%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : PLA020-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:47:32 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.28s % Output : Refutation 0.28s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21704/PLA/PLA020-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing ............................... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 125] [nf = 0] [nu = 46] [ut = 38] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 1 secs [nr = 43138] [nf = 2] [nu = 35057] [ut = 3541] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~holds_2(clear_1(d_0()),x0) % B29: ~holds_2(empty_0(),x2) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x1),x2) | ~holds_2(on_2(x1,x0),x2) | holds_2(clear_1(x0),do_2(pickup_1(x1),x2)) % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U12: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b > holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) % U15: < d0 v0 dv0 f1 c2 t3 td2 b > holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) % U18: < d0 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 b > holds_2(on_2(c_0(),d_0()),s0_0()) % U3544: < d3 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(),d_0()),s0_0()) % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U12: % holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) ....... U12 % Derivation of unit clause U15: % holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) ....... U15 % Derivation of unit clause U18: % holds_2(on_2(c_0(),d_0()),s0_0()) ....... U18 % Derivation of unit clause U3544: % ~holds_2(clear_1(d_0()),x0) ....... B0 % ~holds_2(empty_0(),x2) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x1),x2) | ~holds_2(on_2(x1,x0),x2) | holds_2(clear_1(x0),do_2(pickup_1(x1),x2)) ....... B29 % ~holds_2(empty_0(), x0) | ~holds_2(clear_1(x1), x0) | ~holds_2(on_2(x1, d_0()), x0) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B29:L3] % holds_2(empty_0(),s0_0()) ....... U12 % ~holds_2(clear_1(x0), s0_0()) | ~holds_2(on_2(x0, d_0()), s0_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U12:L0] % holds_2(clear_1(c_0()),s0_0()) ....... U15 % ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(), d_0()), s0_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U15:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % ~holds_2(on_2(c_0(),d_0()),s0_0()) ....... U3544 % holds_2(on_2(c_0(),d_0()),s0_0()) ....... U18 % [] ....... R1 [U3544:L0, U18:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 43319 % resolvents: 43313 factors: 6 % Number of unit clauses generated: 35214 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 81.29 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 20 [1] = 18 [2] = 3503 [3] = 4 % Total = 3545 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 35214 [2] = 8068 [3] = 37 % Average size of a generated clause: 2.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] differ_2 (+)20 (-)0 % [1] holds_2 (+)3518 (-)7 % ------------------ % Total: (+)3538 (-)7 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 3545 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 671 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 43322 % Number of unification failures: 5448 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 21115 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 78358 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 328 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 6 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 31452 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 20960 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 12 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 5 % Number of states in UCFA table: 7719 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 38162 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 112000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.07 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.20 % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 50 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 48770 % ConstructUnitClause() = 34977 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.04 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 1 secs % CPU time: 0.28 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------