%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CARINE---0.734 % Problem : PUZ013-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0. % Transfm : add_equality % Format : carine % Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000 % Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz % Memory : 2006MB % OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:55:18 EST 2010 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s % Output : Refutation 0.15s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % Command entered: % /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6177/PUZ/PUZ013-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000 % CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003) % Initializing tables ... done. % Parsing .................... done. % Calculating time slices ... done. % Building Lookup Tables ... done. % Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 2] [ut = 4] % Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ... % t = 0 secs [nr = 52] [nf = 1] [nu = 9] [ut = 7] % Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ... % +================================================+ % | | % | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. | % | | % +================================================+ % Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof: % ============================================ % Base Clauses: % ------------- % B0: ~some_monitors_are_awake % B1: some_english_sing % B2: some_scotch_dance_not % B6: some_monitors_are_awake | some_monitors_are_not_awake % B9: ~some_english_sing | ~some_english_sing_not | some_monitors_are_awake % B10: ~some_english_sing | ~some_monitors_are_not_awake | some_irish_fight_not % B15: ~some_irish_fight_not | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_germans_play % B19: ~some_english_sing | ~some_germans_play | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not % Unit Clauses: % -------------- % U1: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > some_english_sing % U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b > some_scotch_dance_not % U3: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_monitors_are_not_awake % U4: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > ~some_english_sing_not % U5: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_irish_fight_not % U6: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_germans_play % U7: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > some_english_sing_not % --------------- Start of Proof --------------- % Derivation of unit clause U1: % some_english_sing ....... U1 % Derivation of unit clause U2: % some_scotch_dance_not ....... U2 % Derivation of unit clause U3: % ~some_monitors_are_awake ....... B0 % some_monitors_are_awake | some_monitors_are_not_awake ....... B6 % some_monitors_are_not_awake ....... R1 [B0:L0, B6:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U4: % ~some_monitors_are_awake ....... B0 % ~some_english_sing | ~some_english_sing_not | some_monitors_are_awake ....... B9 % ~some_english_sing | ~some_english_sing_not ....... R1 [B0:L0, B9:L2] % some_english_sing ....... U1 % ~some_english_sing_not ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U5: % some_english_sing ....... B1 % ~some_english_sing | ~some_monitors_are_not_awake | some_irish_fight_not ....... B10 % ~some_monitors_are_not_awake | some_irish_fight_not ....... R1 [B1:L0, B10:L0] % some_monitors_are_not_awake ....... U3 % some_irish_fight_not ....... R2 [R1:L0, U3:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U6: % some_scotch_dance_not ....... B2 % ~some_irish_fight_not | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_germans_play ....... B15 % ~some_irish_fight_not | some_germans_play ....... R1 [B2:L0, B15:L1] % some_irish_fight_not ....... U5 % some_germans_play ....... R2 [R1:L0, U5:L0] % Derivation of unit clause U7: % some_english_sing ....... B1 % ~some_english_sing | ~some_germans_play | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not ....... B19 % ~some_germans_play | ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not ....... R1 [B1:L0, B19:L0] % some_germans_play ....... U6 % ~some_scotch_dance_not | some_english_sing_not ....... R2 [R1:L0, U6:L0] % some_scotch_dance_not ....... U2 % some_english_sing_not ....... R3 [R2:L0, U2:L0] % Derivation of the empty clause: % some_english_sing_not ....... U7 % ~some_english_sing_not ....... U4 % [] ....... R1 [U7:L0, U4:L0] % --------------- End of Proof --------------- % PROOF FOUND! % --------------------------------------------- % | Statistics | % --------------------------------------------- % Profile 3: Performance Statistics: % ================================== % Total number of generated clauses: 77 % resolvents: 76 factors: 1 % Number of unit clauses generated: 18 % % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 23.38 % Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]: % ============================================================= % [0] = 3 [1] = 1 [2] = 3 [3] = 1 % Total = 8 % Number of generated clauses having [x] literals: % ------------------------------------------------ % [1] = 18 [2] = 33 [3] = 26 % Average size of a generated clause: 3.0 % Number of unit clauses per predicate list: % ========================================== % [0] some_english_sing (+)1 (-)0 % [1] some_english_sing_not (+)1 (-)1 % [2] some_germans_play (+)1 (-)0 % [3] some_germans_play_not (+)0 (-)0 % [4] some_irish_fight (+)0 (-)0 % [5] some_irish_fight_not (+)1 (-)0 % [6] some_monitors_are_awake (+)0 (-)1 % [7] some_monitors_are_not_awake (+)1 (-)0 % [8] some_of_the_eleven_are_not_oiling (+)0 (-)0 % [9] some_scotch_dance (+)0 (-)0 % [10] some_scotch_dance_not (+)1 (-)0 % [11] some_welsh_eat (+)0 (-)0 % [12] some_welsh_eat_not (+)0 (-)0 % ------------------ % Total: (+)6 (-)2 % Total number of unit clauses retained: 8 % Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 168 % N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses % because of the shortest resolvents table: 0 % Number of successful unifications: 87 % Number of unification failures: 0 % Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0 % N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 191 % N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 299 % N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0 % Max entries in substitution set: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6 % N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0 % N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0 % N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0 % Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0 % Max term depth in a unit clause: 0 % Number of states in UCFA table: 3 % Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0 % Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000 % Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00 % Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf % Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 47 % Profile 2: Number of calls to: % ============================== % PTUnify() = 87 % ConstructUnitClause() = 11 % Profile 1: Time spent in: % ========================= % ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs % -------------------------------------------------------- % | | % Inferences per sec: inf % | | % -------------------------------------------------------- % Elapsed time: 0 secs % CPU time: 0.14 secs % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------