%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : PLA006-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:36:38 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.34s % Output : Refutation 0.34s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4631/PLA/PLA006-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ............................... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 126] [nf = 0] [nu = 48] [ut = 38] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 43130] [nf = 2] [nu = 35053] [ut = 3540] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(),table_0()),x0) % B9: differ_2(c_0(),table_0()) % B28: ~holds_2(clear_1(x1),x2) | ~holds_2(holding_1(x0),x2) | holds_2(on_2(x0,x1),do_2(putdown_2(x0,x1),x2)) % B30: ~differ_2(x0,table_0()) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x0),x1) | ~holds_2(empty_0(),x1) | holds_2(holding_1(x0),do_2(pickup_1(x0),x1)) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U1: < d0 v1 dv1 f1 c1 t3 td2 b > holds_2(clear_1(table_0()),x0) % U12: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b > holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) % U15: < d0 v0 dv0 f1 c2 t3 td2 b > holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) % U38: < d2 v1 dv1 f1 c1 t3 td2 > ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),x0) % U3550: < d3 v0 dv0 f3 c3 t6 td3 > holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),do_2(pickup_1(c_0()),s0_0())) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U1: % holds_2(clear_1(table_0()),x0) ....... U1 % Derivation of unit clause U12: % holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) ....... U12 % Derivation of unit clause U15: % holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) ....... U15 % Derivation of unit clause U38: % ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(),table_0()),x0) ....... B0 % ~holds_2(clear_1(x1),x2) | ~holds_2(holding_1(x0),x2) | holds_2(on_2(x0,x1),do_2(putdown_2(x0,x1),x2)) ....... B28 % ~holds_2(clear_1(table_0()), x0) | ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B28:L2] % holds_2(clear_1(table_0()),x0) ....... U1 % ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), x0) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U3550: % differ_2(c_0(),table_0()) ....... B9 % ~differ_2(x0,table_0()) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x0),x1) | ~holds_2(empty_0(),x1) | holds_2(holding_1(x0),do_2(pickup_1(x0),x1)) ....... B30 % ~holds_2(clear_1(c_0()), x0) | ~holds_2(empty_0(), x0) | holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), do_2(pickup_1(c_0()), x0)) ....... R1 [B9:L0, B30:L0] % holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) ....... U15 % ~holds_2(empty_0(), s0_0()) | holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), do_2(pickup_1(c_0()), s0_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U15:L0] % holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) ....... U12 % holds_2(holding_1(c_0()), do_2(pickup_1(c_0()), s0_0())) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U12:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),do_2(pickup_1(c_0()),s0_0())) ....... U3550 % ~holds_2(holding_1(c_0()),x0) ....... U38 % [] ....... R1 [U3550:L0, U38:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 52098 % resolvents: 52083 factors: 15 % Number of unit clauses generated: 43542 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 83.58 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 20 [1] = 18 [2] = 3502 [3] = 11 % Total = 3551 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 43542 [2] = 8274 [3] = 282 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] differ_2 (+)20 (-)0 % [1] holds_2 (+)3529 (-)2 % ------------------ % Total: (+)3549 (-)2 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 3551 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1815 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 52103 % Number of unification failures: 8514 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 7057 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 639312 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 602 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 9 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 31890 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 20960 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 12 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 5 % Number of states in UCFA table: 7735 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 38250 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.07 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.20 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 50 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 60617 % ConstructUnitClause() = 35421 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.05 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 0 secs % CPU time: 0.34 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------