↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PRO009+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:59:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.73s 1.08s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  148 (  59   ~;  56   |;  28   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn  24   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X100] :
      ( occurrence_of(X100,tptp0)
     => ? [X101,X102] :
          ( leaf_occ(X102,X100)
          & min_precedes(X101,X102,tptp0)
          & ( occurrence_of(X102,tptp1)
            | occurrence_of(X102,tptp2) )
          & root_occ(X101,X100)
          & occurrence_of(X101,tptp3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(sos_32,axiom,
    ! [X96] :
      ( occurrence_of(X96,tptp0)
     => ? [X97,X98,X99] :
          ( leaf_occ(X99,X96)
          & next_subocc(X98,X99,tptp0)
          & ( occurrence_of(X99,tptp1)
            | occurrence_of(X99,tptp2) )
          & next_subocc(X97,X98,tptp0)
          & occurrence_of(X98,tptp4)
          & root_occ(X97,X96)
          & occurrence_of(X97,tptp3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_32) ).

fof(sos_04,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( next_subocc(X16,X17,X18)
    <=> ( ~ ? [X19] :
              ( min_precedes(X19,X17,X18)
              & min_precedes(X16,X19,X18) )
        & min_precedes(X16,X17,X18) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

fof(sos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( min_precedes(X2,X3,X4)
        & min_precedes(X1,X2,X4) )
     => min_precedes(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X100] :
        ( occurrence_of(X100,tptp0)
       => ? [X101,X102] :
            ( leaf_occ(X102,X100)
            & min_precedes(X101,X102,tptp0)
            & ( occurrence_of(X102,tptp1)
              | occurrence_of(X102,tptp2) )
            & root_occ(X101,X100)
            & occurrence_of(X101,tptp3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X215] :
      ( ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | leaf_occ(esk17_1(X215),X215) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | next_subocc(esk16_1(X215),esk17_1(X215),tptp0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X215),tptp1)
        | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X215),tptp2) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | next_subocc(esk15_1(X215),esk16_1(X215),tptp0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | occurrence_of(esk16_1(X215),tptp4) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | root_occ(esk15_1(X215),X215) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X215,tptp0)
        | occurrence_of(esk15_1(X215),tptp3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_32])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X220,X221] :
      ( ( ~ leaf_occ(X221,esk18_0)
        | ~ min_precedes(X220,X221,tptp0)
        | ~ root_occ(X220,esk18_0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X220,tptp3)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X221,tptp1) )
      & ( ~ leaf_occ(X221,esk18_0)
        | ~ min_precedes(X220,X221,tptp0)
        | ~ root_occ(X220,esk18_0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X220,tptp3)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X221,tptp2) )
      & occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | leaf_occ(esk17_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X118,X119,X120,X121,X122,X123,X124] :
      ( ( next_subocc(X122,X123,X124)
        | ~ min_precedes(X122,X123,X124)
        | min_precedes(esk1_3(X122,X123,X124),X123,X124) )
      & ( next_subocc(X122,X123,X124)
        | ~ min_precedes(X122,X123,X124)
        | min_precedes(X122,esk1_3(X122,X123,X124),X124) )
      & ( ~ next_subocc(X118,X119,X120)
        | ~ min_precedes(X121,X119,X120)
        | ~ min_precedes(X118,X121,X120) )
      & ( ~ next_subocc(X118,X119,X120)
        | min_precedes(X118,X119,X120) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_04])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | next_subocc(esk16_1(X1),esk17_1(X1),tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X2,X1,tptp0)
    | ~ root_occ(X2,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    leaf_occ(esk17_1(esk18_0),esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X1),tptp1)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X1),tptp2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X2,X1,tptp0)
    | ~ root_occ(X2,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X103,X104,X105,X106] :
      ( min_precedes(X103,X105,X106)
      | ~ min_precedes(X104,X105,X106)
      | ~ min_precedes(X103,X104,X106) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ next_subocc(X1,X2,X3)
    | min_precedes(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    next_subocc(esk16_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | next_subocc(esk15_1(X1),esk16_1(X1),tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1)
    | ~ root_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2)
    | ~ root_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | root_occ(esk15_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | occurrence_of(esk15_1(X1),tptp3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X2,X4,X3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,X2,X3)
    | min_precedes(X1,X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    min_precedes(esk16_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    next_subocc(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ root_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    root_occ(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk18_0),tptp3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0)
    | min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : PRO009+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:42:20 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.73/1.08  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.73/1.08  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.73/1.08  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 3053676 completed with status 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 1.73/1.08  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.73/1.08  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.73/1.08  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.73/1.08  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 1.73/1.08  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with 136s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with pid 3053682 completed with status 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 1.73/1.08  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.73/1.08  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.73/1.08  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.73/1.08  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 1.73/1.08  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with 136s (1) cores
% 1.73/1.08  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 1.73/1.08  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.73/1.08  
% 1.73/1.08  % Proof found!
% 1.73/1.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.73/1.08  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.73/1.08  % Parsed axioms                        : 46
% 1.73/1.08  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Initial clauses                      : 85
% 1.73/1.08  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 85
% 1.73/1.08  % Processed clauses                    : 321
% 1.73/1.08  % ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 1.73/1.08  % ...subsumed                          : 11
% 1.73/1.08  % ...remaining for further processing  : 300
% 1.73/1.08  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 1.73/1.08  % Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 1.73/1.08  % Generated clauses                    : 319
% 1.73/1.08  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 273
% 1.73/1.08  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 1.73/1.08  % Paramodulations                      : 318
% 1.73/1.08  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Total rewrite steps                  : 117
% 1.73/1.08  % ...of those cached                   : 77
% 1.73/1.08  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.73/1.08  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.73/1.08  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.73/1.08  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.73/1.08  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.73/1.08  % Current number of processed clauses  : 195
% 1.73/1.08  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 64
% 1.73/1.08  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.73/1.08  %    Negative unit clauses             : 34
% 1.73/1.08  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 97
% 1.73/1.08  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 98
% 1.73/1.08  % ...number of literals in the above   : 153
% 1.73/1.08  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Current number of archived clauses   : 105
% 1.73/1.08  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3590
% 1.73/1.08  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2592
% 1.73/1.08  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 1.73/1.08  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 728
% 1.73/1.08  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 1.73/1.08  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 1.73/1.08  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.73/1.08  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 10079
% 1.73/1.08  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1267
% 1.73/1.08  
% 1.73/1.08  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.73/1.08  % User time                : 0.032 s
% 1.73/1.08  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 1.73/1.08  % Total time               : 0.037 s
% 1.73/1.08  % Maximum resident set size: 3992 pages
% 1.73/1.08  
% 1.73/1.08  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.73/1.08  % User time                : 0.081 s
% 1.73/1.08  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 1.73/1.08  % Total time               : 0.092 s
% 1.73/1.08  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 1.73/1.08  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------