↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : PLA001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:19:52 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 54.09s 27.72s
% Output   : Refutation 54.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   94 (  37 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  252 (  78 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  963 ( 136   ~;  94   |;   0   &; 733   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   23 (  20 usr;  16 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  186 (   0   ^; 186   !;   0   ?; 186   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(at_decl,type,
    at: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(desMoines_decl,type,
    desMoines: $i ).

thf(s_decl,type,
    s: $i > $i ).

thf(none_decl,type,
    none: $i ).

thf(next_to_decl,type,
    next_to: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(lincoln_decl,type,
    lincoln: $i ).

thf(omaha_decl,type,
    omaha: $i ).

thf(saltLakeCity_decl,type,
    saltLakeCity: $i ).

thf(rockSprings_decl,type,
    rockSprings: $i ).

thf(northPlatte_decl,type,
    northPlatte: $i ).

thf(grandIsland_decl,type,
    grandIsland: $i ).

thf(laramie_decl,type,
    laramie: $i ).

thf(winnemucca_decl,type,
    winnemucca: $i ).

thf(elko_decl,type,
    elko: $i ).

thf(cheyenne_decl,type,
    cheyenne: $i ).

thf(wait_at_decl,type,
    wait_at: $i > $i ).

thf(buy_decl,type,
    buy: $i > $i ).

thf(start_decl,type,
    start: $i ).

thf(initial_situation_decl,type,
    initial_situation: $i ).

thf(drive_decl,type,
    drive: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(3,axiom,
    rockSprings @ ( saltLakeCity @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map3) ).

thf(20,plain,
    rockSprings @ ( saltLakeCity @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( E @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',drive2) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( E @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( E @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[34]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_you_gat_get_there_with_bread) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( G @ ( F @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( A @ ( E @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[35,18]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    ! [G: $i,F: $i,E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( G @ ( F @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( E @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[51:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( none @ s )),bind(C,$thf( J )),bind(D,$thf( L )),bind(E,$thf( desMoines )),bind(F,$thf( J @ s @ s )),bind(G,$thf( L @ ( desMoines @ drive ) ))]]) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[52]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( rockSprings @ ( saltLakeCity @ next_to ) )
       != ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[20,57]) ).

thf(78,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( rockSprings @ ( saltLakeCity @ next_to ) )
       != ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( rockSprings != A )
      | ( saltLakeCity != desMoines )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[78]) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( saltLakeCity != desMoines )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( rockSprings @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[80]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    elko @ ( winnemucca @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map1) ).

thf(23,plain,
    elko @ ( winnemucca @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( elko @ ( winnemucca @ next_to ) )
       != ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[23,57]) ).

thf(74,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( elko @ ( winnemucca @ next_to ) )
       != ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[73]) ).

thf(81,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( elko != A )
      | ( winnemucca != desMoines )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

thf(85,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( winnemucca != desMoines )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( elko @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[81]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    cheyenne @ ( laramie @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map5) ).

thf(26,plain,
    cheyenne @ ( laramie @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial) ).

thf(33,plain,
    initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ buy @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',buy_in_city) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ buy @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ buy @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[31]) ).

thf(397,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ buy @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,32]) ).

thf(398,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ buy @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[397]) ).

thf(399,plain,
    initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[398:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( none )),bind(C,$thf( start )),bind(D,$thf( initial_situation ))]]) ).

thf(431,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[399,57]) ).

thf(432,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[431]) ).

thf(433,plain,
    ~ ( cheyenne @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[432:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( start @ s )),bind(C,$thf( initial_situation @ buy ))]]) ).

thf(466,plain,
    ( ( ( cheyenne @ ( laramie @ next_to ) )
     != ( cheyenne @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
    | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[26,433]) ).

thf(467,plain,
    ( ( cheyenne @ ( laramie @ next_to ) )
   != ( cheyenne @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[466]) ).

thf(482,plain,
    ( ( cheyenne != cheyenne )
    | ( laramie != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[467]) ).

thf(484,plain,
    laramie != desMoines,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[482]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    omaha @ ( lincoln @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map9) ).

thf(19,plain,
    omaha @ ( lincoln @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(75,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( omaha @ ( lincoln @ next_to ) )
       != ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[19,57]) ).

thf(76,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( omaha @ ( lincoln @ next_to ) )
       != ( A @ ( desMoines @ next_to ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[75]) ).

thf(82,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( omaha != A )
      | ( lincoln != desMoines )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( none @ s @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[76]) ).

thf(86,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( lincoln != desMoines )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( omaha @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[82]) ).

thf(427,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( omaha @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( lincoln != desMoines )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[399,86]) ).

thf(428,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( omaha @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( lincoln != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[427]) ).

thf(445,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy )
       != B )
      | ( ( start @ s )
       != A )
      | ( ( none @ s )
       != ( none @ s ) )
      | ( cheyenne != omaha )
      | ( lincoln != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[428]) ).

thf(451,plain,
    ( ( cheyenne != omaha )
    | ( lincoln != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[445]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wait_in_city) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[28]) ).

thf(221,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,29]) ).

thf(222,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[221]) ).

thf(223,plain,
    initial_situation @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[222:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( none )),bind(C,$thf( start )),bind(D,$thf( initial_situation ))]]) ).

thf(240,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[223,29]) ).

thf(241,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[240]) ).

thf(242,plain,
    initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[241:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( none )),bind(C,$thf( start @ s )),bind(D,$thf( initial_situation @ wait_at ))]]) ).

thf(267,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[242,29]) ).

thf(268,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[267]) ).

thf(269,plain,
    initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[268:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( none )),bind(C,$thf( start @ s @ s )),bind(D,$thf( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at ))]]) ).

thf(294,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[269,29]) ).

thf(295,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[294]) ).

thf(296,plain,
    initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[295:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( none )),bind(C,$thf( start @ s @ s @ s )),bind(D,$thf( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at ))]]) ).

thf(321,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[296,29]) ).

thf(322,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( D @ wait_at @ ( C @ s @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[321]) ).

thf(323,plain,
    initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ ( start @ s @ s @ s @ s @ s @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[322:[bind(A,$thf( cheyenne )),bind(B,$thf( none )),bind(C,$thf( start @ s @ s @ s @ s )),bind(D,$thf( initial_situation @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at @ wait_at ))]]) ).

thf(144,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( elko @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( winnemucca != desMoines )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,85]) ).

thf(145,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( elko @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( winnemucca != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[144]) ).

thf(157,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( initial_situation != B )
      | ( start != A )
      | ( ( none @ s )
       != none )
      | ( cheyenne != elko )
      | ( winnemucca != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[145]) ).

thf(163,plain,
    ( ( ( none @ s )
     != none )
    | ( cheyenne != elko )
    | ( winnemucca != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[157]) ).

thf(429,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[399,18]) ).

thf(430,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( initial_situation @ buy @ ( start @ s @ ( none @ s @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
     != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( desMoines @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[429]) ).

thf(448,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ buy )
       != B )
      | ( ( start @ s )
       != A )
      | ( ( none @ s )
       != ( none @ s ) )
      | ( cheyenne != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[430]) ).

thf(449,plain,
    cheyenne != desMoines,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[448]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    lincoln @ ( grandIsland @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map8) ).

thf(24,plain,
    lincoln @ ( grandIsland @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    northPlatte @ ( cheyenne @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map6) ).

thf(25,plain,
    northPlatte @ ( cheyenne @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    grandIsland @ ( northPlatte @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map7) ).

thf(21,plain,
    grandIsland @ ( northPlatte @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(142,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( rockSprings @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( saltLakeCity != desMoines )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[33,84]) ).

thf(143,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( initial_situation @ ( start @ ( none @ ( cheyenne @ at ) ) ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ ( none @ s @ ( rockSprings @ at ) ) ) ) )
      | ( saltLakeCity != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[142]) ).

thf(159,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( initial_situation != B )
      | ( start != A )
      | ( ( none @ s )
       != none )
      | ( cheyenne != rockSprings )
      | ( saltLakeCity != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[143]) ).

thf(165,plain,
    ( ( ( none @ s )
     != none )
    | ( cheyenne != rockSprings )
    | ( saltLakeCity != desMoines ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[159]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    laramie @ ( rockSprings @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map4) ).

thf(22,plain,
    laramie @ ( rockSprings @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    saltLakeCity @ ( elko @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map2) ).

thf(27,plain,
    saltLakeCity @ ( elko @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( A @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',drive1) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [E: $i,D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( E @ drive ) @ ( C @ s @ s @ ( B @ ( E @ at ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( E @ ( A @ next_to ) )
      | ~ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ at ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    desMoines @ ( omaha @ next_to ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',map10) ).

thf(30,plain,
    desMoines @ ( omaha @ next_to ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(13555,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[84,85,484,86,451,323,18,31,433,242,163,449,269,24,25,20,57,29,28,21,165,33,296,17,32,34,22,27,399,223,35,26,23,36,30,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PLA001-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/15.62  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/15.62  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/15.62  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/15.62  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/15.62  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/15.63  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/15.63  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/15.63  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 04:42:22 UTC 2026
% 0.14/15.63  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/15.63  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.00/16.21  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.38/16.40  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (183ms). 
% 1.38/16.41  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.00/16.82  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.00/16.83  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.19/16.92  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 15 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.19/17.00  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 15 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.19/17.02  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.19/17.02  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.19/17.03  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 54.09/27.72  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 54.09/27.72  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 54.09/27.72  % Time passed: 11948ms (effective reasoning time: 11301ms)
% 54.09/27.72  % Axioms used in derivation (15): map7, map8, map9, map3, map10, map6, map1, map4, initial, drive2, map5, wait_in_city, buy_in_city, drive1, map2
% 54.09/27.72  % No. of inferences in proof: 94
% 54.09/27.72  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 11948 ms resp. 11301 ms w/o parsing
% 54.09/27.79  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 54.09/27.79  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------