↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 13:41:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem    : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.08/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime   : Tue Jun 18 10:13:38 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.46  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.70  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.70  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.58/0.70  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.70  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.58/0.70  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.58/0.70  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.58/0.70  
% 0.58/0.70  % Result      :Theorem 0.220000s
% 0.58/0.70  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.220000s
% 0.58/0.70  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.71  % File     : PUZ001+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.58/0.71  % Domain   : Puzzles
% 0.58/0.71  % Problem  : Dreadbury Mansion
% 0.58/0.71  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.58/0.71  %            Theorem formulation : Reduced > Complete.
% 0.58/0.71  % English  : Someone who lives in Dreadbury Mansion killed Aunt Agatha.
% 0.58/0.71  %            Agatha, the butler, and Charles live in Dreadbury Mansion,
% 0.58/0.71  %            and are the only people who live therein. A killer always
% 0.58/0.71  %            hates his victim, and is never richer than his victim.
% 0.58/0.71  %            Charles hates no one that Aunt Agatha hates. Agatha hates
% 0.58/0.71  %            everyone except the butler. The butler hates everyone not
% 0.58/0.71  %            richer than Aunt Agatha. The butler hates everyone Aunt
% 0.58/0.71  %            Agatha hates. No one hates everyone. Agatha is not the
% 0.58/0.71  %            butler. Therefore : Agatha killed herself.
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  % Refs     : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 0.58/0.71  %          : [Hah94] Haehnle (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.58/0.71  % Source   : [Hah94]
% 0.58/0.71  % Names    : Pelletier 55 [Pel86]
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.58/0.71  % Rating   : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.06 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.26 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.08 v4.1.0, 0.13 v4.0.0, 0.12 v3.7.0, 0.14 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.11 v3.2.0, 0.22 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.33 v2.4.0, 0.33 v2.2.1, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 0.58/0.71  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 def)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Number of atoms       :   24 (   5 equ)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Number of connectives :   16 (   6   ~;   2   |;   1   &)
% 0.58/0.71  %                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.58/0.71  %            Number of variables   :   12 (  10   !;   2   ?)
% 0.58/0.71  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  % Comments : Modified by Geoff Sutcliffe.
% 0.58/0.71  %          : Also known as "Who killed Aunt Agatha"
% 0.58/0.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.71  %----Problem axioms
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_1,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ? [X] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( lives(X)
% 0.58/0.71        & killed(X,agatha) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_2_1,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      lives(agatha) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_2_2,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      lives(butler) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_2_3,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      lives(charles) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_3,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( lives(X)
% 0.58/0.71       => ( X = agatha
% 0.58/0.71          | X = butler
% 0.58/0.71          | X = charles ) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_4,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( killed(X,Y)
% 0.58/0.71       => hates(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_5,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( killed(X,Y)
% 0.58/0.71       => ~ richer(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_6,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( hates(agatha,X)
% 0.58/0.71       => ~ hates(charles,X) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_7,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( X != butler
% 0.58/0.71       => hates(agatha,X) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_8,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( ~ richer(X,agatha)
% 0.58/0.71       => hates(butler,X) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_9,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.58/0.71        ( hates(agatha,X)
% 0.58/0.71       => hates(butler,X) ) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_10,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      ! [X] :
% 0.58/0.71      ? [Y] : ~ hates(X,Y) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55_11,axiom,
% 0.58/0.71      agatha != butler ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  fof(pel55,conjecture,
% 0.58/0.71      killed(agatha,agatha) ).
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.71  % Proof found
% 0.58/0.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.71  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.58/0.71  %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.58/0.71  %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 0.58/0.71  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.58/0.71  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.58/0.71  %SharedTerms:11
% 0.58/0.71  %goalClause: 18
% 0.58/0.71  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.58/0.71  [12]P1(a1)
% 0.58/0.71  [13]P1(a2)
% 0.58/0.71  [14]P1(a3)
% 0.58/0.71  [15]P1(a4)
% 0.58/0.71  [16]P2(a4,a1)
% 0.58/0.71  [17]~E(a1,a2)
% 0.58/0.71  [18]~P2(a1,a1)
% 0.58/0.71  [19]~P3(x191,f5(x191))
% 0.58/0.71  [21]P3(a1,x211)+E(x211,a2)
% 0.58/0.71  [22]P3(a2,x221)+P4(x221,a1)
% 0.58/0.71  [23]~P3(a1,x231)+P3(a2,x231)
% 0.58/0.71  [25]~P3(a3,x251)+~P3(a1,x251)
% 0.58/0.71  [24]~P2(x241,x242)+P3(x241,x242)
% 0.58/0.71  [26]~P4(x261,x262)+~P2(x261,x262)
% 0.58/0.71  [20]~P1(x201)+E(x201,a2)+E(x201,a3)+E(x201,a1)
% 0.58/0.71  %EqnAxiom
% 0.58/0.71  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.58/0.71  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.58/0.71  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.58/0.71  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.58/0.71  [5]~P1(x51)+P1(x52)+~E(x51,x52)
% 0.58/0.71  [6]P4(x62,x63)+~E(x61,x62)+~P4(x61,x63)
% 0.58/0.71  [7]P4(x73,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P4(x73,x71)
% 0.58/0.71  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.58/0.71  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.58/0.71  [10]P3(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P3(x101,x103)
% 0.58/0.71  [11]P3(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x113,x111)
% 0.58/0.71  
% 0.58/0.71  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(33,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (P3(a2,a4)),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,16,17,24,21,26,22])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(38,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (~P3(a3,a1)),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,16,17,24,21,26,22,23,25])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(40,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (~E(a4,a1)),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19,16,17,24,21,26,22,23,25,8])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(55,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (~P2(a3,a1)),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[38,24])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (~E(a4,f5(a2))),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,38,33,24,11])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(90,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (~E(a4,a3)),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[55,16,8])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(165,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     (E(f5(a2),a2)),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,23,21])).
% 0.58/0.71  cnf(169,plain,
% 0.58/0.71     ($false),
% 0.58/0.71     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,90,40,165,13,15,2,3,5,20]),
% 0.58/0.71     ['proof']).
% 0.58/0.71  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.58/0.71  % Total time :0.220000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------