(X2,X0) )
<=> ? [X3] :
( exemplifies_property(X1,X3)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ object(X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
| X4 = X3 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
& object(X3) ) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ object(X2)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ property(X0)
| ( ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
& is_the(X2,X0) )
<=> ? [X3] :
( exemplifies_property(X1,X3)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ object(X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
| X4 = X3 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
& object(X3) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
? [X0] :
( property(X0)
& ? [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ~ object(X2)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| X2 = X1 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X1)
& object(X1) )
& ! [X3] :
( ~ is_the(X3,X0)
| ~ object(X3) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
? [X0] :
( property(X0)
& ? [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ~ object(X2)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| X2 = X1 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X1)
& object(X1) )
& ! [X3] :
( ~ is_the(X3,X0)
| ~ object(X3) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f11,plain,
! [X1,X0,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X1,X0,X2)
| ( ( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| ~ is_the(X2,X0)
| sP0(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
| ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
& is_the(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).
fof(f12,plain,
! [X1,X0,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X1,X0,X2)
| ( ( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| ~ is_the(X2,X0)
| sP0(X0,X1) )
& ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
| ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
& is_the(X2,X0) ) ) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f11]) ).
fof(f13,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2)
| ( ( ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| ~ is_the(X2,X1)
| sP0(X1,X0) )
& ( ~ sP0(X1,X0)
| ( exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
& is_the(X2,X1) ) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f17,plain,
? [X0] :
( property(X0)
& ? [X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( ~ object(X3)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
| X2 = X3 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
& object(X2) )
& ! [X1] :
( ~ is_the(X1,X0)
| ~ object(X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
( property(sK4)
& ! [X3] :
( ~ object(X3)
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,X3)
| sK5 = X3 )
& exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5)
& object(sK5)
& ! [X1] :
( ~ is_the(X1,sK4)
| ~ object(X1) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5]),skolemize(X0,sK4),skolemize(X2,sK5)],[f17]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2)
| ~ sP0(X1,X0)
| is_the(X2,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ object(X2)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ property(X0)
| sP1(X1,X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
property(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f31,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ object(X3)
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,X3)
| sK5 = X3 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f32,plain,
exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
object(sK5),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ is_the(X1,sK4)
| ~ object(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
tcf(c_49,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( is_the(X2,X1)
| ~ sP0(X1,X0)
| ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( sP1(X1,X2,X0)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ object(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).
tcf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ object(X0)
| ~ is_the(X0,sK4) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
tcf(c_61,negated_conjecture,
object(sK5),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).
tcf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = sK5 )
| ~ object(X0)
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).
tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
property(sK4),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).
tcf(c_339,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( is_the(X4,X2)
| ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ object(X5)
| ~ sP0(X2,X0)
| ( X4 != X5 )
| ( X2 != X3 )
| ( X0 != X1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_59]) ).
tcf(c_340,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( is_the(X2,X0)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ property(X0)
| ~ object(X2)
| ~ sP0(X0,X1) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_339]) ).
tcf(c_396,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ property(X3)
| ~ property(X2)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ object(X0)
| ~ sP0(X2,X3)
| ( X2 != sK4 )
| ( X0 != X1 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_340]) ).
tcf(c_397,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ property(sK4)
| ~ property(X0)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ sP0(sK4,X0) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_396]) ).
tcf(c_399,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ sP0(sK4,X0)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ property(X0) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_397,c_64,c_397]) ).
tcf(c_400,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ property(X0)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ sP0(sK4,X0) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_399]) ).
tcf(c_603,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ iPr_def_10
| ~ object(X0) ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[c_400]) ).
tcf(c_604,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ iPr_def_11
| ~ property(X0)
| ~ sP0(sK4,X0) ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[c_400]) ).
tcf(c_605,plain,
( iPr_def_11
| iPr_def_10 ),
inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_400]) ).
tcf(c_606,plain,
( iPr_def_11
| iPr_def_10 ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_605]) ).
tcf(c_607,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ iPr_def_11
| ~ property(X0)
| ~ sP0(sK4,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_604]) ).
tcf(c_608,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ iPr_def_10
| ~ object(X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_603]) ).
tcf(c_610,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = sK5 )
| ~ object(X0)
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63]) ).
tcf(c_611,negated_conjecture,
exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).
tcf(c_612,negated_conjecture,
object(sK5),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).
tcf(c_623,plain,
( ~ iPr_def_11
| ~ property(sK4)
| ~ sP0(sK4,sK4) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_607]) ).
tcf(c_906,plain,
~ iPr_def_10,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_612,c_608]) ).
tcf(c_907,plain,
iPr_def_11,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_606,c_906]) ).
fof(f8,definition,
! [X0,X1] :
( sP0(X0,X1)
<=> ? [X3] :
( exemplifies_property(X1,X3)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ object(X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
| X4 = X3 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
& object(X3) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP0])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).
fof(f9,definition,
! [X1,X0,X2] :
( ~ sP1(X1,X0,X2)
| ( ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
& is_the(X2,X0) )
<=> sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).
fof(f10,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ object(X2)
| ~ property(X1)
| ~ property(X0)
| sP1(X1,X0,X2) ),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f5,f9,f8]) ).
fof(f14,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
| ? [X3] :
( exemplifies_property(X1,X3)
& ! [X4] :
( ~ object(X4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
| X4 = X3 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
& object(X3) ) )
& ( ! [X3] :
( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X3)
| ? [X4] :
( object(X4)
& exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
& X3 != X4 )
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
| ~ object(X3) )
| sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).
fof(f15,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
| ? [X4] :
( exemplifies_property(X1,X4)
& ! [X5] :
( ~ object(X5)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X5)
| X4 = X5 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
& object(X4) ) )
& ( ! [X2] :
( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| ? [X3] :
( object(X3)
& exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
& X2 != X3 )
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| ~ object(X2) )
| sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f14]) ).
fof(f16,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
| ( exemplifies_property(X1,sK3(X0,X1))
& ! [X5] :
( ~ object(X5)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X5)
| sK3(X0,X1) = X5 )
& exemplifies_property(X0,sK3(X0,X1))
& object(sK3(X0,X1)) ) )
& ( ! [X2] :
( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| ( object(sK2(X0,X2))
& exemplifies_property(X0,sK2(X0,X2))
& sK2(X0,X2) != X2 )
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| ~ object(X2) )
| sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X3,sK2(X0,X2)),skolemize(X4,sK3(X0,X1))],[f15]) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| object(sK2(X0,X2))
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| ~ object(X2)
| sP0(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| exemplifies_property(X0,sK2(X0,X2))
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| ~ object(X2)
| sP0(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
| sK2(X0,X2) != X2
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
| ~ object(X2)
| sP0(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).
tcf(c_52,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( sP0(X0,X2)
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X1)
| ( sK2(X0,X1) != X1 ) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
tcf(c_53,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( sP0(X2,X0)
| exemplifies_property(X2,sK2(X2,X1))
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( sP0(X2,X0)
| object(sK2(X2,X1))
| ~ object(X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X1)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
tcf(c_965,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sP0(X0,sK4)
| object(sK2(X0,sK5))
| ~ object(sK5)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,sK5) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_611,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_966,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sP0(X0,sK4)
| object(sK2(X0,sK5))
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,sK5) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_965,c_612]) ).
tcf(c_980,plain,
( sP0(sK4,sK4)
| object(sK2(sK4,sK5))
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_966]) ).
tcf(c_1032,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sP0(X0,sK4)
| exemplifies_property(X0,sK2(X0,sK5))
| ~ object(sK5)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,sK5) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_611,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_1033,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sP0(X0,sK4)
| exemplifies_property(X0,sK2(X0,sK5))
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,sK5) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1032,c_612]) ).
tcf(c_1057,plain,
( sP0(sK4,sK4)
| ( sK2(sK4,sK5) = sK5 )
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5)
| ~ object(sK2(sK4,sK5)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1033,c_610]) ).
tcf(c_1058,plain,
( sP0(sK4,sK4)
| ( sK2(sK4,sK5) = sK5 )
| ~ object(sK2(sK4,sK5)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1057,c_611]) ).
tcf(c_1081,plain,
sK2(sK4,sK5) = sK5,
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1058,c_64,c_62,c_623,c_907,c_980,c_1058]) ).
tcf(c_1191,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sP0(sK4,X0)
| ~ object(sK5)
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,sK5) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1081,c_52]) ).
tcf(c_1192,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sP0(sK4,X0)
| ~ exemplifies_property(X0,sK5) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1191,c_612,c_611]) ).
tcf(c_1195,plain,
( sP0(sK4,sK4)
| ~ exemplifies_property(sK4,sK5) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1192]) ).
tcf(c_1196,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1195,c_907,c_623,c_62,c_64]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PHI009+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.40 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 06:11:37 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.41 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.02/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.02/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.49
% 0.02/0.49 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.02/0.49
% 0.02/0.49 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.02/0.50 % Proving...
% 2.41/1.48 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.41/1.48 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.41/1.48 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.41/1.48 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Parsing...
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 2 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Proving...
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Problem Properties
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 %
% 2.41/1.48 % clauses 16
% 2.41/1.48 % conjectures 4
% 2.41/1.48 % EPR 9
% 2.41/1.48 % Horn 13
% 2.41/1.48 % unary 3
% 2.41/1.48 % binary 5
% 2.41/1.48 % lits 50
% 2.41/1.48 % lits eq 3
% 2.41/1.48 % fd_pure 0
% 2.41/1.48 % fd_pseudo 0
% 2.41/1.48 % fd_cond 1
% 2.41/1.48 % fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.41/1.48 % AC symbols 0
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------
% 2.41/1.48 % Current options:
% 2.41/1.48 % ------
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 %
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % ------ Proving...
% 2.41/1.48 %
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.41/1.48
% 2.41/1.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------