↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : PUZ001-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:32:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.61s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   47 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (  38 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  36   ~;  40   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  29   !;   0   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    lives_at_dreadsbury(someone),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',someone_in_mansion) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    killed(someone,aunt_agatha),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',someone_killed_agatha) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = charles
      | X0 = butler
      | X0 = aunt_agatha
      | ~ lives_at_dreadsbury(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',noone_else_lives_at_mansion) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( charles = X0
      | butler = X0
      | aunt_agatha = X0
      | ~ lives_at_dreadsbury(X0) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( hates(X0,X1)
      | ~ killed(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',killer_hates_victim) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ richer(X0,X1)
      | ~ killed(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',killer_poorer_than_victim) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ hates(charles,X0)
      | ~ hates(aunt_agatha,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',charles_and_agatha_hate_different_people) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( hates(aunt_agatha,X0)
      | X0 = butler ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agatha_likes_only_butler) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( hates(aunt_agatha,X0)
      | butler = X0 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( hates(butler,X0)
      | richer(X0,aunt_agatha) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',butler_hates_poor_people) ).

fof(f14,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( hates(butler,X0)
      | ~ hates(aunt_agatha,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',butler_and_agatha_hate_the_same_people) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ hates(X0,every_one_but(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',noone_hates_everyone) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    aunt_agatha != butler,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',agatha_is_not_the_butler) ).

fof(f17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ killed(aunt_agatha,aunt_agatha),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_agatha_killed_herself) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    lives_at_dreadsbury(someone),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    killed(someone,aunt_agatha),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = charles )
      | ( X0 = butler )
      | ( X0 = aunt_agatha )
      | ~ lives_at_dreadsbury(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( hates(X0,X1)
      | ~ killed(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ richer(X0,X1)
      | ~ killed(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ hates(charles,X0)
      | ~ hates(aunt_agatha,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( hates(aunt_agatha,X0)
      | ( X0 = butler ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_74,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( richer(X0,aunt_agatha)
      | hates(butler,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

tcf(c_75,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( hates(butler,X0)
      | ~ hates(aunt_agatha,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

tcf(c_76,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ hates(X0,every_one_but(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

tcf(c_77,plain,
    aunt_agatha != butler,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tcf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
    ~ killed(aunt_agatha,aunt_agatha),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tcf(c_82,plain,
    ( hates(aunt_agatha,aunt_agatha)
    | ( aunt_agatha = butler ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_73]) ).

tcf(c_83,plain,
    ( ~ hates(charles,aunt_agatha)
    | ~ hates(aunt_agatha,aunt_agatha) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_72]) ).

tcf(c_170,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ richer(X0,X1)
      | ( X1 != aunt_agatha )
      | ( X0 != someone ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_171,plain,
    ~ richer(someone,aunt_agatha),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_170]) ).

tcf(c_175,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( hates(X0,X1)
      | ( X1 != aunt_agatha )
      | ( X0 != someone ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_176,plain,
    hates(someone,aunt_agatha),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_175]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ( ( aunt_agatha != aunt_agatha )
    | ( someone != aunt_agatha ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_78]) ).

tcf(c_191,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( hates(butler,X0)
      | ( aunt_agatha != aunt_agatha )
      | ( X0 != someone ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_171]) ).

tcf(c_192,plain,
    hates(butler,someone),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_191]) ).

tcf(c_197,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = charles )
      | ( X0 = butler )
      | ( X0 = aunt_agatha )
      | ( X0 != someone ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_198,plain,
    ( ( someone = charles )
    | ( someone = butler )
    | ( someone = aunt_agatha ) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_197]) ).

tcf(c_217,plain,
    someone != aunt_agatha,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_180]) ).

tcf(c_218,plain,
    ( ( someone = charles )
    | ( someone = butler ) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_198,c_217]) ).

tcf(c_366,plain,
    ( hates(butler,charles)
    | ( someone = butler ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_192]) ).

tcf(c_367,plain,
    ( hates(charles,aunt_agatha)
    | ( someone = butler ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_176]) ).

tcf(c_379,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( hates(butler,X0)
      | ( X0 = butler ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_75]) ).

tcf(c_395,plain,
    every_one_but(butler) = butler,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_379,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_396,plain,
    ~ hates(butler,butler),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_395,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_398,plain,
    someone = butler,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_366,c_77,c_82,c_83,c_367]) ).

tcf(c_400,plain,
    hates(butler,butler),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_192,c_398]) ).

tcf(c_403,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_400,c_396]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : PUZ001-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 06:35:42 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.61/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.61/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.61/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % 
% 1.61/1.28  % clauses                               9
% 1.61/1.28  % conjectures                           0
% 1.61/1.28  % EPR                                   8
% 1.61/1.28  % Horn                                  7
% 1.61/1.28  % unary                                 5
% 1.61/1.28  % binary                                4
% 1.61/1.28  % lits                                  13
% 1.61/1.28  % lits eq                               5
% 1.61/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.61/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.61/1.28  % fd_cond                               1
% 1.61/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.61/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.61/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.61/1.28  % 
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.61/1.28  
% 1.61/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------