↑ Up

E---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PLA030-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:58:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.24s 0.81s
% Output   : Saturation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_31ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_52ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ differ(X2,X1)
    | differ(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_30,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_42,axiom,
    differ(a,table),
    differ_a_table,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_43,axiom,
    differ(a,b),
    differ_a_b,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_44,axiom,
    differ(a,c),
    differ_a_c,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_45,axiom,
    differ(a,d),
    differ_a_d,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_46,axiom,
    differ(b,table),
    differ_b_table,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_47,axiom,
    differ(b,c),
    differ_b_c,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_48,axiom,
    differ(b,d),
    differ_b_d,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_49,axiom,
    differ(c,table),
    differ_c_table,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_50,axiom,
    differ(c,d),
    differ_c_d,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_51,axiom,
    differ(d,table),
    differ_d_table,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ holds(empty,X3)
    | ~ holds(clear(X2),X3)
    | ~ holds(on(X2,X1),X3)
    | holds(clear(X1),do(pickup(X2),X3)) ),
    c_0_31,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ holds(clear(X2),X3)
    | ~ holds(holding(X1),X3)
    | holds(on(X1,X2),do(putdown(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    c_0_32,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( ~ differ(X1,X3)
    | ~ holds(on(X1,X2),X4)
    | holds(on(X1,X2),do(pickup(X3),X4)) ),
    c_0_33,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( ~ holds(clear(X2),X3)
    | ~ holds(holding(X1),X3)
    | holds(clear(X1),do(putdown(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    c_0_34,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    ( ~ holds(clear(X2),X3)
    | ~ holds(holding(X1),X3)
    | holds(empty,do(putdown(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    c_0_35,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ differ(X1,X3)
    | ~ holds(clear(X1),X4)
    | holds(clear(X1),do(putdown(X2,X3),X4)) ),
    c_0_36,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ~ holds(on(X1,X2),X5)
    | holds(on(X1,X2),do(putdown(X3,X4),X5)) ),
    c_0_37,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( ~ differ(X1,table)
    | ~ holds(clear(X1),X2)
    | ~ holds(empty,X2)
    | holds(holding(X1),do(pickup(X1),X2)) ),
    c_0_38,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( ~ differ(X1,X2)
    | ~ holds(clear(X1),X3)
    | holds(clear(X1),do(pickup(X2),X3)) ),
    c_0_39,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( ~ holds(X2,X3)
    | ~ holds(X1,X3)
    | holds(and(X1,X2),X3) ),
    c_0_40,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    differ(table,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    differ(b,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_43]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    differ(c,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_44]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    differ(d,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_45]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    differ(table,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_46]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    differ(c,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_47]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    differ(d,b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_48]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    differ(table,c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_49]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    differ(d,c),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_50]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    differ(table,d),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_51]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_72,axiom,
    holds(on(d,table),s0),
    initial_state4,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_73,axiom,
    holds(on(c,d),s0),
    initial_state3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_74,axiom,
    holds(on(b,table),s0),
    initial_state2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_75,axiom,
    holds(on(a,table),s0),
    initial_state1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_76,axiom,
    holds(clear(table),X1),
    clear_table,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_77,axiom,
    holds(clear(c),s0),
    initial_state7,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_78,axiom,
    holds(clear(b),s0),
    initial_state6,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_79,axiom,
    holds(clear(a),s0),
    initial_state5,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_80,axiom,
    holds(empty,s0),
    initial_state8,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : PLA030-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.67  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.67  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.67  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.67  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.67  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.67  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.67  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.67  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:32:56 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.68  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.68  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.74  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.74  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.81  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4139844 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.24/0.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.81  % Search class: FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.81  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4139848 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.81  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.81  % Search class: FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.81  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.81  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.81  
% 0.24/0.81  % No proof found!
% 0.24/0.81  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.24/0.81  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.81  % Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 0.24/0.81  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.24/0.81  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 0.24/0.81  % Processed clauses                    : 40
% 0.24/0.81  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.24/0.81  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Generated clauses                    : 20
% 0.24/0.81  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.24/0.81  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Paramodulations                      : 20
% 0.24/0.81  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Total rewrite steps                  : 10
% 0.24/0.81  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.81  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.81  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.81  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.81  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.81  % Current number of processed clauses  : 40
% 0.24/0.81  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.24/0.81  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.81  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.24/0.81  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.81  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15
% 0.24/0.81  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.24/0.81  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.81  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 932
% 0.24/0.81  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 53
% 0.24/0.81  
% 0.24/0.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.81  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.81  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.24/0.81  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.81  % Maximum resident set size: 3404 pages
% 0.24/0.81  
% 0.24/0.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.81  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.24/0.81  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.24/0.81  % Total time               : 0.038 s
% 0.24/0.81  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/0.81  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------