↑ Up

Bliksem---1.12.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:43:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 00:55:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Clauses:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  { ! object( X ), ! property( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { ! exemplifies_property( Y, X ), property( Y ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { ! exemplifies_property( Y, X ), object( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { ! is_the( X, Y ), property( Y ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { ! is_the( X, Y ), object( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { ! object( X ), ! property( Y ), ! object( Z ), ! is_the( X, Y ), ! X = Z
% 0.71/1.09    , exemplifies_property( Y, Z ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { property( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { object( skol2 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { is_the( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { object( skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  { ! exemplifies_property( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  percentage equality = 0.045455, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.71/1.09  This is a problem with some equality
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Options Used:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  useres =            1
% 0.71/1.09  useparamod =        1
% 0.71/1.09  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.71/1.09  useeqfact =         1
% 0.71/1.09  usefactor =         1
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpres =        3
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.71/1.09  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.71/1.09  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.71/1.09  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.71/1.09  selectoldest =      5
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.71/1.09  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  termordering =      kbo
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litapriori =        0
% 0.71/1.09  termapriori =       1
% 0.71/1.09  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.71/1.09  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.71/1.09  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.71/1.09  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litselect =         negord
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  maxweight =         15
% 0.71/1.09  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.71/1.09  maxlength =         115
% 0.71/1.09  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.71/1.09  excuselevel =       1
% 0.71/1.09  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.71/1.09  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  showgenerated =    0
% 0.71/1.09  showkept =         0
% 0.71/1.09  showselected =     0
% 0.71/1.09  showdeleted =      0
% 0.71/1.09  showresimp =       1
% 0.71/1.09  showstatus =       2000
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  prologoutput =     0
% 0.71/1.09  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.71/1.09  totalproof =       1
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  object  [36, 1]      (w:1, o:18, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  property  [37, 1]      (w:1, o:19, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  exemplifies_property  [39, 2]      (w:1, o:44, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  is_the  [40, 2]      (w:1, o:45, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  skol1  [43, 0]      (w:1, o:10, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.71/1.09  skol2  [44, 0]      (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:1), 
% 0.71/1.09  skol3  [45, 0]      (w:1, o:12, a:1, s:1, b:1).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Starting Search:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  (5) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6} I { ! object( X ), ! property( Y ), ! object( Z )
% 0.71/1.09    , ! is_the( X, Y ), ! X = Z, exemplifies_property( Y, Z ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (6) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { property( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (9) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { object( skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (10) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (11) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! exemplifies_property( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (39) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4} R(5,11);r(6) { ! object( X ), ! object( skol3 ), 
% 0.71/1.09    ! is_the( X, skol1 ), ! X = skol3 }.
% 0.71/1.09  (48) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(39);q;r(9) { ! is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (55) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(48);r(10) {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.09  found a proof!
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Unprocessed initial clauses:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  (57) {G0,W4,D2,L2,V1,M2}  { ! object( X ), ! property( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (58) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! exemplifies_property( Y, X ), property( Y )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  (59) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! exemplifies_property( Y, X ), object( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (60) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! is_the( X, Y ), property( Y ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (61) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V2,M2}  { ! is_the( X, Y ), object( X ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (62) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6}  { ! object( X ), ! property( Y ), ! object( Z )
% 0.71/1.09    , ! is_the( X, Y ), ! X = Z, exemplifies_property( Y, Z ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (63) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { property( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (64) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { object( skol2 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (65) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { is_the( skol2, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (66) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { object( skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (67) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  (68) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! exemplifies_property( skol1, skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Total Proof:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (5) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6} I { ! object( X ), ! property( Y ), !
% 0.71/1.09     object( Z ), ! is_the( X, Y ), ! X = Z, exemplifies_property( Y, Z ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (62) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6}  { ! object( X ), ! property( Y ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( Z ), ! is_the( X, Y ), ! X = Z, exemplifies_property( Y, Z ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09     Y := Y
% 0.71/1.09     Z := Z
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09     1 ==> 1
% 0.71/1.09     2 ==> 2
% 0.71/1.09     3 ==> 3
% 0.71/1.09     4 ==> 4
% 0.71/1.09     5 ==> 5
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (6) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { property( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (63) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { property( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (9) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { object( skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (66) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { object( skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (10) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (67) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (11) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! exemplifies_property( skol1, 
% 0.71/1.09    skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (68) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! exemplifies_property( skol1, skol3 )
% 0.71/1.09     }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  eqswap: (79) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6}  { ! Y = X, ! object( X ), ! property( Z
% 0.71/1.09     ), ! object( Y ), ! is_the( X, Z ), exemplifies_property( Z, Y ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[4]: (5) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6} I { ! object( X ), ! property( Y ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( Z ), ! is_the( X, Y ), ! X = Z, exemplifies_property( Y, Z ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09     Y := Z
% 0.71/1.09     Z := Y
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (80) {G1,W12,D2,L5,V1,M5}  { ! skol3 = X, ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    property( skol1 ), ! object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (11) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { ! exemplifies_property( skol1, 
% 0.71/1.09    skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[5]: (79) {G0,W15,D2,L6,V3,M6}  { ! Y = X, ! object( X ), ! property
% 0.71/1.09    ( Z ), ! object( Y ), ! is_the( X, Z ), exemplifies_property( Z, Y ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09     Y := skol3
% 0.71/1.09     Z := skol1
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (83) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4}  { ! skol3 = X, ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[2]: (80) {G1,W12,D2,L5,V1,M5}  { ! skol3 = X, ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    property( skol1 ), ! object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (6) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { property( skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  eqswap: (84) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4}  { ! X = skol3, ! object( X ), ! object( 
% 0.71/1.09    skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (83) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4}  { ! skol3 = X, ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (39) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4} R(5,11);r(6) { ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ), ! X = skol3 }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (84) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4}  { ! X = skol3, ! object( X ), ! object
% 0.71/1.09    ( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 3
% 0.71/1.09     1 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09     2 ==> 1
% 0.71/1.09     3 ==> 2
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  eqswap: (86) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4}  { ! skol3 = X, ! object( X ), ! object( 
% 0.71/1.09    skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[3]: (39) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4} R(5,11);r(6) { ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ), ! X = skol3 }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := X
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  factor: (87) {G1,W8,D2,L3,V0,M3}  { ! skol3 = skol3, ! object( skol3 ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[1, 2]: (86) {G1,W10,D2,L4,V1,M4}  { ! skol3 = X, ! object( X ), ! 
% 0.71/1.09    object( skol3 ), ! is_the( X, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09     X := skol3
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  eqrefl: (88) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { ! object( skol3 ), ! is_the( skol3, 
% 0.71/1.09    skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (87) {G1,W8,D2,L3,V0,M3}  { ! skol3 = skol3, ! object( skol3 )
% 0.71/1.09    , ! is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (89) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (88) {G0,W5,D2,L2,V0,M2}  { ! object( skol3 ), ! is_the( skol3
% 0.71/1.09    , skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (9) {G0,W2,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { object( skol3 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (48) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(39);q;r(9) { ! is_the( skol3, skol1
% 0.71/1.09     ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (89) {G1,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1}  { ! is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09     0 ==> 0
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution: (90) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0[0]: (48) {G2,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} F(39);q;r(9) { ! is_the( skol3, skol1
% 0.71/1.09     ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent1[0]: (10) {G0,W3,D2,L1,V0,M1} I { is_the( skol3, skol1 ) }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  substitution1:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption: (55) {G3,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0} S(48);r(10) {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  parent0: (90) {G1,W0,D0,L0,V0,M0}  {  }.
% 0.71/1.09  substitution0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  permutation0:
% 0.71/1.09  end
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Proof check complete!
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Memory use:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  space for terms:        702
% 0.71/1.09  space for clauses:      2383
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  clauses generated:      92
% 0.71/1.09  clauses kept:           56
% 0.71/1.09  clauses selected:       26
% 0.71/1.09  clauses deleted:        1
% 0.71/1.09  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsentry:          262
% 0.71/1.09  literals s-matched: 219
% 0.71/1.09  literals matched:   219
% 0.71/1.09  full subsumption:   94
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  checksum:           -1867212729
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------