↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : PRO019^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:20:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 34.82s 9.74s
% Output   : Refutation 34.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   72 (  11   ~;   7   |;   1   &;  51   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0   ^;  10   !;   0   ?;  10   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(proces10484146Action_decl,type,
    proces10484146Action: 
      !>[TA: $tType] : ( ( proces634752977rocess @ TA ) > $o ) ).

thf(proces401113213Choice_decl,type,
    proces401113213Choice: 
      !>[TA: $tType] : ( ( proces634752977rocess @ TA ) > $o ) ).

thf(p_decl,type,
    p: proces634752977rocess @ a ).

thf(127,axiom,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: proces634752977rocess @ TA] :
      ( ~ ( proces10484146Action @ TA @ A )
     => ( proces401113213Choice @ TA @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2_process_Oexhaust__disc) ).

thf(657,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: proces634752977rocess @ TA] :
      ( ~ ( proces10484146Action @ TA @ A )
     => ( proces401113213Choice @ TA @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[127]) ).

thf(658,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: proces634752977rocess @ TA] :
      ( ( proces10484146Action @ TA @ A )
      | ( proces401113213Choice @ TA @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[657]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( proces10484146Action @ a @ p )
    | ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( proces10484146Action @ a @ p )
      | ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(142,plain,
    ~ ( ( proces10484146Action @ a @ p )
      | ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(143,plain,
    ( ~ ( proces10484146Action @ a @ p )
    & ~ ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[142]) ).

thf(145,plain,
    ~ ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[143]) ).

thf(817,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: proces634752977rocess @ TA] :
      ( ( proces10484146Action @ TA @ A )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( proces401113213Choice @ TA @ A )
       != ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[658,145]) ).

thf(818,plain,
    ! [TA: $tType,A: proces634752977rocess @ TA] :
      ( ( proces10484146Action @ TA @ A )
      | ( ( proces401113213Choice @ TA @ A )
       != ( proces401113213Choice @ a @ p ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[817]) ).

thf(819,plain,
    proces10484146Action @ a @ p,
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[818:[bind(A,$thf( p )),bind_type(TA,$thf( a ))]]) ).

thf(144,plain,
    ~ ( proces10484146Action @ a @ p ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[143]) ).

thf(821,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[819,144]) ).

thf(822,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[821]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PRO019^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.19  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:20:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.20  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.20  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 2.00/1.16  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (372ms). 
% 2.00/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.09/1.55  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.09/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.53/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 283 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.74/1.83  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 139 axioms (removed 144 axioms). 
% 4.79/2.14  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 4.79/2.16  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 4.79/2.17  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 34.82/9.74  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 34.82/9.74  % Time passed: 9401ms (effective reasoning time: 8561ms)
% 34.82/9.74  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 34.82/9.74  % Axioms used in derivation (1): fact_2_process_Oexhaust__disc
% 34.82/9.74  % No. of inferences in proof: 14
% 34.82/9.74  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 9401 ms resp. 8561 ms w/o parsing
% 34.82/9.77  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 34.82/9.77  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------