↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PHI013+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:33:54 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 7.30s 7.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : PHI013+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 20:17:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.56/0.63  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 7.22/7.41  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.22/7.41  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 7.22/7.41  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 7.22/7.41  % Transform   :cnf
% 7.22/7.41  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 7.22/7.41  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 7.22/7.41  
% 7.22/7.41  % Result      :Theorem 6.700000s
% 7.22/7.41  % Output      :CNFRefutation 6.700000s
% 7.22/7.41  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.30/7.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.30/7.41  % File     : PHI013+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.2.0.
% 7.30/7.41  % Domain   : Philosophy
% 7.30/7.41  % Problem  : Anselm's ontological argument
% 7.30/7.41  % Version  : [Wol16] axioms.
% 7.30/7.41  % English  :
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  % Refs     : [OZ11]  Oppenheimer & Zalta (2011), A Computationally-Discover
% 7.30/7.41  %          : [Wol16] Woltzenlogel Paleo (2016), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 7.30/7.41  % Source   : [Wol16]
% 7.30/7.41  % Names    : ontological.p [Wol16]
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  % Status   : Theorem
% 7.30/7.41  % Rating   : 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0
% 7.30/7.41  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Number of atoms       :   40 (   2 equ)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   4 avg)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Number of connectives :   33 (   2   ~;   0   |;  15   &)
% 7.30/7.41  %                                         (   1 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
% 7.30/7.41  %            Number of variables   :   17 (   9   !;   8   ?)
% 7.30/7.41  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  % Comments : See http://mally.stanford.edu/cm/ontological-argument/
% 7.30/7.41  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.30/7.41  fof(description_theorem_1,axiom,
% 7.30/7.41      ! [F] :
% 7.30/7.41        ( property(F)
% 7.30/7.41       => ( ? [Y] :
% 7.30/7.41              ( object(Y)
% 7.30/7.41              & exemplifies_property(F,Y)
% 7.30/7.41              & ! [Z] :
% 7.30/7.41                  ( object(Z)
% 7.30/7.41                 => ( exemplifies_property(F,Z)
% 7.30/7.41                   => Z = Y ) ) )
% 7.30/7.41         => ? [U] :
% 7.30/7.41              ( object(U)
% 7.30/7.41              & is_the(U,F) ) ) ) ).
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  fof(description_theorem_2,axiom,
% 7.30/7.41      ! [F] :
% 7.30/7.41        ( property(F)
% 7.30/7.41       => ( ? [Y] :
% 7.30/7.41              ( object(Y)
% 7.30/7.41              & is_the(Y,F) )
% 7.30/7.41         => ! [Z] :
% 7.30/7.41              ( object(Z)
% 7.30/7.41             => ( is_the(Z,F)
% 7.30/7.41               => exemplifies_property(F,Z) ) ) ) ) ).
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  fof(description_is_property_and_described_is_object,axiom,
% 7.30/7.41      ! [X,F] :
% 7.30/7.41        ( is_the(X,F)
% 7.30/7.41       => ( property(F)
% 7.30/7.41          & object(X) ) ) ).
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  fof(definition_none_greater,axiom,
% 7.30/7.41      ! [X] :
% 7.30/7.41        ( object(X)
% 7.30/7.41       => ( exemplifies_property(none_greater,X)
% 7.30/7.41        <=> ( exemplifies_property(conceivable,X)
% 7.30/7.41            & ~ ? [Y] :
% 7.30/7.41                  ( object(Y)
% 7.30/7.41                  & exemplifies_relation(greater_than,Y,X)
% 7.30/7.41                  & exemplifies_property(conceivable,Y) ) ) ) ) ).
% 7.30/7.41  
% 7.30/7.41  fof(premise_1,axiom,
% 7.30/7.41      ? [X] :
% 7.30/7.41        ( object(X)
% 7.30/7.42        & exemplifies_property(none_greater,X) ) ).
% 7.30/7.42  
% 7.30/7.42  fof(lemma_2,axiom,
% 7.30/7.42      ( ? [X] :
% 7.30/7.42          ( object(X)
% 7.30/7.42          & exemplifies_property(none_greater,X) )
% 7.30/7.42     => ? [X] :
% 7.30/7.42          ( object(X)
% 7.30/7.42          & exemplifies_property(none_greater,X)
% 7.30/7.42          & ! [Y] :
% 7.30/7.42              ( object(Y)
% 7.30/7.42             => ( exemplifies_property(none_greater,Y)
% 7.30/7.42               => Y = X ) ) ) ) ).
% 7.30/7.42  
% 7.30/7.42  fof(premise_2,axiom,
% 7.30/7.42      ! [X] :
% 7.30/7.42        ( object(X)
% 7.30/7.42       => ( ( is_the(X,none_greater)
% 7.30/7.42            & ~ exemplifies_property(existence,X) )
% 7.30/7.42         => ? [Y] :
% 7.30/7.42              ( object(Y)
% 7.30/7.42              & exemplifies_relation(greater_than,Y,X)
% 7.30/7.42              & exemplifies_property(conceivable,Y) ) ) ) ).
% 7.30/7.42  
% 7.30/7.42  fof(definition_god,axiom,
% 7.30/7.42      is_the(god,none_greater) ).
% 7.30/7.42  
% 7.30/7.42  fof(god_exists,conjecture,
% 7.30/7.42      exemplifies_property(existence,god) ).
% 7.30/7.42  
% 7.30/7.42  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 7.30/7.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.30/7.42  % Proof found
% 7.30/7.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 7.30/7.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 7.30/7.42  %ClaNum:41(EqnAxiom:17)
% 7.30/7.42  %VarNum:108(SingletonVarNum:32)
% 7.30/7.42  %MaxLitNum:6
% 7.30/7.42  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 7.30/7.42  %SharedTerms:13
% 7.30/7.42  %goalClause: 21
% 7.30/7.42  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 7.30/7.42  [18]P1(a1)
% 7.30/7.42  [19]P2(a6,a1)
% 7.30/7.42  [20]P3(a7,a6)
% 7.30/7.42  [21]~P2(a8,a7)
% 7.30/7.42  [22]P5(x221)+~P3(x222,x221)
% 7.30/7.42  [23]P1(x231)+~P3(x231,x232)
% 7.30/7.42  [24]~P1(x241)+~P2(a6,x241)+P1(a9)
% 7.30/7.42  [25]~P1(x251)+~P2(a6,x251)+P2(a6,a9)
% 7.30/7.42  [26]~P1(x261)+~P2(a6,x261)+P2(a2,x261)
% 7.30/7.42  [27]~P1(x271)+P2(a8,x271)+~P3(x271,a6)+P1(f10(x271))
% 7.30/7.42  [28]~P1(x281)+P2(a6,x281)+~P2(a2,x281)+P1(f3(x281))
% 7.30/7.42  [30]~P1(x301)+~P3(x301,a6)+P2(a8,x301)+P2(a2,f10(x301))
% 7.30/7.42  [31]~P1(x311)+~P2(a2,x311)+P2(a6,x311)+P2(a2,f3(x311))
% 7.30/7.42  [39]~P1(x391)+~P3(x391,a6)+P2(a8,x391)+P4(a11,f10(x391),x391)
% 7.30/7.42  [40]~P1(x401)+~P2(a2,x401)+P2(a6,x401)+P4(a11,f3(x401),x401)
% 7.30/7.42  [29]~P1(x291)+~P1(x292)+~P2(a6,x292)+~P2(a6,x291)+E(x291,a9)
% 7.30/7.42  [41]~P1(x411)+~P1(x412)+~P4(a11,x412,x411)+~P2(a6,x411)+~P2(a2,x412)
% 7.30/7.42  [32]~P5(x321)+~P1(x322)+~P2(x321,x322)+~E(f5(x321,x322),x322)+P1(f4(x321))
% 7.30/7.42  [33]~P5(x331)+~P1(x332)+~P2(x331,x332)+P1(f4(x331))+P1(f5(x331,x332))
% 7.30/7.42  [35]~P5(x351)+~P1(x352)+~P2(x351,x352)+P3(f4(x351),x351)+~E(f5(x351,x352),x352)
% 7.30/7.42  [36]~P5(x361)+~P1(x362)+~P2(x361,x362)+P2(x361,f5(x361,x362))+P1(f4(x361))
% 7.30/7.42  [37]~P5(x371)+~P1(x372)+~P2(x371,x372)+P3(f4(x371),x371)+P1(f5(x371,x372))
% 7.30/7.42  [38]~P5(x381)+~P1(x382)+~P2(x381,x382)+P3(f4(x381),x381)+P2(x381,f5(x381,x382))
% 7.30/7.42  [34]~P5(x341)+~P1(x342)+~P3(x342,x341)+~P3(x343,x341)+P2(x341,x342)+~P1(x343)
% 7.30/7.42  %EqnAxiom
% 7.30/7.42  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 7.30/7.42  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 7.30/7.42  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 7.30/7.42  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f10(x41),f10(x42))
% 7.30/7.42  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 7.30/7.42  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63),f5(x62,x63))
% 7.30/7.42  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71),f5(x73,x72))
% 7.30/7.42  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81),f4(x82))
% 7.30/7.42  [9]~P1(x91)+P1(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 7.30/7.42  [10]P2(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x101,x103)
% 7.30/7.42  [11]P2(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P2(x113,x111)
% 7.30/7.42  [12]P3(x122,x123)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x121,x123)
% 7.30/7.42  [13]P3(x133,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x131)
% 7.30/7.42  [14]~P5(x141)+P5(x142)+~E(x141,x142)
% 7.30/7.42  [15]P4(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x151,x153,x154)
% 7.30/7.42  [16]P4(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x161,x164)
% 7.30/7.42  [17]P4(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P4(x173,x174,x171)
% 7.30/7.42  
% 7.30/7.42  %-------------------------------------------
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(42,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a2,a1)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,26])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(44,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (E(a1,a9)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,26,29])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(48,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (E(a9,a1)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,26,29,41,2])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(50,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a6,a9)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,26,29,41,2,10,11])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(51,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P1(a9)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,26,29,41,2,10,11,9])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(52,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P3(x521,a6)+~E(a7,x521)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,20,26,29,41,2,10,11,9,12])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(85,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a6,a7)+~P5(a6)+~P3(a1,a6)+~P1(a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,18,34])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(143,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P1(f10(a7))),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,21,23,27])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1414,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a6,x14141)+P5(x14141)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,22,14])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1415,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P5(a6)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(equality_inference,[],[1414])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1419,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a6,a7)+~P3(a1,a6)+~P1(a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1415,85])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1447,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~P1(a7)+~P3(a1,a6)+P2(a2,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1419,26])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1495,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~P3(a1,a6)+P2(a2,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,1447,23])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1511,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a2,a7)+~E(a7,a1)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1495,52])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1527,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a1,a7)+P2(a2,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1511,2])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1543,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a9,a7)+P2(a2,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[44,1527,3])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1559,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a7,a9)+P2(a2,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1543,2])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1575,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a2,a8)+~E(a7,a9)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,1559,10])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1591,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a7,a1)+~E(a2,a8)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[44,1575,3])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1607,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a8,a2)+~E(a7,a1)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1591,2])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1623,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a7,a9)+~E(a8,a2)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[48,1607,3])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1639,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~P1(a7)+~E(a8,a2)+~P2(a6,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[50,51,1623,29])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1688,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a2,a8)+~P2(a6,a7)+~P1(a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1639,2])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1704,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a2,a8)+~P2(a6,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,1688,23])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(1720,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~E(a8,a2)+~P2(a6,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[1704,2])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3628,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P1(a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,23])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3642,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a6,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[3628,20,1415,34])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3647,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a2,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[3628,21,20,1415,34,1704,1720,10,26])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3649,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~P4(a11,a1,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[3628,21,20,42,1415,18,34,1704,1720,10,26,41])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3673,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (~P4(a11,x36731,a7)+~E(x36731,a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[3647,3642,3628,41,16])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3714,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P2(a2,f10(a7))),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,21,23,30])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3723,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     (P4(a11,f10(a7),a7)),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,21,23,39])).
% 7.30/7.42  cnf(3727,plain,
% 7.30/7.42     ($false),
% 7.30/7.42     inference(scs_inference,[],[3642,3723,3714,143,3649,3628,3673,2,16,41]),
% 7.30/7.42     ['proof']).
% 7.30/7.42  % SZS output end Proof
% 7.30/7.42  % Total time :6.700000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------