↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:33:53 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 20:18:09 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.20/0.59  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60  % File     : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.20/0.60  % Domain   : Philosophy
% 0.20/0.60  % Problem  : Lemma for Anselm's ontological argument
% 0.20/0.60  % Version  : [Wol16] axioms.
% 0.20/0.60  % English  :
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  % Refs     : [OZ11]  Oppenheimer & Zalta (2011), A Computationally-Discover
% 0.20/0.60  %          : [Wol16] Woltzenlogel Paleo (2016), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.60  % Source   : [Wol16]
% 0.20/0.60  % Names    : descripthm2.p [Wol16]
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.60  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.2.0
% 0.20/0.60  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    5 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Number of atoms       :   20 (   1 equ)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Number of connectives :   16 (   1   ~;   0   |;   6   &)
% 0.20/0.60  %                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   6 avg)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.60  %            Number of variables   :   11 (  10   !;   1   ?)
% 0.20/0.60  % SPC      : FOF_THM_EPR_SEQ
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  % Comments : See http://mally.stanford.edu/cm/ontological-argument/
% 0.20/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60  fof(objects_are_not_properties,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60      ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.60        ( object(X)
% 0.20/0.60       => ~ property(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  fof(exemplifier_is_object_and_exemplified_is_property,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60      ! [X,F] :
% 0.20/0.60        ( exemplifies_property(F,X)
% 0.20/0.60       => ( property(F)
% 0.20/0.60          & object(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  fof(description_is_property_and_described_is_object,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60      ! [X,F] :
% 0.20/0.60        ( is_the(X,F)
% 0.20/0.60       => ( property(F)
% 0.20/0.60          & object(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  fof(lemma_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.60      ! [X,F,Y] :
% 0.20/0.60        ( ( object(X)
% 0.20/0.60          & property(F)
% 0.20/0.60          & object(Y) )
% 0.20/0.60       => ( ( is_the(X,F)
% 0.20/0.60            & X = Y )
% 0.20/0.60         => exemplifies_property(F,Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  fof(description_theorem_2,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.60      ! [F] :
% 0.20/0.60        ( property(F)
% 0.20/0.60       => ( ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.60              ( object(Y)
% 0.20/0.60              & is_the(Y,F) )
% 0.20/0.60         => ! [Z] :
% 0.20/0.60              ( object(Z)
% 0.20/0.60             => ( is_the(Z,F)
% 0.20/0.60               => exemplifies_property(F,Z) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.60  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.60  %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:9)
% 0.20/0.60  %VarNum:23(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.20/0.60  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.20/0.60  %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.60  %SharedTerms:9
% 0.20/0.60  %goalClause: 10 11 12 13 14 15
% 0.20/0.60  %singleGoalClaCount:6
% 0.20/0.60  [10]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.60  [11]P1(a3)
% 0.20/0.60  [12]P4(a2)
% 0.20/0.60  [13]P2(a1,a2)
% 0.20/0.60  [14]P2(a3,a2)
% 0.20/0.60  [15]~P3(a2,a3)
% 0.20/0.60  [16]~P4(x161)+~P1(x161)
% 0.20/0.60  [17]P1(x171)+~P3(x172,x171)
% 0.20/0.60  [18]P1(x181)+~P2(x181,x182)
% 0.20/0.60  [19]P4(x191)+~P3(x191,x192)
% 0.20/0.60  [20]P4(x201)+~P2(x202,x201)
% 0.20/0.60  [21]~P1(x212)+~P1(x213)+~P4(x211)+~P2(x213,x211)+P3(x211,x212)+~E(x213,x212)
% 0.20/0.60  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.60  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.60  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.60  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.60  [4]~P1(x41)+P1(x42)+~E(x41,x42)
% 0.20/0.60  [5]P2(x52,x53)+~E(x51,x52)+~P2(x51,x53)
% 0.20/0.60  [6]P2(x63,x62)+~E(x61,x62)+~P2(x63,x61)
% 0.20/0.60  [7]~P4(x71)+P4(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.20/0.60  [8]P3(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P3(x81,x83)
% 0.20/0.60  [9]P3(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P3(x93,x91)
% 0.20/0.60  
% 0.20/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.61  cnf(22,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~P2(x221,x222)+P3(x222,x221)+~P1(x221)+~P1(x221)+~P4(x222)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(equality_inference,[],[21])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     ($false),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,11,12,13,14,15,16,19,20,6,22]),
% 0.56/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------