↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : PLA032^7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:20:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.77s 2.26s
% Output   : Refutation 4.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PLA032^7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.20  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:22:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.99/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.45/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (261ms). 
% 1.45/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.10/1.46  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.10/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.52/1.64  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 7 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.52/1.68  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 7 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.52/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.52/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.52/1.69  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.77/2.25  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.77/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.77/2.26  % Time passed: 1902ms (effective reasoning time: 1168ms)
% 3.77/2.26  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.77/2.26  % Axioms used in derivation (7): ax1, cumulative_ax, ax2, a1, nonempty_ax, ax3, a2
% 3.77/2.26  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 3.77/2.26  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1902 ms resp. 1168 ms w/o parsing
% 4.07/2.33  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mu_type, type, mu: $tType).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mnot_decl, type, mnot: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mor_decl, type, mor: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mand_decl, type, mand: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mimplies_decl, type, mimplies: (($i > $o) > (($i > $o) > ($i > $o)))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(exists_in_world_decl, type, exists_in_world: (mu > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mforall_ind_decl, type, mforall_ind: ((mu > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mexists_ind_decl, type, mexists_ind: ((mu > ($i > $o)) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mreflexive_decl, type, mreflexive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mtransitive_decl, type, mtransitive: (($i > ($i > $o)) > $o)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mvalid_decl, type, mvalid: (($i > $o) > $o)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(rel_s4_decl, type, rel_s4: ($i > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mbox_s4_decl, type, mbox_s4: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(defused_decl, type, defused: (mu > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(h_decl, type, h: (mu > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(bomb_decl, type, bomb: (mu > ($i > $o))).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mnot_def, definition, mnot = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ~ (A @ B)) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mor_def, definition, mor = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o),C:$i]: ((A @ C) | (B @ C))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mand_def, definition, mand = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:($i > $o)]: (mnot @ (mor @ (mnot @ A) @ (mnot @ B)))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mimplies_def, definition, mimplies = (^ [A:($i > $o)]: (mor @ (mnot @ A))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mforall_ind_def, definition, mforall_ind = (^ [A:(mu > ($i > $o)),B:$i]: ! [C:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ C @ B) => (A @ C @ B))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mexists_ind_def, definition, mexists_ind = (^ [A:(mu > ($i > $o))]: (mnot @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mnot @ (A @ B)))))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mreflexive_def, definition, mreflexive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i]: (A @ B @ B)) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mtransitive_def, definition, mtransitive = (^ [A:($i > ($i > $o))]: ! [B:$i,C:$i,D:$i]: (((A @ B @ C) & (A @ C @ D)) => (A @ B @ D))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mvalid_def, definition, mvalid = ((!) @ $i) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(mbox_s4_def, definition, mbox_s4 = (^ [A:($i > $o),B:$i]: ! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ B @ C) | (A @ C))) ).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(1,conjecture,((mvalid @ (mbox_s4 @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mexists_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mimplies @ (mand @ (bomb @ A) @ (h @ B)) @ (defused @ A))))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(2,negated_conjecture,((~ (mvalid @ (mbox_s4 @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mexists_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mimplies @ (mand @ (bomb @ A) @ (h @ B)) @ (defused @ A)))))))))),inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(10,plain,((~ (! [A:$i,B:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ A @ B) | ! [C:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ C @ B) => (~ (! [D:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ D @ B) => (~ (~ (bomb @ C @ B) | ~ (h @ D @ B) | (defused @ C @ B))))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(7,axiom,((mvalid @ (mbox_s4 @ (mexists_ind @ (bomb))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax1)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(25,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ A @ B) | ~ (! [C:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ C @ B) => (~ (bomb @ C @ B))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(8,axiom,((mvalid @ (mexists_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mbox_s4 @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mimplies @ (mand @ (bomb @ B) @ (h @ A)) @ (mbox_s4 @ (bomb @ B)))))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(29,plain,((! [A:$i]: ~ (! [B:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ B @ A) => (~ (! [C:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ A @ C) | ! [D:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ D @ C) => (~ (bomb @ D @ C) | ~ (h @ B @ C) | ! [E:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ C @ E) | (bomb @ D @ E))))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(5,axiom,((mtransitive @ rel_s4)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(21,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i,C:$i]: (((rel_s4 @ A @ B) & (rel_s4 @ B @ C)) => (rel_s4 @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(6,axiom,((! [A:mu,B:$i,C:$i]: (((exists_in_world @ A @ B) & (rel_s4 @ B @ C)) => (exists_in_world @ A @ C)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cumulative_ax)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(23,plain,((! [A:mu,B:$i,C:$i]: (((exists_in_world @ A @ B) & (rel_s4 @ B @ C)) => (exists_in_world @ A @ C)))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(4,axiom,((mreflexive @ rel_s4)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(19,plain,((! [A:$i]: (rel_s4 @ A @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(9,axiom,((mvalid @ (mbox_s4 @ (mforall_ind @ (^ [A:mu]: (mexists_ind @ (^ [B:mu]: (mbox_s4 @ (mimplies @ (mand @ (bomb @ A) @ (h @ B)) @ (defused @ A)))))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(34,plain,((! [A:$i,B:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ A @ B) | ! [C:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ C @ B) => (~ (! [D:mu]: ((exists_in_world @ D @ B) => (~ (! [E:$i]: (~ (rel_s4 @ B @ E) | ~ (bomb @ C @ E) | ~ (h @ D @ E) | (defused @ C @ E))))))))))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(3,axiom,((! [A:$i]: ? [B:mu]: (exists_in_world @ B @ A))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nonempty_ax)).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(17,plain,((! [A:$i]: ? [B:mu]: (exists_in_world @ B @ A))),inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3])).
% 4.07/2.33  thf(38,plain,(($false)),inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,25,29,21,23,19,34,17])).
% 4.07/2.33  % SZS output end Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.07/2.33  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------