↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : PUZ008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  27 unt;   0 nHn;  40 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  111 (   0 equ;  63 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   98 (  14 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(great_eq_recursive,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | greater_or_equal(s(X1),s(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',great_eq_recursive) ).

cnf(great_eq_base,axiom,
    greater_or_equal(X1,n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',great_eq_base) ).

cnf(same_or_more_missionaries_is_safe,axiom,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | safe(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',same_or_more_missionaries_is_safe) ).

cnf(missionary_and_cannibal_west_to_east,axiom,
    ( ~ safe(s(X3),s(X4))
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(s(X4)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',missionary_and_cannibal_west_to_east) ).

cnf(missionary_east_to_west,axiom,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(s(X1),X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(X2)),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',missionary_east_to_west) ).

cnf(start_on_west_bank,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(s(n0))))),boatonwest,east(m(n0),c(n0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',start_on_west_bank) ).

cnf(two_cannibals_west_to_east,axiom,
    ( ~ safe(X3,s(s(X4)))
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(s(s(X2)))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(X3),c(s(s(X4))))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',two_cannibals_west_to_east) ).

cnf(no_missionaries_is_safe,axiom,
    safe(n0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',no_missionaries_is_safe) ).

cnf(cannibal_east_to_west,axiom,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(X1,s(X2))
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(X3),c(s(X4))))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cannibal_east_to_west) ).

cnf(two_missionaries_west_to_east,axiom,
    ( ~ safe(s(s(X3)),X4)
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(s(s(X1))),c(X2)),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(s(X3))),c(X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',two_missionaries_west_to_east) ).

cnf(missionary_and_cannibal_east_to_west,axiom,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(s(X1),s(X2))
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(s(X4))))
    | achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',missionary_and_cannibal_east_to_west) ).

cnf(prove_can_get_to_east_bank,negated_conjecture,
    ~ achievable(west(m(n0),c(n0)),X1,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(s(n0)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_can_get_to_east_bank) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | greater_or_equal(s(X1),s(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[great_eq_recursive]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | greater_or_equal(s(X1),s(X2)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    greater_or_equal(X1,n0),
    great_eq_base ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | safe(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[same_or_more_missionaries_is_safe]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    greater_or_equal(s(X1),s(n0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ safe(s(X3),s(X4))
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(s(X4)))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[missionary_and_cannibal_west_to_east]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
    | safe(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    greater_or_equal(s(s(X1)),s(s(n0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(s(X1),X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(X2)),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[missionary_east_to_west]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ safe(s(X3),s(X4))
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(s(X4)))) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(s(n0))))),boatonwest,east(m(n0),c(n0))),
    start_on_west_bank ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    safe(s(X1),s(n0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    safe(s(s(X1)),s(s(n0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,s(s(X4)))
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(s(s(X2)))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(X3),c(s(s(X4))))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[two_cannibals_west_to_east]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(s(X1),X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(X2)),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(n0))),c(s(s(n0)))),boatoneast,east(m(s(n0)),c(s(n0)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    safe(n0,X1),
    no_missionaries_is_safe ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(X1,s(X2))
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(X3),c(s(X4))))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cannibal_east_to_west]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,s(s(X4)))
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(s(s(X2)))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(X3),c(s(s(X4))))) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(n0)))),boatonwest,east(m(n0),c(s(n0)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_24]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    safe(X1,n0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ safe(s(s(X3)),X4)
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(s(s(X1))),c(X2)),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(s(X3))),c(X4))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[two_missionaries_west_to_east]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(X1,s(X2))
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(X3),c(s(X4))))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(n0)),boatoneast,east(m(n0),c(s(s(s(n0)))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_28]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(s(X1),s(X2))
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(s(X4))))
    | achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[missionary_and_cannibal_east_to_west]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ safe(s(s(X3)),X4)
    | ~ safe(X1,X2)
    | ~ achievable(west(m(s(s(X1))),c(X2)),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4)))
    | achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(s(X3))),c(X4))) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(n0))),boatonwest,east(m(n0),c(s(s(n0))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_23]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ safe(X3,X4)
    | ~ safe(s(X1),s(X2))
    | ~ achievable(west(m(X1),c(X2)),boatoneast,east(m(s(X3)),c(s(X4))))
    | achievable(west(m(s(X1)),c(s(X2))),boatonwest,east(m(X3),c(X4))) ),
    c_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(n0)),c(s(n0))),boatoneast,east(m(s(s(n0))),c(s(s(n0))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_24]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(s(s(n0))),c(s(s(n0)))),boatonwest,east(m(s(n0)),c(s(n0)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_24]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(n0),c(s(s(n0)))),boatoneast,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(n0)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_41]),c_0_23]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(n0),c(s(s(s(n0))))),boatonwest,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(n0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_42]),c_0_28]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(n0),c(s(n0))),boatoneast,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(n0))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_43]),c_0_24]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    greater_or_equal(s(s(s(X1))),s(s(s(n0)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ achievable(west(m(n0),c(n0)),X1,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(s(n0)))))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_can_get_to_east_bank]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,hypothesis,
    achievable(west(m(n0),c(s(s(n0)))),boatonwest,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(n0)))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_44]),c_0_28]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    safe(s(s(s(X1))),s(s(s(n0)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ achievable(west(m(n0),c(n0)),X1,east(m(s(s(s(n0)))),c(s(s(s(n0)))))),
    c_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_50,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_47]),c_0_48]),c_0_32])]),c_0_49]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PUZ008-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:44:21 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4069039 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.43  % Search class: FHUNS-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % partial match(1): FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 4069051 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.43  % Search class: FHUNS-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % partial match(1): FHUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_SE_SP_S0V with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 16
% 0.13/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 16
% 0.13/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 16
% 0.13/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 67
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.13/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.13/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 63
% 0.13/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 61
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 47
% 0.13/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 61
% 0.13/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 87
% 0.13/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 63
% 0.13/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 0.13/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.13/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.13/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 17
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.13/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 21
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.13/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 316
% 0.13/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168
% 0.13/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.13/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.13/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 130
% 0.13/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3975
% 0.13/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 69
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.13/0.43  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.13/0.43  
% 0.13/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.43  % User time                : 0.037 s
% 0.13/0.43  % System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Total time               : 0.056 s
% 0.13/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------