↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : PHI010+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:30:29 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.45s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  11 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  211 (  45 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  255 (  92   ~;  85   |;  65   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  106 (   0 sgn  92   !;  14   ?;  24   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( is_the(X0,X1)
     => ( object(X0)
        & property(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',description_is_property_and_described_is_object) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( object(X2)
        & object(X1)
        & property(X0) )
     => ( ( X1 = X2
          & is_the(X1,X0) )
      <=> ? [X3] :
            ( X3 = X2
            & ! [X4] :
                ( object(X4)
               => ( exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
                 => X4 = X3 ) )
            & exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
            & object(X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',description_axiom_identity_instance) ).

fof(f5,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( object(X2)
        & property(X1)
        & object(X0) )
     => ( ( X0 = X2
          & is_the(X0,X1) )
       => exemplifies_property(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lemma_1) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( object(X2)
          & property(X1)
          & object(X0) )
       => ( ( X0 = X2
            & is_the(X0,X1) )
         => exemplifies_property(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f5]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_the(X0,X1)
      | ( object(X0)
        & property(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ object(X2)
      | ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X0)
      | ( ( X1 = X2
          & is_the(X1,X0) )
      <=> ? [X3] :
            ( X3 = X2
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ object(X4)
                | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
                | X4 = X3 )
            & exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
            & object(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ object(X2)
      | ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X0)
      | ( ( X1 = X2
          & is_the(X1,X0) )
      <=> ? [X3] :
            ( X3 = X2
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ object(X4)
                | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
                | X4 = X3 )
            & exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
            & object(X3) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( object(X2)
      & property(X1)
      & object(X0)
      & X0 = X2
      & is_the(X0,X1)
      & ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( object(X2)
      & property(X1)
      & object(X0)
      & X0 = X2
      & is_the(X0,X1)
      & ~ exemplifies_property(X1,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X2,X0,X1)
      | ( ( X1 != X2
          | ~ is_the(X1,X0)
          | sP0(X0,X2) )
        & ( ~ sP0(X0,X2)
          | ( X1 = X2
            & is_the(X1,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X2,X0,X1)
      | ( ( X1 != X2
          | ~ is_the(X1,X0)
          | sP0(X0,X2) )
        & ( ~ sP0(X0,X2)
          | ( X1 = X2
            & is_the(X1,X0) ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2)
      | ( ( X0 != X2
          | ~ is_the(X2,X1)
          | sP0(X1,X0) )
        & ( ~ sP0(X1,X0)
          | ( X0 = X2
            & is_the(X2,X1) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ( object(sK6)
    & property(sK5)
    & object(sK4)
    & sK4 = sK6
    & is_the(sK4,sK5)
    & ~ exemplifies_property(sK5,sK6) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4,sK5,sK6]),skolemize(X0,sK4),skolemize(X1,sK5),skolemize(X2,sK6)],[f13]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_the(X0,X1)
      | object(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_the(X0,X1)
      | property(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X0,X1,X2)
      | X0 != X2
      | ~ is_the(X2,X1)
      | sP0(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ object(X2)
      | ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X0)
      | sP1(X2,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    sK4 = sK6,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    is_the(sK4,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ~ exemplifies_property(sK5,sK6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    is_the(sK6,sK5),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f44,f43]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X2,X1,X2)
      | ~ is_the(X2,X1)
      | sP0(X1,X2) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( property(X1)
      | ~ is_the(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( object(X0)
      | ~ is_the(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sP0(X1,X0)
      | ~ is_the(X0,X1)
      | ~ sP1(X0,X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( sP1(X2,X0,X1)
      | ~ object(X2)
      | ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    ~ exemplifies_property(sK5,sK6),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    is_the(sK6,sK5),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_366,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
      ( sP0(X3,X0)
      | ~ object(X2)
      | ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X4)
      | ~ is_the(X0,X3)
      | ( X3 != X4 )
      | ( X0 != X2 )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_367,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sP0(X1,X0)
      | ~ object(X0)
      | ~ property(X1)
      | ~ is_the(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_366]) ).

tcf(c_369,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sP0(X1,X0)
      | ~ is_the(X0,X1) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_367,c_53,c_52,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_390,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( sP0(X1,X0)
      | ( X1 != sK5 )
      | ( X0 != sK6 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_369,c_66]) ).

tcf(c_391,plain,
    sP0(sK5,sK6),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_390]) ).

tcf(c_770,plain,
    sP0(sK5,sK6),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_391]) ).

tcf(c_773,negated_conjecture,
    ~ exemplifies_property(sK5,sK6),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

fof(f14,definition,
    ! [X0,X2] :
      ( sP0(X0,X2)
    <=> ? [X3] :
          ( X3 = X2
          & ! [X4] :
              ( ~ object(X4)
              | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
              | X4 = X3 )
          & exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
          & object(X3) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP0])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).

fof(f15,definition,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP1(X2,X0,X1)
      | ( ( X1 = X2
          & is_the(X1,X0) )
      <=> sP0(X0,X2) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])],[predicate_definition_introduction]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ object(X2)
      | ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X0)
      | sP1(X2,X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f11,f15,f14]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X2] :
      ( ( ~ sP0(X0,X2)
        | ? [X3] :
            ( X3 = X2
            & ! [X4] :
                ( ~ object(X4)
                | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
                | X4 = X3 )
            & exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
            & object(X3) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( X2 != X3
            | ? [X4] :
                ( object(X4)
                & exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
                & X3 != X4 )
            | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
            | ~ object(X3) )
        | sP0(X0,X2) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
        | ? [X4] :
            ( X1 = X4
            & ! [X5] :
                ( ~ object(X5)
                | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X5)
                | X4 = X5 )
            & exemplifies_property(X0,X4)
            & object(X4) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( X1 != X2
            | ? [X3] :
                ( object(X3)
                & exemplifies_property(X0,X3)
                & X2 != X3 )
            | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
            | ~ object(X2) )
        | sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
        | ( sK3(X0,X1) = X1
          & ! [X5] :
              ( ~ object(X5)
              | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X5)
              | sK3(X0,X1) = X5 )
          & exemplifies_property(X0,sK3(X0,X1))
          & object(sK3(X0,X1)) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( X1 != X2
            | ( object(sK2(X0,X2))
              & exemplifies_property(X0,sK2(X0,X2))
              & sK2(X0,X2) != X2 )
            | ~ exemplifies_property(X0,X2)
            | ~ object(X2) )
        | sP0(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X3,sK2(X0,X2)),skolemize(X4,sK3(X0,X1))],[f21]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
      | sK3(X0,X1) = X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ sP0(X0,X1)
      | exemplifies_property(X0,sK3(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( exemplifies_property(X0,sK3(X0,X1))
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_63,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( sK3(X0,X1) = X1 )
      | ~ sP0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_1037,plain,
    sK3(sK5,sK6) = sK6,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_770,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_1060,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(sK5,sK6)
    | ~ sP0(sK5,sK6) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1037,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1062,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1060,c_773,c_770]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PHI010+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 06:06:48 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.42  % Proving...
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.45/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.45/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % 
% 0.45/1.28  % clauses                               16
% 0.45/1.28  % conjectures                           3
% 0.45/1.28  % EPR                                   9
% 0.45/1.28  % Horn                                  14
% 0.45/1.28  % unary                                 4
% 0.45/1.28  % binary                                6
% 0.45/1.28  % lits                                  38
% 0.45/1.28  % lits eq                               4
% 0.45/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.45/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.45/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.45/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 0.45/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ 
% 0.45/1.28  % Current options:
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 0.45/1.28  % 
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/1.28  
% 0.45/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------