%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ012_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:02:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_25ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_29ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tcf(c_0_18,plain,
! [X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X1)
| ~ label(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
label(boxc,bananas),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxc_labelled_bananas]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxc,bananas),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_24,plain,
! [X2: box] :
( contains(X2,oranges)
| contains(X2,bananas)
| contains(X2,apples) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_26,plain,
! [X3: box,X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X3,X1)
| ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_boxes(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_29,plain,
~ equal_boxes(boxa,boxc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_37,plain,
! [X1: fruit,X2: box,X4: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X4)
| ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_38,plain,
! [X1: fruit] :
( contains(boxc,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1)
| contains(boxa,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_39,plain,
~ equal_boxes(boxb,boxc),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_41,hypothesis,
contains(boxb,apples),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxb_contains_apples]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_42,hypothesis,
label(boxb,oranges),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxb_labelled_oranges]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_43,plain,
~ equal_fruits(apples,oranges),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_44,plain,
! [X1: fruit,X4: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxc,X4)
| equal_fruits(X4,X1)
| contains(boxb,X1)
| contains(boxa,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_45,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxa,oranges),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_46,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxb,oranges),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_42]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_47,plain,
~ contains(boxc,apples),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),c_0_46]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_51,hypothesis,
contains(boxc,oranges),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_47]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_52,hypothesis,
( contains(boxb,bananas)
| contains(boxa,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_53,hypothesis,
label(boxa,apples),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[boxa_labelled_apples]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_59,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( ~ contains(X2,oranges)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxc) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_51]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_60,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxc,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,oranges) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_51]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_61,plain,
! [X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,bananas)
| contains(X2,oranges)
| contains(X2,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_24]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_62,plain,
! [X2: box,X3: box] :
( ~ contains(X3,bananas)
| equal_boxes(X3,X2)
| contains(X2,oranges)
| contains(X2,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_63,plain,
! [X2: box,X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(X2,X1)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxc)
| contains(boxb,X1)
| contains(boxa,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_38]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_64,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxa,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,bananas)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_52]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_65,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( ~ contains(X2,bananas)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxa)
| contains(boxb,bananas) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_52]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_66,hypothesis,
! [X1: fruit] :
( ~ contains(boxb,X1)
| equal_fruits(X1,apples) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_67,hypothesis,
! [X2: box] :
( ~ contains(X2,apples)
| equal_boxes(X2,boxb) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_41]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_68,hypothesis,
~ contains(boxa,apples),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_53]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_69,plain,
~ equal_boxes(boxa,boxb),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_70,plain,
~ equal_fruits(bananas,oranges),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_55]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_71,plain,
~ equal_fruits(apples,bananas),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_56]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_72,plain,
! [X1: fruit] : equal_fruits(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]),
[final] ).
tcf(c_0_73,plain,
! [X2: box] : equal_boxes(X2,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_58]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : PUZ012_10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:45:54 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 75481 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHNS-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 75488 completed with status 1
% 0.12/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.12/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.44 % Search class: FGHNS-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.12/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.12/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.12/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.12/0.44
% 0.12/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.12/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.12/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 29
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.12/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 0.12/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.12/0.44 % Processed clauses : 55
% 0.12/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.12/0.44 % ...subsumed : 14
% 0.12/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 0.12/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.12/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.12/0.44 % Generated clauses : 52
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 40
% 0.12/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Paramodulations : 51
% 0.12/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.12/0.45 % ...of those cached : 10
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 34
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.12/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.12/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.12/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 78
% 0.12/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% 0.12/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.12/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.12/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.12/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1503
% 0.12/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 57
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.12/0.45
% 0.12/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.12/0.45 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.45 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.12/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.12/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------