%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : PLA002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:58:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 10 unt; 2 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 58 ( 0 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 17 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(walk_b_to_a,hypothesis,
( ~ at(b,X1)
| at(a,walk(a,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',walk_b_to_a) ).
cnf(prove_you_can_get_to_a,negated_conjecture,
~ at(a,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_you_can_get_to_a) ).
cnf(cross_river_c_to_b,hypothesis,
( ~ at(c,X1)
| ~ cold(X1)
| at(b,skate(b,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cross_river_c_to_b) ).
cnf(warm_or_cold,hypothesis,
( cold(X2)
| warm(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',warm_or_cold) ).
cnf(go_d_to_c,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X1)
| at(c,go(c,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',go_d_to_c) ).
cnf(go_f_to_d,hypothesis,
( ~ at(f,X1)
| at(d,go(d,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',go_f_to_d) ).
cnf(climb_mountain_d_to_b,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X1)
| ~ warm(X1)
| at(b,climb(b,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',climb_mountain_d_to_b) ).
cnf(initial,hypothesis,
at(f,s0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',initial) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
( ~ at(b,X1)
| at(a,walk(a,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[walk_b_to_a]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ at(a,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_you_can_get_to_a]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
( ~ at(c,X1)
| ~ cold(X1)
| at(b,skate(b,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cross_river_c_to_b]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
( ~ at(b,X1)
| at(a,walk(a,X1)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ at(a,X1),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
( ~ at(c,X1)
| ~ cold(X1)
| at(b,skate(b,X1)) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
~ at(b,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
( ~ cold(X1)
| ~ at(c,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( cold(X2)
| warm(X1) ),
warm_or_cold ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X1)
| at(c,go(c,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[go_d_to_c]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
( ~ at(c,X2)
| warm(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X1)
| at(c,go(c,X1)) ),
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
( ~ at(f,X1)
| at(d,go(d,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[go_f_to_d]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X2)
| warm(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( ~ at(f,X1)
| at(d,go(d,X1)) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X1)
| ~ warm(X1)
| at(b,climb(b,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[climb_mountain_d_to_b]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
( ~ at(f,X2)
| warm(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
at(f,s0),
initial ).
cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
( ~ at(d,X1)
| ~ warm(X1)
| at(b,climb(b,X1)) ),
c_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
warm(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
~ at(d,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
~ at(f,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PLA002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.42 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:33:15 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.54 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % sh5l with pid 3316994 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.24/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.24/0.54 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3316998 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.24/0.54 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.24/0.54 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.54 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.54 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.54 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/0.54
% 0.24/0.54 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.54 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.54 % Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.24/0.54 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Initial clauses : 17
% 0.24/0.54 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.24/0.54 % Processed clauses : 24
% 0.24/0.54 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.24/0.54 % ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.24/0.54 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.24/0.54 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.24/0.54 % Generated clauses : 12
% 0.24/0.54 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.24/0.54 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Paramodulations : 11
% 0.24/0.54 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.24/0.54 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.54 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.24/0.54 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.54 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.24/0.54 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.54 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.24/0.54 % ...number of literals in the above : 4
% 0.24/0.54 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Current number of archived clauses : 12
% 0.24/0.54 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27
% 0.24/0.54 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.24/0.54 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.24/0.54 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.24/0.54 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.24/0.54 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.24/0.54 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.54 % Termbank termtop insertions : 629
% 0.24/0.54 % Search garbage collected termcells : 33
% 0.24/0.54
% 0.24/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.54 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.54 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.54 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.24/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.24/0.54
% 0.24/0.54 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.54 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.54 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.54 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.54 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.24/0.54 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------