%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : ePrincess---1.0 % Problem : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:45:11 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.64s 1.08s % Output : Proof 2.16s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.12 % Problem : PHI011+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.2.0. % 0.04/0.13 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 2 00:56:38 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.49/0.60 ____ _ % 0.49/0.60 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________ % 0.49/0.60 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/ % 0.49/0.60 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ ) % 0.49/0.60 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/ % 0.49/0.60 % 0.49/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic % 0.49/0.60 (ePrincess v.1.0) % 0.49/0.60 % 0.49/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015 % 0.49/0.60 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015 % 0.49/0.60 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner) % 0.49/0.60 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). % 0.49/0.60 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se % 0.49/0.60 % 0.49/0.60 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/ % 0.49/0.60 % 0.49/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.66/0.65 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 1.27/0.92 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 1.52/1.01 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 1.64/1.08 Prover 0: proved (424ms) % 1.64/1.08 % 1.64/1.08 No countermodel exists, formula is valid % 1.64/1.08 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 1.64/1.08 % 1.64/1.08 Generating proof ... found it (size 4) % 2.16/1.17 % 2.16/1.17 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 2.16/1.17 Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: % 2.16/1.17 | (0) ? [v0] : ? [v1] : ? [v2] : (is_the(v2, v0) & is_the(v1, v0) & property(v0) & object(v2) & object(v1) & ~ exemplifies_property(v0, v1) & ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ is_the(v3, v4) | ~ property(v4) | ~ object(v3) | exemplifies_property(v4, v3)) & ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ is_the(v3, v4) | property(v4)) & ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ is_the(v3, v4) | object(v3)) & ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ exemplifies_property(v4, v3) | property(v4)) & ! [v3] : ! [v4] : ( ~ exemplifies_property(v4, v3) | object(v3)) & ! [v3] : ( ~ property(v3) | ~ object(v3))) % 2.16/1.18 | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2 yields: % 2.16/1.18 | (1) is_the(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) & is_the(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) & property(all_0_2_2) & object(all_0_0_0) & object(all_0_1_1) & ~ exemplifies_property(all_0_2_2, all_0_1_1) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ is_the(v0, v1) | ~ property(v1) | ~ object(v0) | exemplifies_property(v1, v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ is_the(v0, v1) | property(v1)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ is_the(v0, v1) | object(v0)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ exemplifies_property(v1, v0) | property(v1)) & ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ exemplifies_property(v1, v0) | object(v0)) & ! [v0] : ( ~ property(v0) | ~ object(v0)) % 2.16/1.19 | % 2.16/1.19 | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields: % 2.16/1.19 | (2) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ is_the(v0, v1) | object(v0)) % 2.16/1.19 | (3) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ exemplifies_property(v1, v0) | property(v1)) % 2.16/1.19 | (4) property(all_0_2_2) % 2.16/1.19 | (5) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ is_the(v0, v1) | ~ property(v1) | ~ object(v0) | exemplifies_property(v1, v0)) % 2.16/1.19 | (6) ~ exemplifies_property(all_0_2_2, all_0_1_1) % 2.16/1.19 | (7) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ is_the(v0, v1) | property(v1)) % 2.16/1.19 | (8) object(all_0_0_0) % 2.16/1.19 | (9) is_the(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2) % 2.16/1.19 | (10) ! [v0] : ( ~ property(v0) | ~ object(v0)) % 2.16/1.19 | (11) ! [v0] : ! [v1] : ( ~ exemplifies_property(v1, v0) | object(v0)) % 2.16/1.19 | (12) is_the(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2) % 2.16/1.19 | (13) object(all_0_1_1) % 2.16/1.19 | % 2.16/1.19 | Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_2_2, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms is_the(all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2), property(all_0_2_2), object(all_0_1_1), ~ exemplifies_property(all_0_2_2, all_0_1_1), yields: % 2.16/1.20 | (14) $false % 2.16/1.20 | % 2.16/1.20 |-The branch is then unsatisfiable % 2.16/1.20 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 2.16/1.20 % 2.16/1.20 584ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------