↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : PRO010+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:43:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.36s 2.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (   7 unt;   6 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   61 (   7 equ;  28 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_89,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk16_0,tptp0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_89) ).

cnf(i_0_86,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk18_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_86) ).

cnf(i_0_61,plain,
    ( leaf_occ(esk15_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_61) ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,esk9_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ leaf_occ(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ leaf(X1,X2)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( leaf(X1,esk9_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk17_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_82) ).

cnf(i_0_79,plain,
    tptp2 != tptp1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8tsdbsgv/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk16_0,tptp0),
    i_0_89 ).

cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk18_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    i_0_86 ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( leaf_occ(esk15_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    i_0_61 ).

cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = tptp0
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk16_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_100]) ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,esk9_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ leaf_occ(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( ~ leaf(X1,X2)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,X3,X2) ),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( min_precedes(X1,esk18_2(X1,esk15_1(esk16_0)),tptp0)
    | occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_102]),c_0_100])]) ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( leaf(X1,esk9_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( esk9_2(X1,esk16_0) = tptp0
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_104]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk17_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    i_0_82 ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp1)
    | ~ leaf(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( leaf(X1,tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    ( min_precedes(X1,esk17_2(X1,esk15_1(esk16_0)),tptp0)
    | occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_102]),c_0_100])]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp1)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp2)
    | ~ leaf(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_112]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_102]),c_0_100])]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp2)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk16_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( X1 = tptp1
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_115]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk16_0),tptp2),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_102]),c_0_100])]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    tptp2 != tptp1,
    i_0_79 ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_118]),c_0_119]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : PRO010+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 01:41:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.36/2.44  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.36/2.44  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.36/2.44  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.36/2.44  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C41_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S2U
% 7.36/2.44  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPExceptRRHorn.
% 7.36/2.44  #
% 7.36/2.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 7.36/2.44  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.36/2.44  
% 7.36/2.44  # Proof found!
% 7.36/2.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.36/2.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.36/2.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.36/2.44  
% 7.36/2.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.36/2.44  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 7.36/2.44  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 7.36/2.44  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 7.36/2.44  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.36/2.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------