↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PHI023+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:58:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  111 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  125 (  49   ~;  47   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   16 (  15 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(essence_involves_existence_exists,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( hasEssence(X1)
        & essenceInvExistence(X1) )
     => exists(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',essence_involves_existence_exists) ).

fof(being_has_essense,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( being(X1)
     => hasEssence(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',being_has_essense) ).

fof(god,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( god(X1)
    <=> ( absolutelyInfinite(X1)
        & being(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PHI002+0.ax',god) ).

fof(if_god_then_exists,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( god(X1)
     => exists(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',if_god_then_exists) ).

fof(self_caused,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( selfCaused(X1)
    <=> ( natureConcOnlyByExistence(X1)
        & essenceInvExistence(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PHI002+0.ax',self_caused) ).

fof(is_in_itself_is_self_caused,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( inItself(X1)
     => selfCaused(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',is_in_itself_is_self_caused) ).

fof(substance,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( substance(X1)
    <=> ( conceivedThruItself(X1)
        & inItself(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PHI002+0.ax',substance) ).

fof(absolutely_infinite,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( absolutelyInfinite(X1)
    <=> ( ( attributeOf(X2,X1)
         => ( expressesInfiniteEssentiality(X2)
            & expressesEternalEssentiality(X2) ) )
        & constInInfAttributes(X1)
        & substance(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PHI002+0.ax',absolutely_infinite) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X7] :
      ( exists(X7)
      | ~ hasEssence(X7)
      | ~ essenceInvExistence(X7) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[essence_involves_existence_exists])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X12] :
      ( hasEssence(X12)
      | ~ being(X12) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[being_has_essense])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ hasEssence(X1)
    | ~ essenceInvExistence(X1)
    | exists(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ being(X1)
    | hasEssence(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X8] :
      ( ( god(X8)
        | ~ absolutelyInfinite(X8)
        | ~ being(X8) )
      & ( ~ god(X8)
        | absolutelyInfinite(X8) )
      & ( ~ god(X8)
        | being(X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[god])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( god(X1)
       => exists(X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[if_god_then_exists]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ essenceInvExistence(X1)
    | ~ being(X1)
    | exists(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ god(X1)
    | being(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X13] :
      ( ( selfCaused(X13)
        | ~ natureConcOnlyByExistence(X13)
        | ~ essenceInvExistence(X13) )
      & ( ~ selfCaused(X13)
        | natureConcOnlyByExistence(X13) )
      & ( ~ selfCaused(X13)
        | essenceInvExistence(X13) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[self_caused])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X20] :
      ( selfCaused(X20)
      | ~ inItself(X20) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[is_in_itself_is_self_caused])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X19] :
      ( ( substance(X19)
        | ~ conceivedThruItself(X19)
        | ~ inItself(X19) )
      & ( ~ substance(X19)
        | conceivedThruItself(X19) )
      & ( ~ substance(X19)
        | inItself(X19) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[substance])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ exists(esk1_0)
    & god(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ essenceInvExistence(X1)
    | ~ god(X1)
    | exists(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ selfCaused(X1)
    | essenceInvExistence(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ inItself(X1)
    | selfCaused(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ substance(X1)
    | inItself(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ( absolutelyInfinite(X15)
        | ~ constInInfAttributes(X15)
        | ~ substance(X15)
        | ~ expressesInfiniteEssentiality(X16)
        | ~ expressesEternalEssentiality(X16) )
      & ( absolutelyInfinite(X15)
        | ~ constInInfAttributes(X15)
        | ~ substance(X15)
        | attributeOf(X16,X15) )
      & ( ~ absolutelyInfinite(X15)
        | ~ attributeOf(X16,X15)
        | expressesInfiniteEssentiality(X16) )
      & ( ~ absolutelyInfinite(X15)
        | ~ attributeOf(X16,X15)
        | expressesEternalEssentiality(X16) )
      & ( ~ absolutelyInfinite(X15)
        | constInInfAttributes(X15) )
      & ( ~ absolutelyInfinite(X15)
        | substance(X15) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[absolutely_infinite])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ god(X1)
    | absolutelyInfinite(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    god(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ selfCaused(X1)
    | ~ god(X1)
    | exists(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ substance(X1)
    | selfCaused(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ absolutelyInfinite(X1)
    | substance(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    absolutelyInfinite(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ substance(X1)
    | ~ god(X1)
    | exists(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    substance(esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ exists(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]),c_0_32])]),c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PHI023+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:31:19 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % sh5l with pid 1907680 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.43  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1907688 completed with status 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.12/0.43  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.12/0.43  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.12/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 21
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 9
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 33
% 0.12/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 33
% 0.12/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 28
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.12/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 27
% 0.12/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.12/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 12
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.12/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 11
% 0.12/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.12/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.12/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 26
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.12/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.12/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 21
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.12/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 42
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 113
% 0.12/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 109
% 0.12/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.12/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1899
% 0.12/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 465
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.12/0.43  
% 0.12/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.43  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.12/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.12/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------