↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : PHI010+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:19:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  215 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   74 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  312 ( 129   ~; 128   |;  46   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   22 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   97 (   7 sgn  59   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(description_is_property_and_described_is_object,axiom,
    ! [X,F] :
      ( is_the(X,F)
     => ( object(X)
        & property(F) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',description_is_property_and_described_is_object) ).

fof(description_axiom_identity_instance,axiom,
    ! [F,X,W] :
      ( ( object(W)
        & object(X)
        & property(F) )
     => ( ( X = W
          & is_the(X,F) )
      <=> ? [Y] :
            ( Y = W
            & ! [Z] :
                ( object(Z)
               => ( exemplifies_property(F,Z)
                 => Z = Y ) )
            & exemplifies_property(F,Y)
            & object(Y) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',description_axiom_identity_instance) ).

fof(lemma_1,conjecture,
    ! [X,F,Y] :
      ( ( object(Y)
        & property(F)
        & object(X) )
     => ( ( X = Y
          & is_the(X,F) )
       => exemplifies_property(F,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',lemma_1) ).

fof(lemma_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,F,Y] :
        ( ( object(Y)
          & property(F)
          & object(X) )
       => ( ( X = Y
            & is_the(X,F) )
         => exemplifies_property(F,Y) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[lemma_1]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( property(B)
    | ~ is_the(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[description_is_property_and_described_is_object]) ).

fof(nnf_4,plain,
    ! [F,X,W] :
      ( ( ( ! [Y] :
              ( Y != W
              | ? [Z] :
                  ( Z != Y
                  & exemplifies_property(F,Z)
                  & object(Z) )
              | ~ exemplifies_property(F,Y)
              | ~ object(Y) )
          | ( W = X
            & is_the(X,F) ) )
        & ( ? [X0] :
              ( X0 = W
              & ! [X1] :
                  ( X1 = X0
                  | ~ exemplifies_property(F,X1)
                  | ~ object(X1) )
              & exemplifies_property(F,X0)
              & object(X0) )
          | W != X
          | ~ is_the(X,F) ) )
      | ~ object(W)
      | ~ object(X)
      | ~ property(F) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[description_axiom_identity_instance]) ).

fof(sk_description_axiom_identity_instance_sk,plain,
    ! [F,X,W] :
      ( ( ( ! [Y] :
              ( Y != W
              | ( sK4(F,X,W,Y) != Y
                & exemplifies_property(F,sK4(F,X,W,Y))
                & object(sK4(F,X,W,Y)) )
              | ~ exemplifies_property(F,Y)
              | ~ object(Y) )
          | ( W = X
            & is_the(X,F) ) )
        & ( ( sK0(F,X,W) = W
            & ! [X1] :
                ( X1 = sK0(F,X,W)
                | ~ exemplifies_property(F,X1)
                | ~ object(X1) )
            & exemplifies_property(F,sK0(F,X,W))
            & object(sK0(F,X,W)) )
          | W != X
          | ~ is_the(X,F) ) )
      | ~ object(W)
      | ~ object(X)
      | ~ property(F) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK4]),skolemize(X0,sK0(F,X,W)),skolemize(Z,sK4(F,X,W,Y))],[nnf_4]) ).

fof(sk_description_axiom_identity_instance,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_2
        | sK4(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3) != VAR_3
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | VAR_2 = VAR_1
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_2
        | exemplifies_property(VAR_0,sK4(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3))
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | VAR_2 = VAR_1
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_2
        | object(sK4(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3))
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | VAR_2 = VAR_1
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_2
        | sK4(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3) != VAR_3
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_2
        | exemplifies_property(VAR_0,sK4(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3))
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 != VAR_2
        | object(sK4(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3))
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2) = VAR_2
        | VAR_2 != VAR_1
        | ~ is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
        ( VAR_3 = sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2)
        | ~ exemplifies_property(VAR_0,VAR_3)
        | ~ object(VAR_3)
        | VAR_2 != VAR_1
        | ~ is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( exemplifies_property(VAR_0,sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2))
        | VAR_2 != VAR_1
        | ~ is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( object(sK0(VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2))
        | VAR_2 != VAR_1
        | ~ is_the(VAR_1,VAR_0)
        | ~ object(VAR_2)
        | ~ object(VAR_1)
        | ~ property(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_description_axiom_identity_instance_sk]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(A,sK0(A,B,C))
    | C != B
    | ~ is_the(B,A)
    | ~ object(C)
    | ~ object(B)
    | ~ property(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_description_axiom_identity_instance]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( sK0(A,B,C) = C
    | C != B
    | ~ is_the(B,A)
    | ~ object(C)
    | ~ object(B)
    | ~ property(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_description_axiom_identity_instance]) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    ( ~ is_the(D,C)
    | sK0(C,A,B) = B
    | B != A
    | ~ is_the(A,C)
    | ~ object(B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    ( ~ is_the(D,C)
    | exemplifies_property(C,sK0(C,A,B))
    | B != A
    | ~ is_the(A,C)
    | ~ object(B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_8]) ).

fof(nnf_5,plain,
    ? [X,F,Y] :
      ( ~ exemplifies_property(F,Y)
      & Y = X
      & is_the(X,F)
      & object(Y)
      & property(F)
      & object(X) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[lemma_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_lemma_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ exemplifies_property(sK1,sK2)
    & sK2 = sK3
    & is_the(sK3,sK1)
    & object(sK2)
    & property(sK1)
    & object(sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X,sK3),skolemize(F,sK1),skolemize(Y,sK2)],[nnf_5]) ).

cnf(c_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ exemplifies_property(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_lemma_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_lemma_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_42,negated_conjecture,
    is_the(sK3,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_lemma_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_43,negated_conjecture,
    object(sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_lemma_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_44,negated_conjecture,
    object(sK3),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_43]) ).

cnf(c_133,plain,
    ( ~ is_the(C,B)
    | sK0(B,A,A) = A
    | A != A
    | ~ is_the(A,B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_33]) ).

cnf(c_83,plain,
    ( ~ is_the(C,B)
    | sK0(B,A,A) = A
    | ~ is_the(A,B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_133]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    ( ~ is_the(C,B)
    | exemplifies_property(B,sK0(B,A,A))
    | A != A
    | ~ is_the(A,B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

cnf(c_88,plain,
    ( ~ is_the(C,B)
    | exemplifies_property(B,sK0(B,A,A))
    | ~ is_the(A,B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_134]) ).

cnf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ~ exemplifies_property(sK1,sK3),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_41,c_40]) ).

cnf(c_114,plain,
    ( sK0(B,A,A) = A
    | ~ is_the(A,B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_83]) ).

cnf(c_117,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(B,sK0(B,A,A))
    | ~ is_the(A,B)
    | ~ object(A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

cnf(c_135,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0(sK1,sK3,sK3) = sK3
    | ~ object(sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_130,negated_conjecture,
    sK0(sK1,sK3,sK3) = sK3,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_135]) ).

cnf(c_136,negated_conjecture,
    ( exemplifies_property(sK1,sK0(sK1,sK3,sK3))
    | ~ object(sK3) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_117,c_42]) ).

cnf(c_137,negated_conjecture,
    ( exemplifies_property(sK1,sK3)
    | ~ object(sK3) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_130,c_136]) ).

cnf(c_138,negated_conjecture,
    exemplifies_property(sK1,sK3),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_137]) ).

cnf(c_132,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_138]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PHI010+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:39:30 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 3366131 was started by sandbox on n009,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 04:39:30 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.09/0.40  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.09/0.40  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.09/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.09/0.40  % Given clauses 38.
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------