↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : PHI011+1 : TPTP v7.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n037.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 29 12:48:20 EDT 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  37   ~;  31   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   2 sgn  21   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( is_the(X1,X2)
     => ( property(X2)
        & object(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpGBfZel/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',description_is_property_and_described_is_object) ).

fof(2,conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( property(X2)
     => ( ? [X3] :
            ( object(X3)
            & is_the(X3,X2) )
       => ! [X4] :
            ( object(X4)
           => ( is_the(X4,X2)
             => exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpGBfZel/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',description_theorem_2) ).

fof(5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( object(X1)
        & property(X2)
        & object(X3) )
     => ( ( is_the(X1,X2)
          & equal(X1,X3) )
       => exemplifies_property(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpGBfZel/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',lemma_1) ).

fof(6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2] :
        ( property(X2)
       => ( ? [X3] :
              ( object(X3)
              & is_the(X3,X2) )
         => ! [X4] :
              ( object(X4)
             => ( is_the(X4,X2)
               => exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[2]) ).

fof(8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ is_the(X1,X2)
      | ( property(X2)
        & object(X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

fof(9,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ is_the(X3,X4)
      | ( property(X4)
        & object(X3) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

fof(10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( property(X4)
        | ~ is_the(X3,X4) )
      & ( object(X3)
        | ~ is_the(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    ( object(X1)
    | ~ is_the(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    ( property(X2)
    | ~ is_the(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

fof(13,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X2] :
      ( property(X2)
      & ? [X3] :
          ( object(X3)
          & is_the(X3,X2) )
      & ? [X4] :
          ( object(X4)
          & is_the(X4,X2)
          & ~ exemplifies_property(X2,X4) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

fof(14,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X5] :
      ( property(X5)
      & ? [X6] :
          ( object(X6)
          & is_the(X6,X5) )
      & ? [X7] :
          ( object(X7)
          & is_the(X7,X5)
          & ~ exemplifies_property(X5,X7) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

fof(15,negated_conjecture,
    ( property(esk1_0)
    & object(esk2_0)
    & is_the(esk2_0,esk1_0)
    & object(esk3_0)
    & is_the(esk3_0,esk1_0)
    & ~ exemplifies_property(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[14]) ).

cnf(16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ exemplifies_property(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

cnf(17,negated_conjecture,
    is_the(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

fof(30,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ object(X1)
      | ~ property(X2)
      | ~ object(X3)
      | ~ is_the(X1,X2)
      | ~ equal(X1,X3)
      | exemplifies_property(X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

fof(31,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ object(X4)
      | ~ property(X5)
      | ~ object(X6)
      | ~ is_the(X4,X5)
      | ~ equal(X4,X6)
      | exemplifies_property(X5,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[30]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
    | X3 != X2
    | ~ is_the(X3,X1)
    | ~ object(X2)
    | ~ property(X1)
    | ~ object(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ object(X2)
    | ~ property(X1)
    | ~ is_the(X3,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[32,11]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
    | X2 != X3
    | ~ object(X2)
    | ~ is_the(X3,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[42,12]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
    | ~ object(X2)
    | ~ is_the(X2,X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[43,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    ( exemplifies_property(X1,X2)
    | ~ is_the(X2,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[44,11]) ).

cnf(46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_the(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[16,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[46,17,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[49,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(51,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    50,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : PHI011+1 : TPTP v7.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.24  % Computer : n037.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.24  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.24  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.24  % DateTime : Tue May 29 11:08:29 CDT 2018
% 0.03/0.24  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.28  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.28  --creating new selector for []
% 0.06/0.35  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpGBfZel/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.35  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpGBfZel/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.35  -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.35  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.35  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.35  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.35  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.35  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.35  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.35  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------