↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : PRO012+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 17:45:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   2 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  100 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  131 (  54   ~;  51   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  16   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(goals,conjecture,
    ! [X101] :
      ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp0)
     => ? [X102,X103] :
          ( occurrence_of(X102,tptp3)
          & root_occ(X102,X101)
          & ( occurrence_of(X103,tptp2)
            | occurrence_of(X103,tptp1) )
          & min_precedes(X102,X103,tptp0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',goals) ).

fof(sos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( min_precedes(X1,X2,X4)
        & min_precedes(X2,X3,X4) )
     => min_precedes(X1,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos) ).

fof(sos_32,axiom,
    ! [X96] :
      ( occurrence_of(X96,tptp0)
     => ? [X97,X98,X99] :
          ( occurrence_of(X97,tptp3)
          & root_occ(X97,X96)
          & occurrence_of(X98,tptp4)
          & min_precedes(X97,X98,tptp0)
          & ( occurrence_of(X99,tptp2)
            | occurrence_of(X99,tptp1) )
          & min_precedes(X98,X99,tptp0)
          & ! [X100] :
              ( min_precedes(X97,X100,tptp0)
             => ( X100 = X98
                | X100 = X99 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sos_32) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X101] :
        ( occurrence_of(X101,tptp0)
       => ? [X102,X103] :
            ( occurrence_of(X102,tptp3)
            & root_occ(X102,X101)
            & ( occurrence_of(X103,tptp2)
              | occurrence_of(X103,tptp1) )
            & min_precedes(X102,X103,tptp0) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ~ min_precedes(X5,X6,X8)
      | ~ min_precedes(X6,X7,X8)
      | min_precedes(X5,X7,X8) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X101,X105] :
      ( ( occurrence_of(esk2_1(X101),tptp3)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) )
      & ( root_occ(esk2_1(X101),X101)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) )
      & ( occurrence_of(esk3_1(X101),tptp4)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) )
      & ( min_precedes(esk2_1(X101),esk3_1(X101),tptp0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) )
      & ( occurrence_of(esk4_1(X101),tptp2)
        | occurrence_of(esk4_1(X101),tptp1)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) )
      & ( min_precedes(esk3_1(X101),esk4_1(X101),tptp0)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) )
      & ( ~ min_precedes(esk2_1(X101),X105,tptp0)
        | X105 = esk3_1(X101)
        | X105 = esk4_1(X101)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X101,tptp0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_32])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X105,X106] :
      ( occurrence_of(esk1_0,tptp0)
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X106,tptp2)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X105,tptp3)
        | ~ root_occ(X105,esk1_0)
        | ~ min_precedes(X105,X106,tptp0) )
      & ( ~ occurrence_of(X106,tptp1)
        | ~ occurrence_of(X105,tptp3)
        | ~ root_occ(X105,esk1_0)
        | ~ min_precedes(X105,X106,tptp0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( min_precedes(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( min_precedes(esk3_1(X1),esk4_1(X1),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,X2,tptp0)
    | ~ root_occ(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( min_precedes(X1,esk4_1(X2),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk3_1(X2),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ min_precedes(X1,X2,tptp0)
    | ~ root_occ(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk4_1(X2),tptp1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk3_1(X2),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( min_precedes(esk2_1(X1),esk3_1(X1),tptp0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk2_1(X1),tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk4_1(X2),tptp2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp3)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X2,tptp0)
    | ~ min_precedes(X1,esk3_1(X2),tptp0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(esk2_1(X1),esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk4_1(X1),tptp1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( occurrence_of(esk4_1(X1),tptp1)
    | occurrence_of(esk4_1(X1),tptp2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(esk2_1(X1),esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(esk4_1(X1),tptp2)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ root_occ(esk2_1(X1),esk1_0)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( root_occ(esk2_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ occurrence_of(X1,tptp0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    occurrence_of(esk1_0,tptp0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : PRO012+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 03:20:48 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/1.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 0.27/1.44  
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object total steps             : 23
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 3
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.27/1.44  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 0.27/1.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 46
% 0.27/1.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 16
% 0.27/1.44  # Initial clauses                      : 54
% 0.27/1.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 54
% 0.27/1.44  # Processed clauses                    : 832
% 0.27/1.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.27/1.44  # ...subsumed                          : 514
% 0.27/1.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 316
% 0.27/1.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 41
% 0.27/1.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 0.27/1.44  # Generated clauses                    : 1521
% 0.27/1.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 1312
% 0.27/1.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 498
% 0.27/1.44  # Paramodulations                      : 1521
% 0.27/1.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 257
% 0.27/1.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.27/1.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 16
% 0.27/1.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 226
% 0.27/1.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 401
% 0.27/1.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1504
% 0.27/1.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 59
% 0.27/1.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44703
% 0.27/1.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31094
% 0.27/1.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 957
% 0.27/1.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 360
% 0.27/1.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.27/1.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.27/1.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/1.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 21239
% 0.27/1.44  
% 0.27/1.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.44  # User time                : 0.082 s
% 0.27/1.44  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.27/1.44  # Total time               : 0.088 s
% 0.27/1.44  # Maximum resident set size: 3896 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------