↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : PRO009+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:01:53 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  148 (  59   ~;  56   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn  24   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X100] :
      ( occurrence_of(X100,tptp0)
     => ? [X101,X102] :
          ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp3)
          & root_occ(X101,X100)
          & ( occurrence_of(X102,tptp2)
            | occurrence_of(X102,tptp1) )
          & min_precedes(X101,X102,tptp0)
          & leaf_occ(X102,X100) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(sos_32,axiom,
    ! [X96] :
      ( occurrence_of(X96,tptp0)
     => ? [X97,X98,X99] :
          ( occurrence_of(X97,tptp3)
          & root_occ(X97,X96)
          & occurrence_of(X98,tptp4)
          & next_subocc(X97,X98,tptp0)
          & ( occurrence_of(X99,tptp2)
            | occurrence_of(X99,tptp1) )
          & next_subocc(X98,X99,tptp0)
          & leaf_occ(X99,X96) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_32) ).

fof(sos_04,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( next_subocc(X16,X17,X18)
    <=> ( min_precedes(X16,X17,X18)
        & ~ ? [X19] :
              ( min_precedes(X16,X19,X18)
              & min_precedes(X19,X17,X18) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

fof(sos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( min_precedes(X1,X2,X4)
        & min_precedes(X2,X3,X4) )
     => min_precedes(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X100] :
        ( occurrence_of(X100,tptp0)
       => ? [X101,X102] :
            ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp3)
            & root_occ(X101,X100)
            & ( occurrence_of(X102,tptp2)
              | occurrence_of(X102,tptp1) )
            & min_precedes(X101,X102,tptp0)
            & leaf_occ(X102,X100) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X317] :
      ( ( occurrence_of(esk15_1(X317),tptp3)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) )
      & ( root_occ(esk15_1(X317),X317)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) )
      & ( occurrence_of(esk16_1(X317),tptp4)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) )
      & ( next_subocc(esk15_1(X317),esk16_1(X317),tptp0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) )
      & ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(X317),tptp2)
        | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X317),tptp1)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) )
      & ( next_subocc(esk16_1(X317),esk17_1(X317),tptp0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) )
      & ( leaf_occ(esk17_1(X317),X317)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X317,tptp0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_32])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X322,X323] :
      ( occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0)
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X323,tptp2)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X322,tptp3)
        | ~ root_occ(X322,esk18_0)
        | ~ min_precedes(X322,X323,tptp0)
        | ~ leaf_occ(X323,esk18_0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X323,tptp1)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X322,tptp3)
        | ~ root_occ(X322,esk18_0)
        | ~ min_precedes(X322,X323,tptp0)
        | ~ leaf_occ(X323,esk18_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( leaf_occ(esk17_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X220,X221,X222,X223,X224,X225,X226] :
      ( ( min_precedes(X220,X221,X222)
        | ~ next_subocc(X220,X221,X222) )
      & ( ~ min_precedes(X220,X223,X222)
        | ~ min_precedes(X223,X221,X222)
        | ~ next_subocc(X220,X221,X222) )
      & ( min_precedes(X224,esk1_3(X224,X225,X226),X226)
        | ~ min_precedes(X224,X225,X226)
        | next_subocc(X224,X225,X226) )
      & ( min_precedes(esk1_3(X224,X225,X226),X225,X226)
        | ~ min_precedes(X224,X225,X226)
        | next_subocc(X224,X225,X226) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_04])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( next_subocc(esk16_1(X1),esk17_1(X1),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp3)
    | ~ root_occ(X2,esk18_0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X2,X1,tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    leaf_occ(esk17_1(esk18_0),esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(X1),tptp2)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X1),tptp1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp3)
    | ~ root_occ(X2,esk18_0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X2,X1,tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X205,X206,X207,X208] :
      ( ~ min_precedes(X205,X206,X208)
      | ~ min_precedes(X206,X207,X208)
      | min_precedes(X205,X207,X208) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( min_precedes(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ next_subocc(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    next_subocc(esk16_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( next_subocc(esk15_1(X1),esk16_1(X1),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( root_occ(esk15_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk15_1(X1),tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( min_precedes(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X2,X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    min_precedes(esk16_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    next_subocc(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    root_occ(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk18_0),tptp3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : PRO009+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 01:31:06 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.73  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------