↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PRO012+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:59:33 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  40   ~;  40   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  16   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X101] :
      ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp0)
     => ? [X102,X103] :
          ( min_precedes(X102,X103,tptp0)
          & ( occurrence_of(X103,tptp1)
            | occurrence_of(X103,tptp2) )
          & root_occ(X102,X101)
          & occurrence_of(X102,tptp3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

fof(sos_32,axiom,
    ! [X96] :
      ( occurrence_of(X96,tptp0)
     => ? [X97,X98,X99] :
          ( ! [X100] :
              ( min_precedes(X97,X100,tptp0)
             => ( X100 = X99
                | X100 = X98 ) )
          & min_precedes(X98,X99,tptp0)
          & ( occurrence_of(X99,tptp1)
            | occurrence_of(X99,tptp2) )
          & min_precedes(X97,X98,tptp0)
          & occurrence_of(X98,tptp4)
          & root_occ(X97,X96)
          & occurrence_of(X97,tptp3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_32) ).

fof(sos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( min_precedes(X2,X3,X4)
        & min_precedes(X1,X2,X4) )
     => min_precedes(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X101] :
        ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp0)
       => ? [X102,X103] :
            ( min_precedes(X102,X103,tptp0)
            & ( occurrence_of(X103,tptp1)
              | occurrence_of(X103,tptp2) )
            & root_occ(X102,X101)
            & occurrence_of(X102,tptp3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X216,X220] :
      ( ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | X220 = esk17_1(X216)
        | X220 = esk16_1(X216)
        | ~ min_precedes(esk15_1(X216),X220,tptp0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | min_precedes(esk16_1(X216),esk17_1(X216),tptp0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X216),tptp1)
        | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X216),tptp2) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | min_precedes(esk15_1(X216),esk16_1(X216),tptp0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | occurrence_of(esk16_1(X216),tptp4) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | root_occ(esk15_1(X216),X216) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X216,tptp0)
        | occurrence_of(esk15_1(X216),tptp3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_32])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X222,X223] :
      ( ( ~ min_precedes(X222,X223,tptp0)
        | ~ root_occ(X222,esk18_0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X222,tptp3)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X223,tptp1) )
      & ( ~ min_precedes(X222,X223,tptp0)
        | ~ root_occ(X222,esk18_0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X222,tptp3)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X223,tptp2) )
      & occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | root_occ(esk15_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk18_0,tptp0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | occurrence_of(esk15_1(X1),tptp3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X104,X105,X106,X107] :
      ( min_precedes(X104,X106,X107)
      | ~ min_precedes(X105,X106,X107)
      | ~ min_precedes(X104,X105,X107) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | min_precedes(esk16_1(X1),esk17_1(X1),tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X2,X1,tptp0)
    | ~ root_occ(X2,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    root_occ(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk15_1(esk18_0),tptp3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X1),tptp1)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(X1),tptp2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X2,X1,tptp0)
    | ~ root_occ(X2,esk18_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X2,X4,X3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,X2,X3)
    | min_precedes(X1,X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    min_precedes(esk16_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0)
    | min_precedes(esk15_1(X1),esk16_1(X1),tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),X1,tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp2)
    | occurrence_of(esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),X1,tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0)
    | min_precedes(X1,esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk16_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ min_precedes(esk15_1(esk18_0),esk17_1(esk18_0),tptp0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PRO012+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:42:28 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 764874 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with pid 764880 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 46
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 85
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 85
% 0.14/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 277
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 0.14/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 9
% 0.14/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 261
% 0.14/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.14/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 208
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 187
% 0.14/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 208
% 0.14/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 76
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 48
% 0.14/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 162
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 48
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 20
% 0.14/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 94
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 64
% 0.14/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 92
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 99
% 0.14/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3877
% 0.14/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3006
% 0.14/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.14/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 417
% 0.14/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8713
% 0.14/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1277
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3992 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.074 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.092 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------