↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : PUZ005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 18:26:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.05s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem  : PUZ005-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Sat May 28 21:17:40 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.30  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.10/0.30  The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.10/0.30  Sat May 28 21:17:40 2022
% 0.10/0.30  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 9714.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.10/0.30  set(auto).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.10/0.30  clear(print_given).
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  list(usable).
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.10/0.30  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.10/0.30  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.10/0.30     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  ------------> process usable:
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  ------------> process sos:
% 0.10/0.30  
% 0.10/0.30  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.33  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.33  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.33  number of clauses in intial UL: 50
% 0.14/0.33  number of clauses initially in problem: 53
% 0.14/0.33  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.14/0.33  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.33  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.33  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.14/0.33     distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.14/0.33     distinct function count: 2
% 0.14/0.33     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  
% 0.14/0.33  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.94 sec ----> 256 [hyper,251,46,174,187] {-} $F.
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  Length of proof is 34.  Level of proof is 17.
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  6 [] {+} -monday(A)| -sunday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  11 [] {+} -tuesday(A)| -sunday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  15 [] {+} -wednesday(A)| -sunday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  22 [] {+} -monday(yesterday(A))|tuesday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  23 [] {+} -tuesday(yesterday(A))|wednesday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  24 [] {+} -wednesday(yesterday(A))|thursday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  25 [] {+} -thursday(yesterday(A))|friday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  26 [] {+} -friday(yesterday(A))|saturday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  27 [] {+} -saturday(yesterday(A))|sunday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  32 [] {+} thursday(yesterday(A))| -friday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  33 [] {+} friday(yesterday(A))| -saturday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  36 [] {+} -member(A,lying_days(lion))|monday(A)|tuesday(A)|wednesday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  37 [] {+} -member(A,lying_days(unicorn))|thursday(A)|friday(A)|saturday(A).
% 1.05/1.25  39 [] {+} -tuesday(A)|member(A,lying_days(lion)).
% 1.05/1.25  40 [] {+} -wednesday(A)|member(A,lying_days(lion)).
% 1.05/1.25  41 [] {+} -thursday(A)|member(A,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  42 [] {+} -friday(A)|member(A,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  43 [] {+} -saturday(A)|member(A,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  44 [] {+} member(A,lying_days(B))| -admits(B,A,C)|member(C,lying_days(B)).
% 1.05/1.25  45 [] {+} member(A,lying_days(B))|admits(B,A,C)| -member(C,lying_days(B)).
% 1.05/1.25  46 [] {+} -member(A,lying_days(B))| -admits(B,A,C)| -member(C,lying_days(B)).
% 1.05/1.25  47 [] {+} -member(A,lying_days(B))|admits(B,A,C)|member(C,lying_days(B)).
% 1.05/1.25  48 [] {+} -thursday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  52 [] {-} admits(lion,today,yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  53 [] {-} admits(unicorn,today,yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  57 [hyper,52,44] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion))|member(yesterday(today),lying_days(lion)).
% 1.05/1.25  58 [hyper,53,44] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn))|member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  64 [hyper,57,36] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion))|monday(yesterday(today))|tuesday(yesterday(today))|wednesday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  68 [hyper,58,45] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn))|member(A,lying_days(unicorn))|admits(unicorn,A,today).
% 1.05/1.25  69 [hyper,58,37,unit_del,48] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn))|friday(today)|saturday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  70 [hyper,58,47] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn))|admits(unicorn,yesterday(today),A)|member(A,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  73 [factor,68.1.2] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn))|admits(unicorn,yesterday(today),today).
% 1.05/1.25  74 [factor,70.1.3] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn))|admits(unicorn,yesterday(today),today).
% 1.05/1.25  79 [hyper,69,33] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn))|friday(today)|friday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  91 [hyper,73,46,74,53,factor_simp] {-} admits(unicorn,yesterday(today),today).
% 1.05/1.25  95 [hyper,79,42,factor_simp] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn))|friday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  96 [hyper,95,32] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn))|thursday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  97 [hyper,96,41,factor_simp] {-} member(yesterday(today),lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  100 [hyper,97,37] {-} thursday(yesterday(today))|friday(yesterday(today))|saturday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  118 [hyper,100,25] {-} friday(yesterday(today))|saturday(yesterday(today))|friday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  119 [hyper,118,33] {-} friday(yesterday(today))|friday(today)|friday(yesterday(yesterday(today))).
% 1.05/1.25  132 [hyper,119,26] {-} friday(today)|friday(yesterday(yesterday(today)))|saturday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  137 [hyper,132,43] {-} friday(today)|friday(yesterday(yesterday(today)))|member(today,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  149 [hyper,137,42,factor_simp] {-} friday(yesterday(yesterday(today)))|member(today,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  159 [hyper,149,42] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn))|member(yesterday(yesterday(today)),lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  161 [hyper,149,26] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn))|saturday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  162 [hyper,161,27] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn))|sunday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  174 [hyper,159,46,97,91] {-} member(yesterday(yesterday(today)),lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  179 [hyper,174,47] {-} admits(unicorn,yesterday(yesterday(today)),A)|member(A,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  187 [hyper,179,46,97,91] {-} admits(unicorn,yesterday(yesterday(today)),today).
% 1.05/1.25  191 [hyper,64,24,unit_del,48] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion))|monday(yesterday(today))|tuesday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  200 [hyper,191,23] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion))|monday(yesterday(today))|wednesday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  210 [hyper,200,40,factor_simp] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion))|monday(yesterday(today)).
% 1.05/1.25  212 [hyper,210,22] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion))|tuesday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  218 [hyper,212,39,factor_simp] {-} member(today,lying_days(lion)).
% 1.05/1.25  221 [hyper,218,36] {-} monday(today)|tuesday(today)|wednesday(today).
% 1.05/1.25  226 [hyper,221,15,162] {-} monday(today)|tuesday(today)|member(today,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  249 [hyper,226,11,162,factor_simp] {-} monday(today)|member(today,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  251 [hyper,249,6,162,factor_simp] {-} member(today,lying_days(unicorn)).
% 1.05/1.25  256 [hyper,251,46,174,187] {-} $F.
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.05/1.25  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.25  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.05/1.25  
% 1.05/1.26  ============ end of search ============
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 1.05/1.26  false clauses given         64
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.05/1.26     8  2         0
% 1.05/1.26     9  2         0
% 1.05/1.26    10  5         0
% 1.05/1.26    11  8         0
% 1.05/1.26    12  10        0
% 1.05/1.26    13  4         0
% 1.05/1.26    14  4         0
% 1.05/1.26    15  2         0
% 1.05/1.26    16  2         0
% 1.05/1.26    17  2         0
% 1.05/1.26    18  1         0
% 1.05/1.26    19  2         0
% 1.05/1.26    21  1         0
% 1.05/1.26    23  1         0
% 1.05/1.26    27  1         0
% 1.05/1.26    37  1         0
% 1.05/1.26    42  1         0
% 1.05/1.26  tot:  49        0      (0.0% true)
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.05/1.26  
% 1.05/1.26  Process 9714 finished Sat May 28 21:17:41 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------