%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : PUZ013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:02:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 12 unt; 2 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 57 ( 0 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 8 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_some_monitors_are_awake,negated_conjecture,
~ some_monitors_are_awake,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_some_monitors_are_awake) ).
cnf(c6,axiom,
( ~ some_irish_fight_not
| ~ some_scotch_dance_not
| some_germans_play ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c6) ).
cnf(c10,axiom,
( ~ some_monitors_are_not_awake
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_irish_fight_not ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c10) ).
cnf(c13,axiom,
( some_monitors_are_awake
| some_monitors_are_not_awake ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c13) ).
cnf(c19,axiom,
some_scotch_dance_not,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c19) ).
cnf(c18,axiom,
some_english_sing,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c18) ).
cnf(c1,axiom,
( ~ some_english_sing_not
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_monitors_are_awake ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c1) ).
cnf(c9,axiom,
( ~ some_germans_play
| ~ some_scotch_dance_not
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_english_sing_not ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c9) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ some_monitors_are_awake,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_some_monitors_are_awake]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ some_irish_fight_not
| ~ some_scotch_dance_not
| some_germans_play ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ some_monitors_are_not_awake
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_irish_fight_not ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c10]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
( some_monitors_are_awake
| some_monitors_are_not_awake ),
c13 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ some_monitors_are_awake,
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ some_irish_fight_not
| ~ some_scotch_dance_not
| some_germans_play ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
some_scotch_dance_not,
c19 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ some_monitors_are_not_awake
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_irish_fight_not ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
some_english_sing,
c18 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
some_monitors_are_not_awake,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ some_english_sing_not
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_monitors_are_awake ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c1]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ some_germans_play
| ~ some_scotch_dance_not
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_english_sing_not ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c9]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ some_irish_fight_not
| some_germans_play ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
some_irish_fight_not,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ some_english_sing_not
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_monitors_are_awake ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ some_germans_play
| ~ some_scotch_dance_not
| ~ some_english_sing
| some_english_sing_not ),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
some_germans_play,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ some_english_sing_not,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16])]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_14])]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : PUZ013-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 03:50:59 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with pid 2122574 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G----_404_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2122578 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 20
% 0.15/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.15/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.15/0.44 % Processed clauses : 23
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.15/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.15/0.44 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.15/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.15/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.15/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 452
% 0.15/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 34
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.44 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3580 pages
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.44 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------