%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ConnectPP---0.7.2
% Problem : PUZ003-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 08:54:16 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.39s
% Output : Proof 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 26 unt; 0 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(one_shaved_then_all_shaved,axiom,
( shaved(members,X)
| ~ shaved(X,Y)
| ~ member(Y)
| ~ member(X) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',one_shaved_then_all_shaved) ).
cnf(all_shaved_then_one_shaved,axiom,
( shaved(Y,X)
| ~ member(Y)
| ~ shaved(members,X) ),
file('theBenchmark.p',all_shaved_then_one_shaved) ).
cnf(guido,hypothesis,
member(guido),
file('theBenchmark.p',guido) ).
cnf(lorenzo,hypothesis,
member(lorenzo),
file('theBenchmark.p',lorenzo) ).
cnf(petruchio,hypothesis,
member(petruchio),
file('theBenchmark.p',petruchio) ).
cnf(cesare,hypothesis,
member(cesare),
file('theBenchmark.p',cesare) ).
cnf(guido_has_shaved_cesare,hypothesis,
shaved(guido,cesare),
file('theBenchmark.p',guido_has_shaved_cesare) ).
cnf(prove_petruchio_has_shaved_lorenzo,negated_conjecture,
~ shaved(petruchio,lorenzo),
file('theBenchmark.p',prove_petruchio_has_shaved_lorenzo) ).
cnf(t1,plain,
~ shaved(petruchio,lorenzo),
inference(start,[status(thm),parent(0:0)],[prove_petruchio_has_shaved_lorenzo]) ).
cnf(t2,plain,
( ~ member(petruchio)
| ~ shaved(members,lorenzo)
| shaved(petruchio,lorenzo) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t1:1)],[all_shaved_then_one_shaved]) ).
cnf(t3,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t2:1)],[t2:1,t1:1]) ).
cnf(t4,plain,
( ~ member(guido)
| ~ shaved(lorenzo,guido)
| ~ member(lorenzo)
| shaved(members,lorenzo) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:2)],[one_shaved_then_all_shaved]) ).
cnf(t5,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t4:1)],[t4:1,t2:2]) ).
cnf(t6,plain,
member(lorenzo),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:2)],[lorenzo]) ).
cnf(t7,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t6:1)],[t6:1,t4:2]) ).
cnf(l3,lemma,
member(lorenzo),
inference(lemma,[status(cth),parent(t4:2),below(t2:2)],[t4:2]) ).
cnf(t8,plain,
( ~ member(lorenzo)
| ~ shaved(members,guido)
| shaved(lorenzo,guido) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:3)],[all_shaved_then_one_shaved]) ).
cnf(t9,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t8:1)],[t8:1,t4:3]) ).
cnf(t10,plain,
( ~ member(cesare)
| ~ shaved(guido,cesare)
| ~ member(guido)
| shaved(members,guido) ),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:2)],[one_shaved_then_all_shaved]) ).
cnf(t11,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t10:1)],[t10:1,t8:2]) ).
cnf(t12,plain,
member(guido),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:2)],[guido]) ).
cnf(t13,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t12:1)],[t12:1,t10:2]) ).
cnf(t14,plain,
shaved(guido,cesare),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:3)],[guido_has_shaved_cesare]) ).
cnf(t15,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t14:1)],[t14:1,t10:3]) ).
cnf(t16,plain,
member(cesare),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t10:4)],[cesare]) ).
cnf(t17,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t16:1)],[t16:1,t10:4]) ).
cnf(t18,plain,
member(lorenzo),
inference(lemma_extension,[status(thm),parent(t8:3)],[l3:1]) ).
cnf(t19,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t18:1)],[t18:1,t8:3]) ).
cnf(t20,plain,
member(guido),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t4:4)],[guido]) ).
cnf(t21,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t20:1)],[t20:1,t4:4]) ).
cnf(t22,plain,
member(petruchio),
inference(extension,[status(thm),parent(t2:3)],[petruchio]) ).
cnf(t23,plain,
$false,
inference(connection,[status(thm),parent(t22:1)],[t22:1,t2:3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : PUZ003-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03 This is a CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_HRN problem
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/connect++ --verbosity 1 --no-colour --tptp-proof --schedule default --timeout 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Sep 19 19:55:20 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------