↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : PRO011+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:43:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.30s 2.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (   7 unt;   4 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   55 (   5 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_43,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X3,X1)
    | ~ min_precedes(X3,X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_86,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk19_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_86) ).

cnf(i_0_64,plain,
    ( leaf_occ(esk17_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_99,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_99) ).

cnf(i_0_95,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk20_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_95) ).

cnf(i_0_44,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_82,plain,
    tptp2 != tptp1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-112_1zxf/lgb.p',i_0_82) ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X3,X1)
    | ~ min_precedes(X3,X4,X2) ),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk19_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    i_0_86 ).

cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp2)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X2,X3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( leaf_occ(esk17_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0),
    i_0_99 ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
    | min_precedes(X2,esk20_2(X2,X1),tptp0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0) ),
    i_0_95 ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,X2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),c_0_111])]) ).

cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(X1,tptp1)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,esk18_0)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X2,X3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_112]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1)
    | ~ leaf_occ(X1,X2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_110]),c_0_111])]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_118,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( X1 = tptp2
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_118]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_111]) ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    tptp2 != tptp1,
    i_0_82 ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]),c_0_122]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : PRO011+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 02:09:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.30/2.50  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.30/2.50  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.30/2.50  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.30/2.50  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C36_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 8.30/2.50  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.30/2.50  #
% 8.30/2.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 8.30/2.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.30/2.50  
% 8.30/2.50  # Proof found!
% 8.30/2.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.30/2.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.30/2.50  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.30/2.50  
% 8.30/2.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.30/2.50  # User time                : 0.028 s
% 8.30/2.50  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 8.30/2.50  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 8.30/2.50  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.30/2.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------