%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ012_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:01:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.45s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_22ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_52ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_18,plain,
! [X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X1)
| ~ label(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
label(boxc,bananas),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxc_labelled_bananas]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxc,bananas),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_25,plain,
! [X2: box] :
( contains(X2,oranges)
| contains(X2,bananas)
| contains(X2,apples) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_26,plain,
! [X1: fruit] :
( contains(boxc,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1)
| contains(boxa,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_27,plain,
! [X1: fruit,X2: box,X4: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X4)
| ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_28,plain,
! [X3: box,X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X3,X1)
| ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_boxes(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
( contains(boxc,apples)
| contains(boxc,oranges) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
( contains(boxa,bananas)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_37,plain,
! [X1: fruit,X4: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxc,X4)
| equal_fruits(X4,X1)
| contains(boxa,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X2: box,X3: box] :
( ~ contains(X3,bananas)
| equal_boxes(X3,X2)
| contains(X2,apples)
| contains(X2,oranges) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxc,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,oranges)
| contains(boxc,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( ~ contains(X2,bananas)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxa)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
contains(boxb,apples),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxb_contains_apples]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
label(boxa,apples),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxa_labelled_apples]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_43,hypothesis,
label(boxb,oranges),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxb_labelled_oranges]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_52,plain,
! [X1: fruit,X4: fruit] :
( equal_fruits(X1,X4)
| contains(boxb,X4)
| contains(boxa,X4)
| contains(boxa,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_53,plain,
! [X2: box,X3: box] :
( equal_boxes(X2,X3)
| contains(X3,oranges)
| contains(X3,apples)
| contains(X2,apples)
| contains(X2,oranges) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_54,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( equal_fruits(oranges,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1)
| contains(boxa,X1)
| contains(boxc,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_55,plain,
! [X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,bananas)
| contains(X2,apples)
| contains(X2,oranges) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_56,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( equal_boxes(boxa,X2)
| contains(X2,oranges)
| contains(X2,apples)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_57,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( equal_fruits(X1,oranges)
| contains(boxa,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1)
| contains(boxc,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_58,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( equal_boxes(X2,boxa)
| contains(X2,apples)
| contains(X2,oranges)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_59,plain,
! [X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxc)
| contains(boxa,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_26]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxb,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_61,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxa,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,bananas)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_30]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_62,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( ~ contains(X2,oranges)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxc)
| contains(boxc,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_63,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( ~ contains(X2,apples)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxb) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_64,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxa,apples),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_42]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_65,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxb,oranges),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_43]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_66,plain,
~ equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_67,plain,
~ equal_boxes(boxa,boxc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_68,plain,
~ equal_boxes(boxa,boxb),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_69,plain,
~ equal_fruits(bananas,oranges),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_70,plain,
~ equal_fruits(apples,oranges),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_71,plain,
~ equal_fruits(apples,bananas),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_72,plain,
! [X1: fruit] : equal_fruits(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_73,plain,
! [X2: box] : equal_boxes(X2,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_51]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ012_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:46:46 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3333445 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGHNS-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 3333454 completed with status 1
% 0.15/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.45 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.45 % Search class: FGHNS-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % No proof found!
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/0.45 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 29
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.15/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.15/0.45 % Processed clauses : 67
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % ...subsumed : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 55
% 0.15/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Generated clauses : 55
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.15/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Paramodulations : 55
% 0.15/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.15/0.45 % ...of those cached : 15
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 38
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 23
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 0.15/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 113
% 0.15/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71
% 0.15/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18
% 0.15/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.15/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1777
% 0.15/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 57
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.15/0.45
% 0.15/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.45 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/0.45 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Total time : 0.029 s
% 0.15/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------