↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : PLA017-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:31:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 1.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  16 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  36   ~;  28   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  29   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ differ(X0,table)
      | ~ holds(clear(X0),X1)
      | ~ holds(empty,X1)
      | holds(holding(X0),do(pickup(X0),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-0.ax',pickup_1) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ differ(X0,X1)
      | ~ holds(clear(X0),X2)
      | holds(clear(X0),do(pickup(X1),X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-0.ax',pickup_4) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ holds(clear(X1),X2)
      | ~ holds(holding(X0),X2)
      | holds(on(X0,X1),do(putdown(X0,X1),X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-0.ax',putdown_2) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ differ(X1,X0)
      | differ(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-1.ax',symmetry_of_differ) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    differ(a,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-1.ax',differ_a_c) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    differ(a,table),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-1.ax',differ_a_table) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    holds(clear(a),s0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-1.ax',initial_state5) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    holds(clear(c),s0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-1.ax',initial_state7) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    holds(empty,s0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/PLA001-1.ax',initial_state8) ).

fof(f31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0] : ~ holds(on(a,c),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_AC) ).

tcf(c_81,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( holds(holding(X0),do(pickup(X0),X1))
      | ~ differ(X0,table)
      | ~ holds(empty,X1)
      | ~ holds(clear(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_84,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( holds(clear(X0),do(pickup(X2),X1))
      | ~ differ(X0,X2)
      | ~ holds(clear(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( holds(on(X2,X0),do(putdown(X2,X0),X1))
      | ~ holds(holding(X2),X1)
      | ~ holds(clear(X0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_90,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( differ(X1,X0)
      | ~ differ(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_92,plain,
    differ(a,c),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_94,plain,
    differ(a,table),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    holds(clear(a),s0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

tcf(c_107,plain,
    holds(clear(c),s0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_108,plain,
    holds(empty,s0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ holds(on(a,c),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_329,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = on(a,c),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_330,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ holds(iPr_def_10,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_329]) ).

tcf(c_630,plain,
    differ(c,a),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_92,c_90]) ).

tcf(c_701,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( holds(iPr_def_10,do(putdown(a,c),X0))
      | ~ holds(holding(a),X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(c),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_329,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_702,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ holds(holding(a),X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(c),X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_701,c_330]) ).

tcf(c_711,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ differ(c,X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(c),X1)
      | ~ holds(holding(a),do(pickup(X0),X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_702]) ).

tcf(c_752,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ differ(c,a)
      | ~ differ(a,table)
      | ~ holds(empty,X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(c),X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(a),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_711]) ).

tcf(c_753,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ holds(empty,X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(c),X0)
      | ~ holds(clear(a),X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_752,c_630,c_94]) ).

tcf(c_764,plain,
    ( ~ holds(empty,s0)
    | ~ holds(clear(a),s0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_753]) ).

tcf(c_769,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_764,c_108,c_105]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PLA017-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/0.32  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.32  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.32  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.32  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 06:13:21 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.32  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.34  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.34  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  
% 0.09/0.35  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.35  
% 0.09/0.35  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.36  % Proving...
% 0.22/1.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.22/1.09  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.22/1.09  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Proving...
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % 
% 0.22/1.09  % clauses                               31
% 0.22/1.09  % conjectures                           1
% 0.22/1.09  % EPR                                   13
% 0.22/1.09  % Horn                                  31
% 0.22/1.09  % unary                                 21
% 0.22/1.09  % binary                                2
% 0.22/1.09  % lits                                  51
% 0.22/1.09  % lits eq                               1
% 0.22/1.09  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.22/1.09  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.22/1.09  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.22/1.09  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.22/1.09  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ 
% 0.22/1.09  % Current options:
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % ------ Proving...
% 0.22/1.09  % 
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.09  
% 0.22/1.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------