%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ001-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:02:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_14ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_17ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ richer(X1,X2)
| ~ killed(X1,X2) ),
c_0_12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ lives(X1)
| hates(butler,X1)
| richer(X1,agatha) ),
c_0_13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ killed(X1,X2)
| hates(X1,X2) ),
c_0_14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( killed(charles,agatha)
| killed(butler,agatha)
| killed(agatha,agatha) ),
somebody_did_it,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ lives(X1)
| ~ killed(X1,agatha)
| hates(butler,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
lives(agatha),
agatha,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
lives(charles),
charles,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ hates(X1,charles)
| ~ hates(X1,butler)
| ~ hates(X1,agatha) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ hates(agatha,X1)
| hates(butler,X1) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
hates(agatha,charles),
agatha_hates_charles,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ hates(charles,X1)
| ~ hates(agatha,X1) ),
c_0_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
hates(agatha,agatha),
agatha_hates_agatha,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
lives(butler),
butler,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ killed(charles,agatha)
| hates(butler,charles) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
hates(butler,agatha),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ killed(butler,agatha)
| hates(butler,butler) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_33]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
~ hates(butler,butler),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
( killed(agatha,agatha)
| hates(butler,charles) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( killed(agatha,agatha)
| hates(charles,agatha) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_24]),c_0_39]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
~ hates(agatha,butler),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]),c_0_32])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ001-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:44:35 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 2170745 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2170752 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.15/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.15/0.44 % Processed clauses : 28
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 0.15/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.15/0.44 % Generated clauses : 17
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16
% 0.15/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Paramodulations : 17
% 0.15/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 9
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of those cached : 6
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.15/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.15/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.15/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.15/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 414
% 0.15/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 23
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.44 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.44 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------