↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : PRO012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:53:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.88s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   48 (  26 unt;   3 nHn;  48 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   85 (   4 equ;  38 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,Y)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X,Z)
    | Y = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_02) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,Y)
    | arboreal(X)
    | ~ atomic(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_07) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ legal(X)
    | arboreal(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_08) ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | root('SKOLEMAAAV5'(Z,Y),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_13) ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV5'(Z,Y),Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_13) ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ root(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_14) ).

cnf(27,axiom,
    ( ~ root(X,Y)
    | legal(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_16) ).

cnf(46,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV10'(Z,X,Y),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_25) ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | subactivity_occurrence(X,'SKOLEMAAAV10'(Z,X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_25) ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | subactivity_occurrence(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV10'(Z,X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_25) ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,Y)
    | ~ arboreal(Z)
    | ~ arboreal(U)
    | ~ subactivity_occurrence(Z,X)
    | ~ subactivity_occurrence(U,X)
    | min_precedes(Z,U,Y)
    | min_precedes(U,Z,Y)
    | Z = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_28) ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ occurrence_of(U,Z)
    | ~ subactivity_occurrence(Y,U)
    | subactivity_occurrence(X,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_29) ).

cnf(59,axiom,
    ( ~ root_occ(X,Y)
    | occurrence_of(Y,'SKOLEMAAAV14'(Y,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_33) ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( ~ root_occ(X,Y)
    | root(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14'(Y,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_33) ).

cnf(67,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp0)
    | occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV16'(X),tptp3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_35) ).

cnf(68,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp0)
    | root_occ('SKOLEMAAAV16'(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_35) ).

cnf(70,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp0)
    | min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV16'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV17'(X),tptp0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_35) ).

cnf(71,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp0)
    | occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV18'(X),tptp2)
    | occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV18'(X),tptp1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_35) ).

cnf(72,axiom,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp0)
    | min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV17'(X),'SKOLEMAAAV18'(X),tptp0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_35) ).

cnf(79,axiom,
    atomic(tptp3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_41) ).

cnf(86,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV19',tptp0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(87,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp3)
    | ~ root_occ(X,'SKOLEMAAAV19')
    | ~ occurrence_of(Y,tptp2)
    | ~ min_precedes(X,Y,tptp0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(88,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X,tptp3)
    | ~ root_occ(X,'SKOLEMAAAV19')
    | ~ occurrence_of(Y,tptp1)
    | ~ min_precedes(X,Y,tptp0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp3),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[67,86]) ).

cnf(97,plain,
    root_occ('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV19'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[68,86]) ).

cnf(99,plain,
    min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[70,86]) ).

cnf(100,plain,
    min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[72,86]) ).

cnf(103,plain,
    ( occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp2)
    | occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp1) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[71,86]) ).

cnf(119,plain,
    arboreal('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,96,79]) ).

cnf(126,plain,
    occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV19','SKOLEMAAAV14'('SKOLEMAAAV19','SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[59,97]) ).

cnf(127,plain,
    root('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV14'('SKOLEMAAAV19','SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[61,97]) ).

cnf(187,plain,
    root('SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19')),tptp0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[23,100]) ).

cnf(188,plain,
    occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV10'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19')),tptp0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[46,100]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19')),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp0),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[24,100]) ).

cnf(192,plain,
    subactivity_occurrence('SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV10'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[48,100]) ).

cnf(193,plain,
    subactivity_occurrence('SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV10'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[47,100]) ).

cnf(239,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV14'('SKOLEMAAAV19','SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19')) = tptp0,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,126,86]) ).

cnf(240,plain,
    root('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp0),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[127,239,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(241,plain,
    ~ min_precedes(X,'SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp0),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[25,240]) ).

cnf(259,plain,
    legal('SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[27,187]) ).

cnf(260,plain,
    ~ min_precedes(X,'SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19')),tptp0),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[25,187]) ).

cnf(296,plain,
    arboreal('SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,259]) ).

cnf(507,plain,
    subactivity_occurrence('SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19')),'SKOLEMAAAV10'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[54,192,189,188]) ).

cnf(508,plain,
    subactivity_occurrence('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV10'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV17'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[54,193,99,188]) ).

cnf(991,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV5'(tptp0,'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19')) = 'SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[53,507,188,296,119,508,241,260]) ).

cnf(992,plain,
    min_precedes('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),'SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp0),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[189,991,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1031,plain,
    occurrence_of('SKOLEMAAAV18'('SKOLEMAAAV19'),tptp1),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[87,992,96,97,103]) ).

cnf(1032,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[88,992,96,97]),1031]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : PRO012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 01:00:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T01:00:44
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-06-13T01:00:44
% 0.71/0.88  
% 0.71/0.88  
% 0.71/0.88  #||
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.71/0.88  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.89  ||#
% 0.71/0.89  
% 0.71/0.89  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.71/0.89  ;      2459 formulas have been input or derived (from 450 formulas).
% 0.71/0.89  ;      1032 (42%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.71/0.89  ;          260 (25%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.71/0.89  ;          772 (75%) are still being kept.
% 0.71/0.89  ; 
% 0.71/0.89  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.011   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.004   1%   Assert                       (49 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.078  19%   Process new row              (1,957 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.223  54%   Resolution                   (898 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.003   1%   Paramodulation               (449 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (8 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.002   0%   Condensing                   (277 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.019   5%   Forward subsumption          (277 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.005   1%   Backward subsumption         (250 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.002   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (72 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.015   4%   Forward simplification       (1,902 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.015   4%   Backward simplification      (1,032 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (227 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.036   9%   Other
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.414        Total
% 0.71/0.89  ;     0.418        Real time
% 0.71/0.89  ; 
% 0.71/0.89  ; Term-hash-array has 1,470 terms in all.
% 0.71/0.89  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 196 entries (223 at peak, 250 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.71/0.89  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,604 nodes (2,020 at peak, 2,242 added, 638 deleted).
% 0.71/0.89  ;  Retrieved 74 possibly forward subsuming rows in 277 calls.
% 0.71/0.89  ;  Retrieved 17 possibly backward subsumed rows in 250 calls.
% 0.71/0.89  ; Path-index has 1,135 entries (1,270 at peak, 1,486 added, 351 deleted).
% 0.71/0.89  ; Path-index has 4,062 nodes (4,219 at peak, 4,383 added, 321 deleted).
% 0.71/0.89  ; Trie-index has 1,135 entries (1,270 at peak, 1,486 added, 351 deleted).
% 0.71/0.89  ; Trie-index has 5,423 nodes (6,309 at peak, 7,177 added, 1,754 deleted).
% 0.71/0.89  ; Retrieved 853 generalization terms in 2,460 calls.
% 0.71/0.89  ; Retrieved 792 instance terms in 781 calls.
% 0.71/0.89  ; Retrieved 166,216 unifiable terms in 35,849 calls.
% 0.71/0.89  ; 
% 0.71/0.89  ; The agenda of rows to process has 37 entries:
% 0.71/0.89  ;     1 with value 9               1 with value 13               1 with value 17
% 0.71/0.89  ;     1 with value 10             10 with value 14               1 with value 20
% 0.71/0.89  ;     7 with value 11             10 with value 15               2 with value 24
% 0.71/0.89  ;     1 with value 12              2 with value 16
% 0.71/0.89  ; The agenda of rows to give has 404 entries:
% 0.71/0.89  ;     1 with value (4 6)           9 with value (4 26)           5 with value (4 39)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     1 with value (4 9)           3 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 40)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     5 with value (4 14)         11 with value (4 28)           6 with value (4 41)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     5 with value (4 15)          7 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 42)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     2 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 30)           6 with value (4 43)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    61 with value (4 17)          3 with value (4 31)           7 with value (4 44)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    37 with value (4 18)          5 with value (4 32)           4 with value (4 45)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    39 with value (4 19)          3 with value (4 33)           4 with value (4 47)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    23 with value (4 20)          2 with value (4 34)           2 with value (4 48)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    20 with value (4 21)          7 with value (4 35)           6 with value (4 50)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    27 with value (4 22)          7 with value (4 36)           8 with value (4 51)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    22 with value (4 23)          5 with value (4 37)           6 with value (4 52)
% 0.71/0.89  ;    26 with value (4 24)          1 with value (4 38)           4 with value (4 56)
% 0.71/0.89  ;     6 with value (4 25)
% 0.71/0.89  Evaluation took:
% 0.71/0.89    0.419 seconds of real time
% 0.71/0.89    0.391722 seconds of user run time
% 0.71/0.89    0.027061 seconds of system run time
% 0.71/0.89    [Run times include 0.017 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.71/0.89    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.71/0.89    0 page faults and
% 0.71/0.89    34,404,560 bytes consed.
% 0.71/0.89  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.71/0.89  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-13T01:00:44
% 0.71/0.89  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.71/0.89  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------