%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : PLA002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Mon Jul 18 16:56:37 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.35s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.09 % Problem : PLA002-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0. % 0.03/0.09 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu % 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Tue May 31 19:34:28 EDT 2022 % 0.09/0.28 % CPUTime : % 0.09/0.30 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.09/0.30 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN % 0.09/0.30 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.09/0.30 # % 0.09/0.30 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.09/0.30 # Number of axioms: 23 Number of unprocessed: 21 % 0.09/0.30 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.09/0.30 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.09/0.30 # Hello from C++ % 0.09/0.30 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.09/0.30 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.09/0.30 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.09/0.30 # 21 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.09/0.30 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.09/0.30 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.09/0.30 # Found 2 unit axioms. % 0.09/0.30 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.09/0.30 # 19 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.09/0.30 # 2 unit axiom clauses % 0.09/0.30 % 0.09/0.30 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.09/0.30 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.09/0.30 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.09/0.30 # Returning from population with 40 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.09/0.30 # We now have 40 tableaux to operate on % 0.14/0.35 # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 4 total successful branch saturations. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.14/0.35 # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.14/0.35 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.35 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.14/0.35 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.14/0.35 % 0.14/0.35 # End clausification derivation % 0.14/0.35 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (situation(s0))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (at(f,s0))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (~at(a,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_40, hypothesis, (situation(walk(X1,X2))|~situation(X2))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (situation(drive(X1,X2))|~situation(X2))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_24, hypothesis, (cold(X1)|warm(X2)|~situation(X1)|~situation(X2))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (situation(skate(X1,X2))|~situation(X2))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (situation(climb(X1,X2))|~situation(X2))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (situation(go(X1,X2))|~situation(X2))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_27, hypothesis, (at(a,walk(a,X1))|~at(b,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_28, hypothesis, (at(a,drive(a,X1))|~at(b,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_34, hypothesis, (at(c,go(c,X1))|~at(d,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_36, hypothesis, (at(c,go(c,X1))|~at(e,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_33, hypothesis, (at(d,go(d,X1))|~at(c,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_38, hypothesis, (at(d,go(d,X1))|~at(f,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_35, hypothesis, (at(e,go(e,X1))|~at(c,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_37, hypothesis, (at(f,go(f,X1))|~at(d,X1)|~situation(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_30, hypothesis, (at(b,skate(b,X1))|~at(c,X1)|~situation(X1)|~cold(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_32, hypothesis, (at(b,climb(b,X1))|~at(d,X1)|~situation(X1)|~warm(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_29, hypothesis, (at(c,skate(c,X1))|~at(b,X1)|~situation(X1)|~cold(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_31, hypothesis, (at(d,climb(d,X1))|~at(b,X1)|~situation(X1)|~warm(X1))). % 0.14/0.35 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.14/0.35 # Begin printing tableau % 0.14/0.35 # Found 7 steps % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_39, hypothesis, (situation(s0)), inference(start_rule)). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_105, plain, (situation(s0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_205, plain, (at(b,climb(b,s0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_206, plain, (~at(d,s0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_206, ...])). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_208, plain, (~warm(s0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_208, ...])). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_233, plain, (at(a,walk(a,climb(b,s0)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_233, ...])). % 0.14/0.35 cnf(i_0_235, plain, (~situation(climb(b,s0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_235, ...])). % 0.14/0.35 # End printing tableau % 0.14/0.35 # SZS output end % 0.14/0.35 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.14/0.35 # Child (5628) has found a proof. % 0.14/0.35 % 0.14/0.35 # Proof search is over... % 0.14/0.35 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------