↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : PUZ012_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:32:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s 1.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  164 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   94 (  45   ~;  42   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :   70 (  70 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   9 usr;   6 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0 sgn  46   !;   0   ?;  46   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(func_def_0,type,
    boxa: box ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    equal_fruits: ( fruit * fruit ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_2,type,
    equal_boxes: ( box * box ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_3,type,
    contains: ( fruit * box ) > $o ).

tff(pred_def_4,type,
    label: ( fruit * box ) > $o ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    oranges: fruit ).

tff(type_def_6,type,
    fruit: $tType ).

tff(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit] :
      ~ ( contains(X0,X1)
        & label(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',label_is_wrong) ).

tff(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0: fruit] :
      ( contains(boxc,X0)
      | contains(boxb,X0)
      | contains(boxa,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',each_thing_is_in_a_box) ).

tff(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: box] :
      ( contains(X0,oranges)
      | contains(X0,bananas)
      | contains(X0,apples) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',each_box_contains_something) ).

tff(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit,X2: fruit] :
      ( ( contains(X0,X2)
        & contains(X0,X1) )
     => equal_fruits(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contains_is_well_defined1) ).

tff(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit,X2: box] :
      ( ( contains(X2,X1)
        & contains(X0,X1) )
     => equal_boxes(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contains_is_well_defined2) ).

tff(f9,axiom,
    ~ equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boxb_not_boxc) ).

tff(f11,axiom,
    ~ equal_fruits(apples,bananas),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apples_not_bananas) ).

tff(f16,axiom,
    label(boxc,bananas),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boxc_labelled_bananas) ).

tff(f17,axiom,
    contains(boxb,apples),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',boxb_contains_apples) ).

tff(f18,conjecture,
    ( contains(boxc,oranges)
    & contains(boxa,bananas) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_boxa_contains_bananas_and_boxc_oranges) ).

tff(f19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( contains(boxc,oranges)
      & contains(boxa,bananas) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f18]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | ~ label(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit,X2: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(X0,X2)
      | ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | equal_fruits(X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tff(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit,X2: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(X0,X2)
      | ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | equal_fruits(X1,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f21]) ).

tff(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit,X2: box] :
      ( ~ contains(X2,X1)
      | ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | equal_boxes(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tff(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit,X2: box] :
      ( ~ contains(X2,X1)
      | ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | equal_boxes(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f23]) ).

tff(f25,plain,
    ( ~ contains(boxc,oranges)
    | ~ contains(boxa,bananas) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tff(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: box,X1: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | ~ label(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: fruit] :
      ( contains(boxc,X0)
      | contains(boxb,X0)
      | contains(boxa,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ! [X0: box] :
      ( contains(X0,oranges)
      | contains(X0,bananas)
      | contains(X0,apples) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: fruit,X0: box,X1: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(X0,X2)
      | ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | equal_fruits(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tff(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: box,X0: box,X1: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(X2,X1)
      | ~ contains(X0,X1)
      | equal_boxes(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tff(f34,plain,
    ~ equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f36,plain,
    ~ equal_fruits(apples,bananas),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    label(boxc,bananas),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

tff(f42,plain,
    contains(boxb,apples),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f43,plain,
    ( ~ contains(boxc,oranges)
    | ~ contains(boxa,bananas) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0_box: box,X0_fruit: fruit] :
      ( ~ label(X0_box,X0_fruit)
      | ~ contains(X0_box,X0_fruit) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0_fruit: fruit] :
      ( contains(boxc,X0_fruit)
      | contains(boxb,X0_fruit)
      | contains(boxa,X0_fruit) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0_box: box] :
      ( contains(X0_box,oranges)
      | contains(X0_box,bananas)
      | contains(X0_box,apples) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

tcf(c_54,plain,
    ! [X0_box: box,X0_fruit: fruit,X1_fruit: fruit] :
      ( equal_fruits(X1_fruit,X0_fruit)
      | ~ contains(X0_box,X1_fruit)
      | ~ contains(X0_box,X0_fruit) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0_box: box,X0_fruit: fruit,X1_box: box] :
      ( equal_boxes(X1_box,X0_box)
      | ~ contains(X1_box,X0_fruit)
      | ~ contains(X0_box,X0_fruit) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ~ equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ~ equal_fruits(apples,bananas),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

tcf(c_64,plain,
    label(boxc,bananas),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_65,plain,
    contains(boxb,apples),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ contains(boxc,oranges)
    | ~ contains(boxa,bananas) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

tcf(c_135,plain,
    ~ contains(boxc,bananas),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_64]) ).

tcf(c_142,plain,
    ! [X0_box: box] :
      ( ~ contains(X0_box,bananas)
      | ~ contains(X0_box,apples) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_59]) ).

tcf(c_177,plain,
    ! [X0_fruit: fruit] :
      ( ~ contains(boxc,X0_fruit)
      | ~ contains(boxb,X0_fruit) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_57]) ).

tcf(c_178,plain,
    ( ~ contains(boxc,apples)
    | ~ contains(boxb,apples) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_177]) ).

tcf(c_247,plain,
    ( ~ contains(boxb,bananas)
    | ~ contains(boxb,apples) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tcf(c_258,plain,
    ( contains(boxc,oranges)
    | contains(boxc,bananas)
    | contains(boxc,apples) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_259,plain,
    ( contains(boxc,bananas)
    | contains(boxb,bananas)
    | contains(boxa,bananas) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).

tcf(c_260,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_259,c_258,c_247,c_178,c_135,c_66,c_65]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : PUZ012_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.58  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.58  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.58  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.58  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.58  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.58  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.58  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 06:40:56 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.58  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.62  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.62  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.63  
% 0.15/0.63  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/0.63  
% 0.15/0.63  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/0.64  % Proving...
% 0.92/1.49  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/1.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.92/1.49  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.92/1.49  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 0.92/1.49  % 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Preprocessing... pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Preprocessing...% ------  preprocesses with Global Options Modified: tff_prep: switching off prep_sem_filter, sub_typing, pure_diseq_elim
% 0.92/1.49   gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Proving...
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % 
% 0.92/1.49  % clauses                               13
% 0.92/1.49  % conjectures                           1
% 0.92/1.49  % EPR                                   13
% 0.92/1.49  % Horn                                  11
% 0.92/1.49  % unary                                 4
% 0.92/1.49  % binary                                7
% 0.92/1.49  % lits                                  24
% 0.92/1.49  % lits eq                               0
% 0.92/1.49  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.92/1.49  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.92/1.49  % fd_cond                               0
% 0.92/1.49  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 0.92/1.49  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Schedule EPR non Horn non eq is on
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false" Time Limit: 70.
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ 
% 0.92/1.49  % Current options:
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % ------ Proving...
% 0.92/1.49  % 
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.92/1.49  
% 0.92/1.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------